• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估巴基斯坦北部奇特拉尔地区局部尺度的不同滑坡敏感性模型。

Evaluation of Different Landslide Susceptibility Models for a Local Scale in the Chitral District, Northern Pakistan.

机构信息

Department of Earth Sciences, Quaid-e-Azam University, Islamabad 45320, Pakistan.

Department of Civil Engineering, COMSATS University Islamabad, Wah Cantt 47040, Pakistan.

出版信息

Sensors (Basel). 2022 Apr 19;22(9):3107. doi: 10.3390/s22093107.

DOI:10.3390/s22093107
PMID:35590797
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9101762/
Abstract

This work evaluates the performance of three machine learning (ML) techniques, namely logistic regression (LGR), linear regression (LR), and support vector machines (SVM), and two multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) techniques, namely analytical hierarchy process (AHP) and the technique for order of preference by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS), for mapping landslide susceptibility in the Chitral district, northern Pakistan. Moreover, we create landslide inventory maps from LANDSAT-8 satellite images through the change vector analysis (CVA) change detection method. The change detection yields more than 500 landslide spots. After some manual post-processing correction, the landslide inventory spots are randomly split into two sets with a 70/30 ratio for training and validating the performance of the ML techniques. Sixteen topographical, hydrological, and geological landslide-related factors of the study area are prepared as GIS layers. They are used to produce landslide susceptibility maps (LSMs) with weighted overlay techniques using different weights of landslide-related factors. The accuracy assessment shows that the ML techniques outperform the MCDM methods, while SVM yields the highest accuracy of 88% for the resulting LSM.

摘要

本研究评估了三种机器学习(ML)技术,即逻辑回归(LGR)、线性回归(LR)和支持向量机(SVM),以及两种多准则决策(MCDM)技术,即层次分析法(AHP)和逼近理想解的排序方法(TOPSIS),在巴基斯坦北部奇特拉尔地区进行滑坡易发性制图的性能。此外,我们通过变化向量分析(CVA)变化检测方法从 LANDSAT-8 卫星图像中创建滑坡目录图。变化检测产生了 500 多个滑坡点。经过一些手动后处理校正,滑坡目录点随机分为两组,比例为 70/30,用于训练和验证 ML 技术的性能。研究区域的 16 个地形、水文和地质滑坡相关因素被制备为 GIS 层。它们用于使用滑坡相关因素的不同权重生成基于加权叠加技术的滑坡易发性图(LSM)。精度评估表明,ML 技术优于 MCDM 方法,而 SVM 对生成的 LSM 的准确率最高,达到 88%。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5ea7/9101762/1f7d849fb80b/sensors-22-03107-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5ea7/9101762/21c3e808926d/sensors-22-03107-g001a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5ea7/9101762/56bdf79cd2d2/sensors-22-03107-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5ea7/9101762/b9659f560c69/sensors-22-03107-g003a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5ea7/9101762/570e1f4f53c5/sensors-22-03107-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5ea7/9101762/202030d14560/sensors-22-03107-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5ea7/9101762/ea4c844aa3fe/sensors-22-03107-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5ea7/9101762/16a0be670ecd/sensors-22-03107-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5ea7/9101762/1f7d849fb80b/sensors-22-03107-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5ea7/9101762/21c3e808926d/sensors-22-03107-g001a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5ea7/9101762/56bdf79cd2d2/sensors-22-03107-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5ea7/9101762/b9659f560c69/sensors-22-03107-g003a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5ea7/9101762/570e1f4f53c5/sensors-22-03107-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5ea7/9101762/202030d14560/sensors-22-03107-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5ea7/9101762/ea4c844aa3fe/sensors-22-03107-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5ea7/9101762/16a0be670ecd/sensors-22-03107-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5ea7/9101762/1f7d849fb80b/sensors-22-03107-g008.jpg

