文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期,新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

缺乏遗传性检测指南的癌症类型的肿瘤中种系检测结果的流行率。

Prevalence of Germline Findings Among Tumors From Cancer Types Lacking Hereditary Testing Guidelines.

机构信息

Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics, Division of Cancer Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston.

Tempus Labs Inc, Chicago, Illinois.

出版信息

JAMA Netw Open. 2022 May 2;5(5):e2213070. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.13070.


DOI:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.13070
PMID:35594047
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9123503/
Abstract

IMPORTANCE: Germline testing guidelines are suggested for specific disease types or a family history of cancer, yet alterations are found in cancer types in which germline testing is not routinely indicated. The clinical role of identifying germline variants in these populations is valuable to patients and their at-risk relatives. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the prevalence of germline findings in patients undergoing tumor/normal matched sequencing among cancer types lacking guidelines. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This retrospective cross-sectional study took place on August 18, 2021, and included data from deidentified records of patients tested, using the Tempus xT tumor/normal matched approach from November 2017 to August 2021. Records included in this study were from 34 642 patients treated in geographically diverse oncology practices in the US with a diagnosis of any of the following cancers: bladder, brain, lung, esophagus, cholangiocarcinoma, head and neck, breast, ovarian, pancreatic, prostate, endometrial, and colorectal. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The rate of germline findings (ie, single-nucleotide variants and small insertions or deletions) detected in 50 reportable hereditary cancer genes was calculated for cancer types lacking guidelines for germline testing (bladder, brain, lung, esophagus, cholangiocarcinoma, and head and neck) and cancer types for which germline testing is frequently performed (breast, ovarian, pancreatic, prostate, endometrial, and colorectal). Same-gene second somatic hits were assessed to provide a comprehensive assessment on genomic drivers. RESULTS: Of 34 642 patients, 18 888 were female (54.5%); of 27 498 patients whose age at diagnosis was known, mean (SD) age was 62.23 (3.36) years. A total of 2534 of 34 642 patients (7.3%) harbored pathogenic or likely pathogenic germline variants. Within the tumor types lacking testing guidelines, germline mutations were at 6.6% (79/1188) in bladder cancer and 5.8% (448/7668) in lung cancer. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: This study may present the largest retrospective analysis to date of deidentified real-world data from patients diagnosed with advanced cancer with tumor/normal matched sequencing data and the prevalence of pathogenic or likely pathogenic germline variants in cancer types lacking hereditary cancer testing guidelines. The findings suggest there may be clinical implications for patients and their at-risk family members in cancers for which germline assessment primarily based on the cancer diagnosis is rarely obtained.

摘要

重要性:胚系检测指南针对特定疾病类型或癌症家族史建议,但在常规不建议胚系检测的癌症类型中也发现了改变。在这些人群中确定胚系变异的临床作用对患者及其高危亲属是有价值的。

目的:评估在缺乏指南的癌症类型中,接受肿瘤/正常匹配测序的患者中胚系检测结果的发生率。

设计、设置和参与者:这是一项回顾性横断面研究,于 2021 年 8 月 18 日进行,纳入了 2017 年 11 月至 2021 年 8 月期间使用 Tempus xT 肿瘤/正常匹配方法检测的患者的匿名记录数据。本研究中的记录来自美国地理上多样化的肿瘤学实践中诊断为以下任何一种癌症的 34642 名患者:膀胱癌、脑癌、肺癌、食管癌、胆管癌、头颈部癌、乳腺癌、卵巢癌、胰腺癌、前列腺癌、子宫内膜癌和结直肠癌。

主要结局和测量:对于缺乏胚系检测指南的癌症类型(膀胱癌、脑癌、肺癌、食管癌、胆管癌和头颈部癌)和经常进行胚系检测的癌症类型(乳腺癌、卵巢癌、胰腺癌、前列腺癌、子宫内膜癌和结直肠癌),计算在 50 个可报告的遗传性癌症基因中检测到的胚系检测结果(单核苷酸变异和小插入或缺失)的发生率。评估相同基因的第二次体细胞突变,以提供对基因组驱动因素的全面评估。

结果:在 34642 名患者中,1888 名(54.5%)为女性;在已知诊断时年龄的 27498 名患者中,平均(SD)年龄为 62.23(3.36)岁。在 34642 名患者中,共有 2534 名(7.3%)携带致病性或可能致病性的胚系变异。在缺乏检测指南的肿瘤类型中,膀胱癌的胚系突变率为 6.6%(79/1188),肺癌为 5.8%(448/7668)。

结论和相关性:本研究可能是迄今为止对接受肿瘤/正常匹配测序的晚期癌症患者的匿名真实世界数据进行的最大回顾性分析,以及缺乏遗传性癌症检测指南的癌症类型中致病性或可能致病性胚系变异的发生率。研究结果表明,在主要基于癌症诊断很少获得胚系评估的癌症中,可能对患者及其高危家庭成员具有临床意义。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c9b2/9123503/9979bfbff253/jamanetwopen-e2213070-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c9b2/9123503/49ff44a4e1ed/jamanetwopen-e2213070-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c9b2/9123503/9979bfbff253/jamanetwopen-e2213070-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c9b2/9123503/49ff44a4e1ed/jamanetwopen-e2213070-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c9b2/9123503/9979bfbff253/jamanetwopen-e2213070-g002.jpg

相似文献

[1]
Prevalence of Germline Findings Among Tumors From Cancer Types Lacking Hereditary Testing Guidelines.

