• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一种接受度差异?欧盟媒体、公民和政策对自动驾驶汽车的看法

An acceptance divergence? Media, citizens and policy perspectives on autonomous cars in the European Union.

作者信息

Dos Santos Fabio Luis Marques, Duboz Amandine, Grosso Monica, Raposo María Alonso, Krause Jette, Mourtzouchou Andromachi, Balahur Alexandra, Ciuffo Biagio

机构信息

European Commission, Joint Research Centre (JRC), Ispra, Italy.

Department of Transportation and Projects and Processes Technology - University of Cantabria, Cantabria, Spain.

出版信息

Transp Res Part A Policy Pract. 2022 Apr;158:224-238. doi: 10.1016/j.tra.2022.02.013.

DOI:10.1016/j.tra.2022.02.013
PMID:35592136
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8988241/
Abstract

Do citizens, media and policymakers share the same view on autonomous cars? In the present paper, we analyse data from media articles, a Eurobarometer survey, and policy documents, to understand the perspective of different stakeholders when it comes to autonomous cars. We find significant differences between the groups, with a predominance of negative sentiments in news articles and a majority of citizens being wary of autonomous cars, while the political narrative mostly carries a positive tone. The findings highlight a dichotomous perspective about this potentially disruptive technology. This may represent a problem as the benefits of adopting autonomous cars will only come to surface if all actors are engaged and see the advantages they can bring to people's daily lives. We conclude by encouraging policymakers to promote initiatives to engage citizens in the transformation of road transport and other stakeholders to be advertised the positive implications of autonomous vehicles.

摘要

公民、媒体和政策制定者对自动驾驶汽车的看法是否一致?在本文中,我们分析了来自媒体文章、欧洲晴雨表调查和政策文件的数据,以了解不同利益相关者在自动驾驶汽车问题上的观点。我们发现不同群体之间存在显著差异,新闻文章中负面情绪占主导,大多数公民对自动驾驶汽车持谨慎态度,而政治叙事大多呈现积极基调。这些发现凸显了对于这项可能具有颠覆性的技术的二元观点。这可能会成为一个问题,因为只有当所有参与者都参与进来并看到自动驾驶汽车能给人们日常生活带来的好处时,采用自动驾驶汽车的益处才会显现出来。我们的结论是鼓励政策制定者推动相关举措,让公民参与到道路运输变革中来,并促使其他利益相关者宣传自动驾驶车辆的积极影响。

相似文献

1
An acceptance divergence? Media, citizens and policy perspectives on autonomous cars in the European Union.一种接受度差异?欧盟媒体、公民和政策对自动驾驶汽车的看法
Transp Res Part A Policy Pract. 2022 Apr;158:224-238. doi: 10.1016/j.tra.2022.02.013.
2
Trust in the European Union: Effects of the information environment.对欧盟的信任:信息环境的影响。
Eur J Commun. 2019 Feb;34(1):57-73. doi: 10.1177/0267323118810843. Epub 2018 Nov 20.
3
Who is to blame for crashes involving autonomous vehicles? Exploring blame attribution across the road transport system.谁应为自动驾驶汽车事故负责?探究道路运输系统中的责任归因。
Ergonomics. 2020 May;63(5):525-537. doi: 10.1080/00140139.2020.1744064. Epub 2020 Apr 3.
4
The politics and imaginary of 'autonomous vehicles': a participatory journey.“自动驾驶汽车”的政治与想象:一段参与式旅程。
Humanit Soc Sci Commun. 2022;9(1):284. doi: 10.1057/s41599-022-01209-1. Epub 2022 Aug 22.
5
Classical Liberalism, Discrimination, and the Problem of Autonomous Cars.古典自由主义、歧视与自动驾驶汽车问题
Sci Eng Ethics. 2020 Apr;26(2):931-946. doi: 10.1007/s11948-019-00155-7. Epub 2019 Nov 12.
6
Public acceptance and perception of autonomous vehicles: a comprehensive review.公众对自动驾驶汽车的接受度与认知:全面综述
AI Ethics. 2021;1(3):355-387. doi: 10.1007/s43681-021-00041-8. Epub 2021 Feb 26.
7
The Influence of Feelings While Driving Regular Cars on the Perception and Acceptance of Self-Driving Cars.驾驶普通汽车时的情感影响对自动驾驶汽车的感知和接受度的影响。
Risk Anal. 2019 Feb;39(2):358-374. doi: 10.1111/risa.13267. Epub 2019 Jan 16.
8
Australia in 2030: what is our path to health for all?2030 年的澳大利亚:全民健康之路在何方?
Med J Aust. 2021 May;214 Suppl 8:S5-S40. doi: 10.5694/mja2.51020.
9
The perils of perfect performance; considering the effects of introducing autonomous vehicles on rates of car vs cyclist conflict.完美表现的危险;考虑引入自动驾驶汽车对汽车与自行车碰撞事故发生率的影响。
Ergonomics. 2020 Aug;63(8):981-996. doi: 10.1080/00140139.2020.1739326. Epub 2020 Mar 18.
10
Implementation of a Potential Field-Based Decision-Making Algorithm on Autonomous Vehicles for Driving in Complex Environments.一种基于势场的决策算法在复杂环境中自动驾驶车辆上的实现
Sensors (Basel). 2019 Jul 28;19(15):3318. doi: 10.3390/s19153318.

引用本文的文献

1
Driver models for the definition of safety requirements of automated vehicles in international regulations. Application to motorway driving conditions.自动驾驶车辆安全要求国际法规中的驾驶员模型。高速公路驾驶条件下的应用。
Accid Anal Prev. 2022 Sep;174:106743. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2022.106743. Epub 2022 Jun 11.

本文引用的文献

1
Public Acceptance of Fully Automated Driving: Effects of Social Trust and Risk/Benefit Perceptions.公众对全自动驾驶的接受度:社会信任和风险/收益感知的影响。
Risk Anal. 2019 Feb;39(2):326-341. doi: 10.1111/risa.13143. Epub 2018 Jul 30.
2
Subgroups of adolescents differing in physical and social environmental preferences towards cycling for transport: A latent class analysis.青少年群体在物理和社会环境方面对自行车出行的偏好存在差异:一项潜在类别分析。
Prev Med. 2018 Jul;112:70-75. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2018.04.013. Epub 2018 Apr 7.
3
Psychosocial factors associated with intended use of automated vehicles: A simulated driving study.
与使用自动驾驶汽车意图相关的社会心理因素:一项模拟驾驶研究。
Accid Anal Prev. 2018 Jun;115:202-208. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2018.03.021. Epub 2018 Apr 6.
4
Characteristics of cyclist crashes in Italy using latent class analysis and association rule mining.运用潜在类别分析和关联规则挖掘法对意大利自行车事故特征的研究
PLoS One. 2017 Feb 3;12(2):e0171484. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0171484. eCollection 2017.
5
Differences in environmental preferences towards cycling for transport among adults: a latent class analysis.成年人对自行车作为出行交通工具的环境偏好差异:一项潜在类别分析
BMC Public Health. 2016 Aug 12;16:782. doi: 10.1186/s12889-016-3471-5.
6
A comparison of three clustering methods for finding subgroups in MRI, SMS or clinical data: SPSS TwoStep Cluster analysis, Latent Gold and SNOB.三种用于在MRI、短信或临床数据中寻找亚组的聚类方法比较:SPSS两步聚类分析、潜在类别分析软件Latent Gold和顺序节点导向二分法SNOB。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2014 Oct 2;14:113. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-14-113.