• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

缺乏遗传性检测指南的癌症类型的肿瘤中种系检测结果的流行率。

Prevalence of Germline Findings Among Tumors From Cancer Types Lacking Hereditary Testing Guidelines.

机构信息

Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics, Division of Cancer Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston.

Tempus Labs Inc, Chicago, Illinois.

出版信息

JAMA Netw Open. 2022 May 2;5(5):e2213070. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.13070.

DOI:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.13070
PMID:35594047
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9123503/
Abstract

IMPORTANCE

Germline testing guidelines are suggested for specific disease types or a family history of cancer, yet alterations are found in cancer types in which germline testing is not routinely indicated. The clinical role of identifying germline variants in these populations is valuable to patients and their at-risk relatives.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the prevalence of germline findings in patients undergoing tumor/normal matched sequencing among cancer types lacking guidelines.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This retrospective cross-sectional study took place on August 18, 2021, and included data from deidentified records of patients tested, using the Tempus xT tumor/normal matched approach from November 2017 to August 2021. Records included in this study were from 34 642 patients treated in geographically diverse oncology practices in the US with a diagnosis of any of the following cancers: bladder, brain, lung, esophagus, cholangiocarcinoma, head and neck, breast, ovarian, pancreatic, prostate, endometrial, and colorectal.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

The rate of germline findings (ie, single-nucleotide variants and small insertions or deletions) detected in 50 reportable hereditary cancer genes was calculated for cancer types lacking guidelines for germline testing (bladder, brain, lung, esophagus, cholangiocarcinoma, and head and neck) and cancer types for which germline testing is frequently performed (breast, ovarian, pancreatic, prostate, endometrial, and colorectal). Same-gene second somatic hits were assessed to provide a comprehensive assessment on genomic drivers.

RESULTS

Of 34 642 patients, 18 888 were female (54.5%); of 27 498 patients whose age at diagnosis was known, mean (SD) age was 62.23 (3.36) years. A total of 2534 of 34 642 patients (7.3%) harbored pathogenic or likely pathogenic germline variants. Within the tumor types lacking testing guidelines, germline mutations were at 6.6% (79/1188) in bladder cancer and 5.8% (448/7668) in lung cancer.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

This study may present the largest retrospective analysis to date of deidentified real-world data from patients diagnosed with advanced cancer with tumor/normal matched sequencing data and the prevalence of pathogenic or likely pathogenic germline variants in cancer types lacking hereditary cancer testing guidelines. The findings suggest there may be clinical implications for patients and their at-risk family members in cancers for which germline assessment primarily based on the cancer diagnosis is rarely obtained.

摘要

重要性

胚系检测指南针对特定疾病类型或癌症家族史建议,但在常规不建议胚系检测的癌症类型中也发现了改变。在这些人群中确定胚系变异的临床作用对患者及其高危亲属是有价值的。

目的

评估在缺乏指南的癌症类型中,接受肿瘤/正常匹配测序的患者中胚系检测结果的发生率。

设计、设置和参与者:这是一项回顾性横断面研究,于 2021 年 8 月 18 日进行,纳入了 2017 年 11 月至 2021 年 8 月期间使用 Tempus xT 肿瘤/正常匹配方法检测的患者的匿名记录数据。本研究中的记录来自美国地理上多样化的肿瘤学实践中诊断为以下任何一种癌症的 34642 名患者:膀胱癌、脑癌、肺癌、食管癌、胆管癌、头颈部癌、乳腺癌、卵巢癌、胰腺癌、前列腺癌、子宫内膜癌和结直肠癌。

主要结局和测量

对于缺乏胚系检测指南的癌症类型(膀胱癌、脑癌、肺癌、食管癌、胆管癌和头颈部癌)和经常进行胚系检测的癌症类型(乳腺癌、卵巢癌、胰腺癌、前列腺癌、子宫内膜癌和结直肠癌),计算在 50 个可报告的遗传性癌症基因中检测到的胚系检测结果(单核苷酸变异和小插入或缺失)的发生率。评估相同基因的第二次体细胞突变,以提供对基因组驱动因素的全面评估。

结果

在 34642 名患者中,1888 名(54.5%)为女性;在已知诊断时年龄的 27498 名患者中,平均(SD)年龄为 62.23(3.36)岁。在 34642 名患者中,共有 2534 名(7.3%)携带致病性或可能致病性的胚系变异。在缺乏检测指南的肿瘤类型中,膀胱癌的胚系突变率为 6.6%(79/1188),肺癌为 5.8%(448/7668)。

