Suppr超能文献

远程强化咨询与门诊咨询对物质使用障碍的有效性:一项回顾性队列研究。

Effectiveness of Remote Intensive Counseling Versus Outpatient Counseling in Substance Use Disorders: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

作者信息

Ntchana Armand, Daley Ricky

机构信息

Family Medicine, Oceania University of Medicine, McAllen, USA.

Urology, United States Navy, Annapolis, USA.

出版信息

Cureus. 2022 Apr 15;14(4):e24167. doi: 10.7759/cureus.24167. eCollection 2022 Apr.

Abstract

Background Substance use disorders are a serious and persistent U.S. public health problem. Although a number of therapy modalities exist, few studies assessed the comparative effectiveness of specific therapies. This study empirically evaluated whether remote intensive counseling (RIC) is more effective than outpatient therapy (OT) in relapse prevention over the period of nine months in patients aged 18-45 years with a history of substance use. Methods The current study utilized a retrospective correlational cross-sectional cohort quantitative research design with multiple between-group comparisons and fixed effects. The sample (n=296) included adults of both sexes, of diverse racial/ethnic backgrounds, and of socioeconomic status (SES) between 18-45 years of age who had been using an illicit addictive substance(s) for at least six months prior and had never participated in any treatment program previously. Individuals with alcohol and/or nicotine co-dependence were excluded. Result and conclusion Remote intensive counseling (RIC) is more effective for patients aged 18-45 years with a history of substance use than outpatient therapy (OT). RIC works better for single or never married females younger than 30-year-old with higher education. The use of RIC for other age and racial/ethnic groups should be guided by whether patients belong to a younger age cohort and/or a specific race/ethnicity.

摘要

背景

物质使用障碍是美国一个严重且持续存在的公共卫生问题。尽管存在多种治疗方式,但很少有研究评估特定疗法的相对有效性。本研究通过实证评估远程强化咨询(RIC)在预防18 - 45岁有物质使用史患者复吸方面是否比门诊治疗(OT)在九个月期间更有效。

方法

本研究采用回顾性相关横断面队列定量研究设计,进行多组间比较和固定效应分析。样本(n = 296)包括18 - 45岁的成年男女,具有不同种族/族裔背景和社会经济地位(SES),他们在之前至少六个月内一直在使用非法成瘾物质,且此前从未参加过任何治疗项目。排除有酒精和/或尼古丁共依赖的个体。

结果与结论

对于有物质使用史的18 - 45岁患者,远程强化咨询(RIC)比门诊治疗(OT)更有效。RIC对30岁以下、单身或从未结婚、受过高等教育的女性效果更好。对于其他年龄和种族/族裔群体使用RIC应根据患者是否属于较年轻年龄组和/或特定种族/族裔来指导。

相似文献

6
9

本文引用的文献

1
Stimulants: How big is the problem and what are the effects of prenatal exposure?兴奋剂:问题有多大,产前暴露的影响是什么?
Semin Fetal Neonatal Med. 2019 Apr;24(2):155-160. doi: 10.1016/j.siny.2019.01.011. Epub 2019 Feb 5.
6
The Prescription Opioid Addiction Treatment Study: What have we learned.处方阿片类药物成瘾治疗研究:我们学到了什么。
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2017 Apr 1;173 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S48-S54. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2016.12.001.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验