相似文献

1
Evaluation of Different Landslide Susceptibility Models for a Local Scale in the Chitral District, Northern Pakistan.评估巴基斯坦北部奇特拉尔地区局部尺度的不同滑坡敏感性模型。
Sensors (Basel). 2022 Apr 19;22(9):3107. doi: 10.3390/s22093107.
2
Optimizing the Predictive Ability of Machine Learning Methods for Landslide Susceptibility Mapping Using SMOTE for Lishui City in Zhejiang Province, China.利用 SMOTE 优化机器学习方法在浙江省丽水市滑坡易发性制图中的预测能力。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Jan 28;16(3):368. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16030368.
3
Development of landslide susceptibility maps of Tripura, India using GIS and analytical hierarchy process (AHP).利用地理信息系统和层次分析法(AHP)制作印度特里普拉邦滑坡敏感性图
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2024 Jan;31(5):7481-7497. doi: 10.1007/s11356-023-31486-5. Epub 2023 Dec 30.
4
GIS-based landslide susceptibility mapping using logistic regression, random forest and decision and regression tree models in Chattogram District, Bangladesh.基于地理信息系统的滑坡易发性制图:在孟加拉国吉大港地区使用逻辑回归、随机森林以及决策树和回归树模型
Heliyon. 2023 Dec 9;10(1):e23424. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e23424. eCollection 2024 Jan 15.
5
Optimization of Causative Factors for Landslide Susceptibility Evaluation Using Remote Sensing and GIS Data in Parts of Niigata, Japan.利用日本新潟部分地区的遥感和地理信息系统数据优化滑坡易发性评估的影响因素
PLoS One. 2015 Jul 27;10(7):e0133262. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0133262. eCollection 2015.
6
A novel evolutionary combination of artificial intelligence algorithm and machine learning for landslide susceptibility mapping in the west of Iran.一种新型的人工智能算法和机器学习的进化组合,用于伊朗西部的滑坡易发性制图。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023 Dec;30(59):123527-123555. doi: 10.1007/s11356-023-30762-8. Epub 2023 Nov 21.
7
Comparison of Random Forest Model and Frequency Ratio Model for Landslide Susceptibility Mapping (LSM) in Yunyang County (Chongqing, China).随机森林模型与频率比模型在渝阳区(中国重庆)滑坡易发性制图(LSM)中的比较。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jun 12;17(12):4206. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17124206.
8
Landslide Susceptibility Mapping with Integrated SBAS-InSAR Technique: A Case Study of Dongchuan District, Yunnan (China).基于 SBAS-InSAR 技术的滑坡敏感性制图:以云南东川地区为例。
Sensors (Basel). 2022 Jul 26;22(15):5587. doi: 10.3390/s22155587.
9
GIS-based landslide susceptibility mapping in the Longmen Mountain area (China) using three different machine learning algorithms and their comparison.基于 GIS 的龙门山地区(中国)滑坡敏感性制图研究,使用三种不同的机器学习算法及其比较。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023 Aug;30(38):88612-88626. doi: 10.1007/s11356-023-28730-3. Epub 2023 Jul 13.
10
A GIS-based extended fuzzy multi-criteria evaluation for landslide susceptibility mapping.基于地理信息系统的扩展模糊多准则评价用于滑坡易发性制图。
Comput Geosci. 2014 Dec;73:208-221. doi: 10.1016/j.cageo.2014.08.001.

引用本文的文献

1
A semantic segmentation framework with UNet-pyramid for landslide prediction using remote sensing data.一种基于UNet金字塔的语义分割框架,用于利用遥感数据进行滑坡预测。
Sci Rep. 2024 Dec 3;14(1):30071. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-79266-6.
2
The TOPSIS method: Figuring the landslide susceptibility using Excel and GIS.TOPSIS 方法:使用 Excel 和 GIS 计算滑坡易发性
MethodsX. 2024 Oct 17;13:103005. doi: 10.1016/j.mex.2024.103005. eCollection 2024 Dec.

本文引用的文献

1
Effect of multiple climate change scenarios and predicted land-cover on soil erosion: a way forward for the better land management.多种气候变化情景和预测土地覆盖对土壤侵蚀的影响:更好的土地管理的一种途径。
Environ Monit Assess. 2021 Oct 28;193(11):754. doi: 10.1007/s10661-021-09559-0.
2
Performance evaluation of the GIS-based data mining techniques of best-first decision tree, random forest, and naïve Bayes tree for landslide susceptibility modeling.基于 GIS 的最佳优先决策树、随机森林和朴素贝叶斯树数据挖掘技术在滑坡易发性建模中的性能评价。
Sci Total Environ. 2018 Dec 10;644:1006-1018. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.06.389. Epub 2018 Jul 11.
3
Landslide susceptibility modelling using GIS-based machine learning techniques for Chongren County, Jiangxi Province, China.
基于 GIS 的机器学习技术在中国江西省崇仁县进行滑坡敏感性建模。
Sci Total Environ. 2018 Jun 1;626:1121-1135. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.01.124. Epub 2018 Feb 19.
4
Erodibility prioritization of sub-watersheds using morphometric parameters analysis and its mapping: A comparison among TOPSIS, VIKOR, SAW, and CF multi-criteria decision making models.利用形态计量参数分析对亚流域进行侵蚀性优先级排序及其制图:TOPSIS、VIKOR、SAW 和 CF 多准则决策模型的比较。
Sci Total Environ. 2018 Feb 1;613-614:1385-1400. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.09.210. Epub 2017 Oct 12.
5
An uncertainty and sensitivity analysis approach for GIS-based multicriteria landslide susceptibility mapping.一种基于地理信息系统的多准则滑坡易发性制图的不确定性和敏感性分析方法。
Int J Geogr Inf Sci. 2014 Mar 4;28(3):610-638. doi: 10.1080/13658816.2013.869821. Epub 2014 Jan 20.