Suppr超能文献

与体育界反兴奋剂举报相关的行为和信念:一项跨国研究。

Behaviours and Beliefs Related to Whistleblowing Against Doping in Sport: A Cross-National Study.

作者信息

Bondarev Dmitriy, Barkoukis Vassilis, Lazuras Lambros, Bochaver Konstantin, Oudra Despoina, Theodorou Nikolaos

机构信息

Faculty of Sport and Health Sciences, University of Jyväskylä, Jyväskylä, Finland.

Department of Physical Education and Sport Sciences, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2022 May 3;13:835721. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.835721. eCollection 2022.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Whistleblowing has been recognized as an important deterrent of doping in elite competitive sport. The present study examined athletes' knowledge of external whistleblowing channels and on how and where to report doping misconduct, perceived trust in different whistleblowing reporting channels, whistleblowing behaviour and athletes' reasons for reporting (or not) doping misconduct.

METHODS

Athletes from Greece ( = 480), the Russian Federation ( = 512) and the United Kingdom ( = 171) completed a structured questionnaire on demographics, knowledge of different whistleblowing channels, perceived trust in internal and external whistleblowing channels, past whistleblowing behaviour and reasons for reporting (or not) doping misconduct.

RESULTS

The British athletes reported greater awareness of whistleblowing reporting channels (e.g., WADA's Speak Up and IOC's reporting platform) than did athletes from Greece (all  < 0.001) and Russia ( = 0.07, and  = 0.012) respectively. However, British athletes reported the lowest scores on knowledge of how and where to report doping misconduct, as compared to athletes from Greece and Russia. The majority of respondents reported greater trust to their coach or a club manager than to other whistleblowing channels, however, responses regarding other channels varied by country. Among athletes who detected doping misconduct 62% of athletes did not report it, while 38% reported it. Reasons for and against reporting doping misconduct reflected in eight themes that were identified using thematic analysis.

CONCLUSION

Athletes showed low awareness of external whistleblowing channels and they predominantly trusted internal whistleblowing channels. Sportspersonship, confidence in resources and personal benefits were among the reasons that facilitate reporting doping misconduct. The present findings indicate that cultural context may play a role in the ways athletes perceive whistleblowing, and this should be taken into account by future interventions to promote the reporting of doping misconduct.

摘要

背景

举报已被视为精英竞技体育中兴奋剂问题的一项重要威慑手段。本研究调查了运动员对外部举报渠道的了解情况,以及关于如何举报和向何处举报兴奋剂违规行为、对不同举报渠道的信任程度、举报行为以及运动员举报(或不举报)兴奋剂违规行为的原因。

方法

来自希腊(n = 480)、俄罗斯联邦(n = 512)和英国(n = 171)的运动员完成了一份结构化问卷,内容涉及人口统计学信息、对不同举报渠道的了解、对内部和外部举报渠道的信任程度、过去的举报行为以及举报(或不举报)兴奋剂违规行为的原因。

结果

与希腊运动员(所有p < 0.001)和俄罗斯运动员(p = 0.07,p = 0.012)相比,英国运动员对举报渠道(如世界反兴奋剂机构的“大声说出来”和国际奥委会的举报平台)的知晓度更高。然而,与希腊和俄罗斯的运动员相比,英国运动员在如何举报和向何处举报兴奋剂违规行为的知识方面得分最低。大多数受访者表示,比起其他举报渠道,他们更信任自己的教练或俱乐部经理,不过,对其他渠道的回答因国家而异。在发现兴奋剂违规行为的运动员中,62%的运动员未进行举报,而38%的运动员进行了举报。支持和反对举报兴奋剂违规行为的原因反映在通过主题分析确定的八个主题中。

结论

运动员对外部举报渠道的知晓度较低,他们主要信任内部举报渠道。体育精神、对资源的信心和个人利益是促使举报兴奋剂违规行为的部分原因。目前的研究结果表明,文化背景可能在运动员对举报的认知方式中发挥作用,未来促进举报兴奋剂违规行为的干预措施应考虑到这一点。

相似文献

5
Athlete doping confrontation efficacy and confrontation likelihood.运动员兴奋剂对抗效果和对抗可能性。
Psychol Sport Exerc. 2023 Mar;65:102370. doi: 10.1016/j.psychsport.2022.102370. Epub 2022 Dec 21.
8
The role of the athletes' entourage on attitudes to doping.运动员随队人员对兴奋剂态度的作用。
J Sports Sci. 2019 Nov;37(21):2483-2491. doi: 10.1080/02640414.2019.1643648. Epub 2019 Jul 31.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验