Zimmerman M, Pfohl B, Stangl D
J Human Stress. 1986 Spring;12(1):13-9. doi: 10.1080/0097840X.1986.9936761.
Both self-report questionnaires and semi-structured interviews have been employed in past research on the association between life events and psychiatric disorder. We examined the comparability of these two approaches by giving both a self-report life events scale and semi-structured life events interview to 38 depressed patients. About 40% of the items noted on the interview were missed when using the questionnaire. Approximately 15% of the items noted on the questionnaire were errors since the events did not meet the definition or time criteria specified in the questionnaire. Twenty percent of the items noted on the questionnaire were not noted on the interview and may represent underinclusiveness on the part of the interview. The implications of these differences were examined by comparing the association between a variety of demographic and clinical variables and life events under each methodology. There were no significant differences between the two methods except when examining the association between life events and other subjective self-report measures.
在过去关于生活事件与精神障碍之间关联的研究中,自我报告问卷和半结构化访谈都有所应用。我们通过让38名抑郁症患者同时填写一份自我报告生活事件量表和进行半结构化生活事件访谈,来检验这两种方法的可比性。使用问卷时,访谈中记录的约40%的条目被遗漏。问卷中记录的约15%的条目存在错误,因为这些事件不符合问卷中规定的定义或时间标准。问卷中记录的20%的条目在访谈中未被提及,这可能表明访谈存在涵盖不足的情况。通过比较每种方法下各种人口统计学和临床变量与生活事件之间的关联,对这些差异的影响进行了研究。除了在检验生活事件与其他主观自我报告测量之间的关联时,两种方法之间没有显著差异。