Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Gazi University Faculty of Dentistry, Çankaya, Ankara, Turkey.
Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Dr. Abdurrahman Yurtaslan Onkoloji Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi, Yenimahalle, Ankara, Turkey.
Niger J Clin Pract. 2022 May;25(5):647-652. doi: 10.4103/njcp.njcp_1739_21.
Selecting the optimum nasal passage for nasotracheal intubation is quite important in the maxillofacial surgeries for the success of intubation and the reduction of potential complications such as nasal mucosal laceration, epistaxis, avulsion of the inferior and middle turbinates, and septal laceration.
The present study evaluates standard panoramic radiographs (PR) and posteroanterior cephalometric radiographs (PACR) to determine the optimal nasal passage for nasotracheal intubation and compares the results with those of routine anesthesiological occlusion and spatula tests (ST). The results of occlusion tests (OT), ST, and radiological assessments of 60 patients prior to nasotracheal intubation were compared with the nasal endoscopic assessment results, and complications were evaluated.
There was no significant association between the OT and nasal endoscopy results (P = 0.075). A significant association was found between the ST and nasal endoscopy results (P = 0.000), and between the radiological assessments and the nasal endoscopy results (P = 0.000). Compatibility with nasal endoscopy was 54% when the occlusion and ST were evaluated together, 75% when the OT and radiological assessments were evaluated together, and 86% when the ST and radiological assessments were evaluated together. The highest level of compatibility was 92% when all the tests were evaluated together.
The simple tests alone were found to be inadequate for the selection of the optimal nasal passage. Evaluation of PR and PACR, which are commonly used in maxillofacial surgeries, together with simple anesthesiological examination tests would increase nasotracheal intubation success and decrease complications.
在头面部手术中,选择最佳的鼻腔通道进行经鼻气管插管对于插管的成功和减少潜在并发症(如鼻黏膜撕裂、鼻出血、中下鼻甲撕脱和鼻中隔撕裂)非常重要。
本研究通过评估标准全景 X 光片(PR)和前后位头颅侧位片(PACR)来确定经鼻气管插管的最佳鼻腔通道,并将结果与常规麻醉学阻塞和压舌板测试(ST)进行比较。在进行经鼻气管插管前,对 60 例患者的阻塞测试(OT)、ST 和影像学评估结果与鼻内镜评估结果进行比较,并评估并发症。
OT 与鼻内镜结果之间无显著相关性(P = 0.075)。ST 与鼻内镜结果之间存在显著相关性(P = 0.000),以及影像学评估与鼻内镜结果之间存在显著相关性(P = 0.000)。当同时评估阻塞和 ST 时,与鼻内镜的兼容性为 54%,当同时评估 OT 和影像学评估时,为 75%,当同时评估 ST 和影像学评估时,为 86%。当所有测试一起评估时,最高兼容性为 92%。
单独使用简单测试被发现不足以选择最佳的鼻腔通道。评估 PR 和 PACR,这些在头面部手术中常用的测试,与简单的麻醉学检查测试一起使用,可以提高经鼻气管插管的成功率并减少并发症。