JAMA Netw Open. 2022-5-2

[2]
Yield and Utility of Germline Testing Following Tumor Sequencing in Patients With Cancer.

JAMA Netw Open. 2020-10-1

[3]
Prevalence of Germline Variants in Prostate Cancer and Implications for Current Genetic Testing Guidelines.

JAMA Oncol. 2019-4-1

[4]
Detection of Pathogenic Germline Variants Among Patients With Advanced Colorectal Cancer Undergoing Tumor Genomic Profiling for Precision Medicine.

Dis Colon Rectum. 2019-4

[5]
Prevalence and Landscape of Pathogenic or Likely Pathogenic Germline Variants and Their Association With Somatic Phenotype in Unselected Chinese Patients With Gynecologic Cancers.

JAMA Netw Open. 2023-7-3

[6]
Mutation Detection in Patients With Advanced Cancer by Universal Sequencing of Cancer-Related Genes in Tumor and Normal DNA vs Guideline-Based Germline Testing.

JAMA. 2017-9-5

[7]
Clinical Utility of Universal Germline Genetic Testing for Patients With Breast Cancer.

JAMA Netw Open. 2022-9-1

[8]
[Susceptibility study on the germline rare variants of bromodomain and extraterminal domain protein family-encoding genes and patients with cancer living in some regions of China].

Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2022-11-15

[9]
A review of the cost-effectiveness of genetic testing for germline variants in familial cancer.

J Med Econ. 2023

[10]
Risk of Syndrome-Associated Cancers Among First-Degree Relatives of Patients With Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma With Pathogenic or Likely Pathogenic Germline Variants.

JAMA Oncol. 2023-7-1

引用本文的文献

[1]
Germline pathogenic variants detected by GenMineTOP: insight from a nationwide tumor/normal paired comprehensive genomic profiling test, in Japan.

J Hum Genet. 2025-9-9

[2]
Detecting likely germline variants during tumor-based molecular profiling.

J Clin Invest. 2025-8-1

[3]
The usefulness of comprehensive genome profiling test in screening of Lynch syndrome independent of the conventional clinical screening or microsatellite instability tests.

J Hum Genet. 2025-5-8

[4]
Genome Sequencing of Rare Disease Patients Through the Korean Regional Rare Disease Diagnostic Support Program.

Hum Mutat. 2025-2-27

[5]
Establishment of a comprehensive set of fact sheets for cancer predisposition genes for medical oncologists practicing cancer genome profiling.

Int J Clin Oncol. 2025-5

[6]
Genomic Landscapes of Early-Onset Versus Average-Onset Colorectal Cancer Populations.

Cancers (Basel). 2025-2-28

[7]
Liquid biopsy for evaluating mutations and chromosomal aberrations in cerebrospinal fluid from patients with primary or metastatic CNS tumors.

J Liq Biopsy. 2024-12-1

[8]
Association of Germline Pathogenic Variants in and Other DNA Damage Response Genes With Lung Cancer Risk Among Non-Hispanic Whites and African Americans.

JCO Precis Oncol. 2025-1

[9]
Real-world clinical multi-omics analyses reveal bifurcation of ER-independent and ER-dependent drug resistance to CDK4/6 inhibitors.

Nat Commun. 2025-1-22

[10]
Clinician perspectives on designing and implementing a hereditary cancer transition clinic.

Hered Cancer Clin Pract. 2025-1-11

本文引用的文献

[1]
Clinical Utilization, Utility, and Reimbursement for Expanded Genomic Panel Testing in Adult Oncology.

JCO Precis Oncol. 2020-11

[2]
Therapeutic Implications of Germline Testing in Patients With Advanced Cancers.

J Clin Oncol. 2021-8-20

[3]
Adjuvant Olaparib for Patients with - or -Mutated Breast Cancer.

N Engl J Med. 2021-6-24

[4]
Assessment of Clinical Benefit of Integrative Genomic Profiling in Advanced Solid Tumors.

JAMA Oncol. 2021-4-1

[5]
Comparison of Universal Genetic Testing vs Guideline-Directed Targeted Testing for Patients With Hereditary Cancer Syndrome.

JAMA Oncol. 2021-2-1

[6]
Yield and Utility of Germline Testing Following Tumor Sequencing in Patients With Cancer.

JAMA Netw Open. 2020-10-1

[7]
First-in-Human Trial of the Oral Ataxia Telangiectasia and RAD3-Related (ATR) Inhibitor BAY 1895344 in Patients with Advanced Solid Tumors.

Cancer Discov. 2021-1

[8]
Phase I Trial of First-in-Class ATR Inhibitor M6620 (VX-970) as Monotherapy or in Combination With Carboplatin in Patients With Advanced Solid Tumors.

J Clin Oncol. 2020-9-20

[9]
Molecular profiling for precision cancer therapies.

Genome Med. 2020-1-14

[10]
Integrated genomic profiling expands clinical options for patients with cancer.

Nat Biotechnol. 2019-9-30

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索