Facultad de Ciencia y Tecnología, Universidad Internacional de Valencia, 46002 Valencia, Spain.
Department of Endocrinology, University Hospital of La Ribera, 46600 Alzira, Spain.
Sensors (Basel). 2022 Apr 19;22(9):3101. doi: 10.3390/s22093101.
Continuous glucose monitors (CGM) have improved the management of patients with type 1 diabetes (T1D), with glucose oxidase (GOx)-based sensors being the most used. However, they are potentially subject to both electrochemical and enzymatic interferences, including those related to changes of pH. The objective of this study is to investigate the effect of ethanol, given as beer along with a mixed meal, on the accuracy of a commercial GOx-CGM. Data from 12 T1D participants in a randomized crossover trial to evaluate the effect of meal composition and alcohol consumption on postprandial glucose concentration were used. Absolute error (AE) and mean absolute relative difference (MARD) were calculated. The differences between the alcohol and nonalcohol scenarios were assessed using the Mann−Whitney U and Wilcoxon signed-rank tests. The AE in the alcohol study was low, but significantly greater as compared to the study without alcohol (p-value = 0.0418). The MARD was numerically but not significantly greater. However, both variables were greater at pH < 7.36 and significantly affected by time only in the alcohol arm. In T1D, alcohol consumption affects the accuracy of a GOx-CGM. This effect could be at least partially related to the ethanol-induced changes in pH.
连续血糖监测仪(CGM)改善了 1 型糖尿病(T1D)患者的管理,其中基于葡萄糖氧化酶(GOx)的传感器应用最为广泛。然而,它们可能会受到电化学和酶学干扰,包括与 pH 值变化有关的干扰。本研究旨在探讨乙醇(以啤酒形式摄入的乙醇)对商业 GOx-CGM 准确性的影响。该研究使用了一项随机交叉试验中 12 名 T1D 参与者的数据,以评估餐食组成和饮酒对餐后血糖浓度的影响。计算绝对误差(AE)和平均绝对相对差异(MARD)。使用 Mann-Whitney U 和 Wilcoxon 符号秩检验评估酒精和非酒精场景之间的差异。酒精研究中的 AE 较低,但与无酒精研究相比显著增加(p 值=0.0418)。MARD 在数值上略有增加,但无统计学意义。然而,这两个变量在 pH<7.36 时更大,并且仅在酒精组中受时间的显著影响。在 T1D 中,饮酒会影响 GOx-CGM 的准确性。这种影响至少部分可能与乙醇诱导的 pH 值变化有关。