Department of Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Necmettin Erbakan University, Konya, Turkey.
Department of Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Yildirim Beyazit University, Ankara, Turkey.
Niger J Clin Pract. 2022 May;25(5):670-676. doi: 10.4103/njcp.njcp_1877_21.
Irrigant activation techniques, which are more effective in anatomically complex areas, can be used to maximize irrigant efficacy.
This in vitro study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of different agitation techniques on the dislocation resistance of Biodentine to the root canal dentin.
Seventy single-rooted teeth divided into seven experimental groups (n = 10); Group I-Irritrol/Photon-induced-photoacoustic-streaming (PIPS), Group II-Irritrol/EDDY, Group III- Irritrol/Syringe-needle-irrigation (SNI), Group IV-Chlorhexidine-gluconate (CHX)/PIPS, Group V-CHX/EDDY, Group VI-CHX/SNI, Group VII-Saline. The midroot dentin slice was obtained from each tooth, and Biodentine was condensed with hand pluggers into the root canal lumen. The push-out bond strength values were measured using a universal testing machine. Each sample was categorized into one of the three failure modes: adhesive/cohesive/mixed. Scanning-Electron-Microscopy (SEM) was used to conduct the analyses, and the composition of Biodentine was analyzed using Energy-Dispersive Spectroscopy. The One-way ANOVA, post-hoc Tukey's test, and the Chi-square test were used for statistical analysis.
The push-out bond strength values of Biodentine showed that Group VII-Saline had a statistically significant difference (P = 0.002), however, the differences between the other groups were not statistically significant (P = 0.922). The percentages of the failure modes of the samples showed that there was a higher rate of mixed failure except for Group VII-Saline. SEM examination showed that Group VII-Saline had no open dentinal tubules, whereas the other groups, particularly the Irritrol groups, had open dentinal tubule areas.
Within the scope of the study, using Irritrol or CHX as the final irrigation in the root canal treatment did not result in differences in the dislocation resistance of Biodentine to root canal dentin when PIPS and EDDY were used.
在解剖结构复杂的区域,冲洗激活技术更为有效,可最大限度地提高冲洗液的功效。
本体外研究旨在评估不同搅拌技术对 Biodentine 与根管牙本质脱位阻力的影响。
将 70 颗单根牙分为 7 个实验组(n=10);I 组-Irritrol/光诱导光声流(PIPS)、II 组-Irritrol/EDDY、III 组-Irritrol/注射器-针头冲洗(SNI)、IV 组-洗必泰葡萄糖酸盐(CHX)/PIPS、V 组-CHX/EDDY、VI 组-CHX/SNI、VII 组-生理盐水。从每颗牙的根管中部获得牙本质切片,用手插塞器将 Biodentine 压入根管腔。使用万能试验机测量推出粘结强度值。将每个样本分为以下三种失效模式之一:粘结/内聚/混合。使用扫描电子显微镜(SEM)进行分析,并使用能谱分析(EDS)分析 Biodentine 的组成。采用单因素方差分析、事后 Tukey 检验和卡方检验进行统计学分析。
Biodentine 的推出粘结强度值显示,VII 组-生理盐水有统计学显著差异(P=0.002),而其他组之间无统计学差异(P=0.922)。样本失效模式的百分比显示,除 VII 组-生理盐水外,混合失效的比例更高。SEM 检查显示,VII 组-生理盐水无开放的牙本质小管,而其他组,特别是 Irritrol 组,有开放的牙本质小管区域。
在本研究范围内,在使用 PIPS 和 EDDY 时,根管治疗中最后冲洗用 Irritrol 或 CHX 不会导致 Biodentine 对根管牙本质脱位阻力的差异。