Faculty of Physical Education and Sport Science, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki , Thessaloniki , Greece.
School of Physiotherapy and Exercise Science, Curtin University , Perth , Australia.
J Sports Sci. 2019 Nov;37(21):2483-2491. doi: 10.1080/02640414.2019.1643648. Epub 2019 Jul 31.
The present study investigated athletes' and coaches' beliefs about the role of athletes' entourage in deterring or promoting doping. Competitive athletes and coaches in Greece and Australia took part in semi-structured interviews. Our analysis of the interviews produced five main themes: coach influence, peer influence, doping stance, doping stigma, and entourage's culture. Overall, coaches and peers having a close and trusty relationship with the athletes were considered most influential with respect to doping-related decisions. The majority of the athletes held a strong anti-doping stance but could not articulate why they held this position. This inability could be ascribed to the stigmatization of doping which led to lack of knowledge and anti-doping education. Finally, an anti-doping culture in the athletes' environment was considered central to an anti-doping stance. The study findings provide valuable information towards a comprehensive understanding of the role athletes' entourage can play in shaping athletes' attitudes and decision for doping.
本研究调查了运动员和教练对运动员随从在阻止或促进兴奋剂使用方面的作用的看法。来自希腊和澳大利亚的竞技运动员和教练参加了半结构化访谈。我们对访谈的分析产生了五个主要主题:教练的影响、同伴的影响、兴奋剂立场、兴奋剂污名和随从的文化。总的来说,与运动员关系密切且值得信赖的教练和同伴被认为对与兴奋剂相关的决策最具影响力。大多数运动员对兴奋剂采取了强烈的反对立场,但无法说明他们为何持有这种立场。这种无能可以归因于对兴奋剂的污名化,这导致了缺乏知识和反兴奋剂教育。最后,运动员环境中的反兴奋剂文化被认为是反兴奋剂立场的核心。研究结果为全面了解运动员随从在塑造运动员对兴奋剂的态度和决定方面可以发挥的作用提供了有价值的信息。