Suppr超能文献

多维预后指数(MPI)简表的验证:BRIEF-MPI 项目。

Validation of Abbreviated Form of the Multidimensional Prognostic Index (MPI): The BRIEF-MPI Project.

机构信息

Department of Geriatric Care, Orthogeriatrics and Rehabilitation, E.O. Ospedali Galliera, Genova, Italy.

Geriatric Unit, Department of Internal Medicine and Geriatrics, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy.

出版信息

Clin Interv Aging. 2022 May 12;17:789-796. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S355801. eCollection 2022.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To screen multidimensional frailty in older people, using a comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) tool such as the multidimensional prognostic index (MPI), is a public health priority. Unfortunately, the screening tools available are not able to capture multidimensional frailty. In this work, we aimed to evaluate in a population of hospitalized and ambulatory older patients, the agreement between an abbreviated form of the MPI (ie, BRIEF-MPI) and the standard/full version.

PARTICIPANTS AND METHODS

All participants included in the study completed both versions of the MPI, brief and full, which share the following domains: 1) basic and 2) instrumental activities of daily living, 3) mobility/risk of pressure sores, 4) cognition, 5) nutrition, 6) comorbidity, 7) social and 8) number of medications. The agreement between the two instruments was reported using either the mean comparisons with a -test matched sample, a simple correlation analysis and the Bland-Altman methodology.

RESULTS

The study sample included 110 participants (mean age=83.2 years, 51.8% women). The mean difference was statistically and clinically irrelevant (mean difference=0.01±0.10; p=0.27). The correlation between brief and full MPI versions was optimal (R=0.82, p<0.0001). Using the Bland-Altman methodology, we observed that only three participants over 110 (=2.73%) were outside the limits of agreement. The accuracy of BRIEF-MPI in predicting multidimensional frailty, as full MPI>0.66, was optimal (area under the curve=0.92, p<0.0001). A BRIEF-MPI value of 0.59 yielded the highest sensitivity and specificity in predicting multidimensional frailty.

CONCLUSION

BRIEF-MPI had a good agreement with the full/standard version of the MPI, making this tool as ideal for the screening of multidimensional frailty in older people.

摘要

目的

使用综合老年评估(CGA)工具,如多维预后指数(MPI),对老年人进行多维虚弱筛查是公共卫生的重点。遗憾的是,现有的筛查工具无法捕捉多维虚弱。在这项工作中,我们旨在评估在住院和门诊老年患者人群中,缩短版 MPI(即 BRIEF-MPI)与标准/完整版本之间的一致性。

参与者和方法

所有纳入研究的参与者均完成了 MPI 的简短和完整版本,这两个版本共享以下领域:1)基本和 2)日常活动的工具,3)移动/压疮风险,4)认知,5)营养,6)合并症,7)社会和 8)药物数量。使用 -检验匹配样本的均值比较、简单相关分析和 Bland-Altman 方法报告两种仪器之间的一致性。

结果

研究样本包括 110 名参与者(平均年龄=83.2 岁,51.8%为女性)。平均差异在统计学和临床上无意义(平均差异=0.01±0.10;p=0.27)。简短和完整 MPI 版本之间的相关性是最佳的(R=0.82,p<0.0001)。使用 Bland-Altman 方法,我们观察到 110 名参与者中只有 3 名(=2.73%)超出了一致性范围。BRIEF-MPI 在预测多维虚弱方面的准确性,如完整 MPI>0.66,是最佳的(曲线下面积=0.92,p<0.0001)。BRIEF-MPI 值为 0.59 时,预测多维虚弱的敏感性和特异性最高。

结论

BRIEF-MPI 与 MPI 的完整/标准版本具有良好的一致性,使其成为筛查老年人多维虚弱的理想工具。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7c19/9112183/c1eba87ef973/CIA-17-789-g0001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验