Toolmark and Materials Laboratory, Department of Identification and Forensic Science (DIFS), Israel Police, Jerusalem 91906, Israel.
Toolmark and Materials Laboratory, Department of Identification and Forensic Science (DIFS), Israel Police, Jerusalem 91906, Israel.
Forensic Sci Int. 2022 Jul;336:111339. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2022.111339. Epub 2022 May 10.
When reporting results of Gunshot Residue (GSR) analysis from a person suspected to be involved in a recent shooting, most forensic experts only provide the court with the raw results (i.e. the number of GSR particles found) and a disclaimer that a positive finding does not prove that the suspect was involved in a firearm shooting incident whilst a negative finding does not prove that he was not. Probabilistic analysis of the GSR results provides more value to the court, so the present study calculated likelihood ratio (LR) values for finding 0-8 characteristic GSR particles (containing Lead, Barium and Antimony) on a suspect's hands, based on the available GSR data from the published literature as well as studies by the authors. Defense propositions, i.e. modes for GSR acquisition other than involvement in a shooting event, were divided into three broad categories: low, medium and heavy background. For each background level and number of GSR particles found, minimal and maximal LR values were calculated. Thus, for each proposition the defense provides for the presence of GSR on the defendant's hands, the forensic expert can provide a possible set of minimal and maximal LR values, leaving the court to examine the defendant's contention and decide which of the three background modes is more plausible according to the circumstances of the specific case.
当报告涉嫌最近枪击事件的人员的枪击残留物 (GSR) 分析结果时,大多数法医专家仅向法庭提供原始结果(即发现的 GSR 颗粒数量),并声明阳性结果并不能证明嫌疑人参与了枪支射击事件,而阴性结果也不能证明他没有参与。对 GSR 结果进行概率分析可为法庭提供更多价值,因此本研究根据已发表文献中的可用 GSR 数据以及作者的研究,计算了嫌疑人手上发现 0-8 个特征性 GSR 颗粒(含铅、钡和锑)的可能性比值 (LR) 值。辩护主张,即除参与枪击事件以外获取 GSR 的方式,分为三大类:低、中、高背景。对于每个背景水平和发现的 GSR 颗粒数量,计算了最小和最大 LR 值。因此,对于辩护方提出的 GSR 存在于被告手上的每一种主张,法医专家都可以提供最小和最大 LR 值的可能范围,由法庭审查被告的主张,并根据具体案件的情况决定三种背景模式中的哪一种更合理。