结论和相关性

本研究可能是迄今为止对接受肿瘤/正常匹配测序的晚期癌症患者的匿名真实世界数据进行的最大回顾性分析,以及缺乏遗传性癌症检测指南的癌症类型中致病性或可能致病性胚系变异的发生率。研究结果表明,在主要基于癌症诊断很少获得胚系评估的癌症中,可能对患者及其高危家庭成员具有临床意义。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c9b2/9123503/9979bfbff253/jamanetwopen-e2213070-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c9b2/9123503/49ff44a4e1ed/jamanetwopen-e2213070-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c9b2/9123503/9979bfbff253/jamanetwopen-e2213070-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c9b2/9123503/49ff44a4e1ed/jamanetwopen-e2213070-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c9b2/9123503/9979bfbff253/jamanetwopen-e2213070-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Prevalence of Germline Findings Among Tumors From Cancer Types Lacking Hereditary Testing Guidelines.缺乏遗传性检测指南的癌症类型的肿瘤中种系检测结果的流行率。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 May 2;5(5):e2213070. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.13070.
2
Yield and Utility of Germline Testing Following Tumor Sequencing in Patients With Cancer.癌症患者肿瘤测序后种系检测的产量和效用。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Oct 1;3(10):e2019452. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.19452.
3
Prevalence of Germline Variants in Prostate Cancer and Implications for Current Genetic Testing Guidelines.前列腺癌种系变异的流行情况及其对当前遗传检测指南的影响。
JAMA Oncol. 2019 Apr 1;5(4):523-528. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2018.6760.
4
Detection of Pathogenic Germline Variants Among Patients With Advanced Colorectal Cancer Undergoing Tumor Genomic Profiling for Precision Medicine.在为精准医疗对接受肿瘤基因组分析的晚期结直肠癌患者进行肿瘤基因组分析时,检测致病性种系变异。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2019 Apr;62(4):429-437. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000001322.
5
Prevalence and Landscape of Pathogenic or Likely Pathogenic Germline Variants and Their Association With Somatic Phenotype in Unselected Chinese Patients With Gynecologic Cancers.未选择的中国妇科癌症患者种种系致病性或可能致病性变体的流行情况及其与体细胞表型的相关性。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Jul 3;6(7):e2326437. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.26437.
6
Mutation Detection in Patients With Advanced Cancer by Universal Sequencing of Cancer-Related Genes in Tumor and Normal DNA vs Guideline-Based Germline Testing.通过对肿瘤和正常DNA中癌症相关基因进行通用测序与基于指南的种系检测对晚期癌症患者进行突变检测
JAMA. 2017 Sep 5;318(9):825-835. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.11137.
7
Clinical Utility of Universal Germline Genetic Testing for Patients With Breast Cancer.乳腺癌患者进行通用种系基因检测的临床实用性。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Sep 1;5(9):e2232787. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.32787.
8
[Susceptibility study on the germline rare variants of bromodomain and extraterminal domain protein family-encoding genes and patients with cancer living in some regions of China].[中国部分地区癌症患者中溴结构域和额外末端结构域蛋白家族编码基因种系罕见变异的易感性研究]
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2022 Nov 15;102(42):3374-3381. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112137-20220620-01352.
9
A review of the cost-effectiveness of genetic testing for germline variants in familial cancer.家族性癌症中胚系变异的遗传检测成本效益评价综述。
J Med Econ. 2023 Jan-Dec;26(1):19-33. doi: 10.1080/13696998.2022.2152233.
10
Risk of Syndrome-Associated Cancers Among First-Degree Relatives of Patients With Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma With Pathogenic or Likely Pathogenic Germline Variants.胰腺导管腺癌患者携带致病性或疑似致病性种系变异的一级亲属患综合征相关癌症的风险。
JAMA Oncol. 2023 Jul 1;9(7):955-961. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2023.0806.

引用本文的文献

1
Germline pathogenic variants detected by GenMineTOP: insight from a nationwide tumor/normal paired comprehensive genomic profiling test, in Japan.通过GenMineTOP检测到的种系致病变异:来自日本全国肿瘤/正常组织配对综合基因组分析测试的见解。
J Hum Genet. 2025 Sep 9. doi: 10.1038/s10038-025-01389-z.
2
Detecting likely germline variants during tumor-based molecular profiling.在基于肿瘤的分子谱分析过程中检测可能的种系变异。
J Clin Invest. 2025 Aug 1;135(15). doi: 10.1172/JCI190264.
3
The usefulness of comprehensive genome profiling test in screening of Lynch syndrome independent of the conventional clinical screening or microsatellite instability tests.

