City of Helsinki Health Centre, University Dental Clinic, Helsinki, Finland.
Department of Biomaterials Science and Turku Clinical Biomaterials Centre-TCBC, Institute of Dentistry, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.
Dent Mater. 2021 Feb;37(2):328-335. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2020.11.031. Epub 2020 Dec 17.
To evaluate the long-term effect of chlorhexidine (CHX) and dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) on the sealing ability and biomineralization of two different calcium silicate cements (CSC) in root canal.
Sixty human third molar root canals were obturated with ProRoot MTA or Biodentine. Before obturation the canals were irrigated with saline (control), 2% CHX or 5% DMSO. Microleakage was tested after three days and after six months. After additional six months (12 months after root filling) the roots were cut into 2 mm thick dentine discs. The discs were stored in artificial saliva for one year. The bond strength was measured with the push-out method, and the failure mode was evaluated with a stereomicroscope. The most apical disc of each tooth was used for Vickers hardness test.
No significant differences between the groups was found in initial microleakage. The leakage increased significantly during the 6-month storage in all groups except in Biodentine-CHX group and Biodentine-DMSO group. CHX and DMSO irrigation significantly increased the leakage with ProRoot MTA with time, but there was no statistically significant difference compared to the ProRoot MTA-control group at six months' time point. CHX significantly reduced the push-out bond strength of ProRoot MTA. With Biodentine irrigation with CHX or DMSO resulted with significantly higher push-out strength compared to the Biodentine control group. Fracture analysis showed statistically significant difference in the distribution of the fractures between the groups, but neither CHX nor DMSO change the fracture pattern statistically significantly. With Vickers hardness test ProRoot MTA with and without DMSO as the final irrigant showed significantly higher dentin hardness than any Biodentine-group.
Considering that aging increased the leakage in all groups except with Biodentine-DMSO and the differences in the push-out strength and surface microhardness data, it appears that the time-related biomineralizing effect of MTA and Biodentine does not improve sealing to dentin. CHX significantly reduced ProRoot MTA bond strength and increased pure adhesive failures with both cements.
评估洗必泰(CHX)和二甲基亚砜(DMSO)对 2 种不同硅酸钙水泥(CSC)在根管中封闭能力和生物矿化能力的长期影响。
60 个人类第三磨牙根管用 ProRoot MTA 或 Biodentine 进行封闭。封闭前,用生理盐水(对照)、2% CHX 或 5% DMSO 冲洗根管。3 天后和 6 个月后进行微渗漏测试。在额外的 6 个月(根管充填后 12 个月)后,将根切成 2mm 厚的牙本质片。将牙本质片储存在人工唾液中 1 年。用推出法测量粘结强度,并通过体视显微镜评估失效模式。每颗牙最根尖的牙本质片用于维氏硬度测试。
初始微渗漏各组间无显著差异。除 Biodentine-CHX 组和 Biodentine-DMSO 组外,所有组在 6 个月储存期间渗漏均显著增加。CHX 和 DMSO 冲洗随着时间的推移显著增加了 ProRoot MTA 的渗漏,但与 ProRoot MTA 对照组在 6 个月时无统计学差异。CHX 显著降低了 ProRoot MTA 的推出粘结强度。与 Biodentine 对照组相比,Biodentine 冲洗用 CHX 或 DMSO 处理的 ProRoot MTA 具有更高的推出强度。断裂分析显示,各组间的断裂分布存在统计学差异,但 CHX 和 DMSO 均未使断裂模式发生统计学显著变化。维氏硬度测试显示,无论是否使用 DMSO 作为最终冲洗液,ProRoot MTA 的牙本质硬度均显著高于任何 Biodentine 组。
考虑到除 Biodentine-DMSO 组外,老化增加了所有组的渗漏,以及推出强度和表面显微硬度数据的差异,似乎 MTA 和 Biodentine 的与时间相关的生物矿化作用并不能改善对牙本质的封闭。CHX 显著降低了 ProRoot MTA 的粘结强度,并增加了两种水泥的纯黏附性失效。