本文引用的文献

1
Clinical Utilization, Utility, and Reimbursement for Expanded Genomic Panel Testing in Adult Oncology.成人肿瘤学中扩展基因组检测的临床应用、效用及报销情况
JCO Precis Oncol. 2020 Nov;4:1038-1048. doi: 10.1200/PO.20.00048.
2
Therapeutic Implications of Germline Testing in Patients With Advanced Cancers.胚系基因检测在晚期癌症患者中的治疗意义。
J Clin Oncol. 2021 Aug 20;39(24):2698-2709. doi: 10.1200/JCO.20.03661. Epub 2021 Jun 16.
3
Adjuvant Olaparib for Patients with - or -Mutated Breast Cancer.奥拉帕利辅助治疗 - 或 - 突变型乳腺癌患者。
综合基因组分析检测在独立于传统临床筛查或微卫星不稳定性检测的林奇综合征筛查中的实用性。
J Hum Genet. 2025 May 8. doi: 10.1038/s10038-025-01345-x.
4
Genome Sequencing of Rare Disease Patients Through the Korean Regional Rare Disease Diagnostic Support Program.通过韩国地区罕见病诊断支持项目对罕见病患者进行基因组测序。
Hum Mutat. 2025 Feb 27;2025:6096758. doi: 10.1155/humu/6096758. eCollection 2025.
5
Establishment of a comprehensive set of fact sheets for cancer predisposition genes for medical oncologists practicing cancer genome profiling.为从事癌症基因组分析的医学肿瘤学家建立一套关于癌症易感基因的综合情况说明书。
Int J Clin Oncol. 2025 May;30(5):827-836. doi: 10.1007/s10147-025-02746-w. Epub 2025 Apr 4.
6
Genomic Landscapes of Early-Onset Versus Average-Onset Colorectal Cancer Populations.早发性与平均发病年龄结直肠癌人群的基因组图谱
Cancers (Basel). 2025 Feb 28;17(5):836. doi: 10.3390/cancers17050836.
7
Liquid biopsy for evaluating mutations and chromosomal aberrations in cerebrospinal fluid from patients with primary or metastatic CNS tumors.用于评估原发性或转移性中枢神经系统肿瘤患者脑脊液中突变和染色体畸变的液体活检。
J Liq Biopsy. 2024 Dec 1;6:100281. doi: 10.1016/j.jlb.2024.100281. eCollection 2024 Dec.
8
Association of Germline Pathogenic Variants in and Other DNA Damage Response Genes With Lung Cancer Risk Among Non-Hispanic Whites and African Americans.非西班牙裔白人和非裔美国人中BRCA1和其他DNA损伤反应基因的种系致病性变异与肺癌风险的关联。
JCO Precis Oncol. 2025 Jan;9:e2400558. doi: 10.1200/PO-24-00558. Epub 2025 Jan 24.
9
Real-world clinical multi-omics analyses reveal bifurcation of ER-independent and ER-dependent drug resistance to CDK4/6 inhibitors.真实世界临床多组学分析揭示了对CDK4/6抑制剂不依赖雌激素受体和依赖雌激素受体的耐药性分歧。
Nat Commun. 2025 Jan 22;16(1):932. doi: 10.1038/s41467-025-55914-x.
10
Clinician perspectives on designing and implementing a hereditary cancer transition clinic.临床医生对遗传性癌症转诊诊所设计与实施的看法。
Hered Cancer Clin Pract. 2025 Jan 11;23(1):2. doi: 10.1186/s13053-024-00304-5.
N Engl J Med. 2021 Jun 24;384(25):2394-2405. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2105215. Epub 2021 Jun 3.
4
Assessment of Clinical Benefit of Integrative Genomic Profiling in Advanced Solid Tumors.评估高级实体瘤中综合基因组分析的临床获益。
JAMA Oncol. 2021 Apr 1;7(4):525-533. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2020.7987.
5
Comparison of Universal Genetic Testing vs Guideline-Directed Targeted Testing for Patients With Hereditary Cancer Syndrome.遗传性癌症综合征患者的通用基因检测与指南指导的靶向检测比较。
JAMA Oncol. 2021 Feb 1;7(2):230-237. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2020.6252.
6
Yield and Utility of Germline Testing Following Tumor Sequencing in Patients With Cancer.癌症患者肿瘤测序后种系检测的产量和效用。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Oct 1;3(10):e2019452. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.19452.
7
First-in-Human Trial of the Oral Ataxia Telangiectasia and RAD3-Related (ATR) Inhibitor BAY 1895344 in Patients with Advanced Solid Tumors.首个人体试验:口服共济失调毛细血管扩张症和 RAD3 相关(ATR)抑制剂 BAY 1895344 在晚期实体瘤患者中的应用。
Cancer Discov. 2021 Jan;11(1):80-91. doi: 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-20-0868. Epub 2020 Sep 28.
8
Phase I Trial of First-in-Class ATR Inhibitor M6620 (VX-970) as Monotherapy or in Combination With Carboplatin in Patients With Advanced Solid Tumors.I 期临床试验:新型 ATR 抑制剂 M6620(VX-970)单药或联合卡铂治疗晚期实体瘤。
J Clin Oncol. 2020 Sep 20;38(27):3195-3204. doi: 10.1200/JCO.19.02404. Epub 2020 Jun 22.
9
Molecular profiling for precision cancer therapies.精准肿瘤治疗的分子谱分析。
Genome Med. 2020 Jan 14;12(1):8. doi: 10.1186/s13073-019-0703-1.
10
Integrated genomic profiling expands clinical options for patients with cancer.综合基因组分析为癌症患者提供了更多的临床选择。
Nat Biotechnol. 2019 Nov;37(11):1351-1360. doi: 10.1038/s41587-019-0259-z. Epub 2019 Sep 30.