• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

房颤患者电复律的频率与中风风险的相关性:FinCV-4 研究。

Frequency of cardioversions as an additional risk factor for stroke in atrial fibrillation - the FinCV-4 study.

机构信息

Heart Center, Turku University Hospital and University of Turku, Turku, Finland.

Cardiovascular Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.

出版信息

Ann Med. 2022 Dec;54(1):1452-1458. doi: 10.1080/07853890.2022.2077430.

DOI:10.1080/07853890.2022.2077430
PMID:35594342
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9132398/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) are selected for oral anticoagulation based on individual patient characteristics. There is little information on how clinical AF burden associates with the risk of ischaemic stroke or systemic embolism (SSE). The aim of this study was to explore the association of the frequency of cardioversions (CV) as a measure of clinical AF burden on the long-term SSE risk, with a focus on patients at intermediate stroke risk based on CHADS-VASc score. For these patients, additional SSE risk stratification by assessing CV frequency may aid in the decision on whether to initiate oral anticoagulation.

METHODS

This retrospective analysis of FinCV Study from years 2003-2010 included 2074 patients who were not using any oral anticoagulation (long term or temporary) after CVs and undergoing a total of 6534 CVs for AF from emergency departments of three hospitals. Two study groups were formed: high CV frequency (mean interval between CVs ≤12 months and low frequency (>12 months).

RESULTS

A total of 107 SSEs occurred during a mean follow-up of 5.4 years. The event rates per 100 patient-years were 1.82 and 0.67 in high versus low CV frequency groups, respectively. After adjustment for CHADS-VASc score, CV frequency independently predicted SSE (HR, 2.87 [95% CI, 1.47 to 5.64];  = .002) at 3 years. Competing risk analysis also identified CV frequency (sHR, 2.70 [95% CI, 1.38-5.31];  = .004) as an independent predictor for SSE. In patients with CHADS-VASc score 1 and low CV frequency, the SSE risk was only 0.08 per 100 patient-years.

CONCLUSIONS

Frequency of CVs for symptomatic AF episodes provides additional information on stroke risk in AF patients with CHADS-VASc score 1.Key messagesThis retrospective study offers a unique opportunity to observe the natural course of AF patients with infrequent episodes of clinical arrhythmia when they were not using OAC (before introduction of CHADS-VASc score).Stroke or systemic embolism rate was very low (0.08 per 100 patient-years) in patients with one CHADS-VASc point who visited the emergency room for cardioversion less than once a year.Frequency of cardioversions can be used for additional risk stratification in patients at intermediate risk of stroke based on CHADS-VASc score.

摘要

背景

心房颤动(AF)患者根据个体患者特征选择口服抗凝治疗。关于临床 AF 负担与缺血性卒中和全身性栓塞(SSE)风险之间的关联,信息很少。本研究旨在探讨以心律失常转复(CV)的频率作为临床 AF 负担的衡量标准,与基于 CHADS-VASc 评分的中等卒中风险患者的长期 SSE 风险之间的关联。对于这些患者,通过评估 CV 频率进行额外的 SSE 风险分层可能有助于决定是否开始口服抗凝治疗。

方法

本研究为 2003-2010 年 FinCV 研究的回顾性分析,纳入了 2074 名在 CV 后未使用任何口服抗凝药(长期或临时)且在三家医院急诊科共进行 6534 次 AF 心律失常转复的患者。形成两个研究组:高 CV 频率组(平均 CV 间隔≤12 个月)和低频率组(>12 个月)。

结果

平均随访 5.4 年后共发生 107 例 SSE。高 CV 频率组和低 CV 频率组的每 100 患者年事件发生率分别为 1.82 和 0.67。在调整 CHADS-VASc 评分后,CV 频率独立预测 SSE(HR,2.87[95%CI,1.47-5.64];=0.002),3 年后风险仍然存在。竞争风险分析也确定 CV 频率(sHR,2.70[95%CI,1.38-5.31];=0.004)是 SSE 的独立预测因素。在 CHADS-VASc 评分为 1 分且 CV 频率较低的患者中,SSE 风险仅为每 100 患者年 0.08。

结论

对于有症状的 AF 发作的心律失常转复频率为 CHADS-VASc 评分 1 分的 AF 患者提供了有关卒中风险的额外信息。

关键信息

本回顾性研究提供了一个独特的机会,可以观察到当 CHADS-VASc 评分尚未引入时,临床心律失常发作不频繁的 AF 患者的自然病程。在每年到急诊室进行心律失常转复次数少于一次的 CHADS-VASc 评分 1 分的患者中,卒中或全身性栓塞的发生率非常低(每 100 患者年 0.08)。心律失常转复的频率可以用于基于 CHADS-VASc 评分的中等卒中风险患者的进一步风险分层。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/989b/9132398/c10ea883a665/IANN_A_2077430_F0003_C.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/989b/9132398/d66df5925f18/IANN_A_2077430_F0001_C.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/989b/9132398/2906a4a08e05/IANN_A_2077430_F0002_C.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/989b/9132398/c10ea883a665/IANN_A_2077430_F0003_C.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/989b/9132398/d66df5925f18/IANN_A_2077430_F0001_C.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/989b/9132398/2906a4a08e05/IANN_A_2077430_F0002_C.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/989b/9132398/c10ea883a665/IANN_A_2077430_F0003_C.jpg

相似文献

1
Frequency of cardioversions as an additional risk factor for stroke in atrial fibrillation - the FinCV-4 study.房颤患者电复律的频率与中风风险的相关性:FinCV-4 研究。
Ann Med. 2022 Dec;54(1):1452-1458. doi: 10.1080/07853890.2022.2077430.
2
Anticoagulation for atrial fibrillation patients with the CHA2DS2-VASc score =1 (beyond sex).对于 CHA2DS2-VASc 评分为 1(不分性别)的房颤患者进行抗凝治疗。
Acta Cardiol. 2021 May;76(3):258-264. doi: 10.1080/00015385.2020.1720197. Epub 2020 Feb 14.
3
Ischemic stroke risk estimation in patients without oral anticoagulation: an observational cohort study based on secondary data from Germany.未接受口服抗凝治疗患者的缺血性脑卒中风险评估:基于德国二级数据的观察性队列研究。
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2019 Apr 23;19(1):94. doi: 10.1186/s12872-019-1074-7.
4
Stroke Risk as a Function of Atrial Fibrillation Duration and CHADS-VASc Score.房颤持续时间和 CHADS-VASc 评分与卒中风险的关系。
Circulation. 2019 Nov 12;140(20):1639-1646. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.119.041303. Epub 2019 Sep 30.
5
Relationship of Aging and Incident Comorbidities to Stroke Risk in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation.老龄化和共病事件与房颤患者中风风险的关系。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018 Jan 16;71(2):122-132. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2017.10.085.
6
Comparative Performance of ATRIA, CHADS2, and CHA2DS2-VASc Risk Scores Predicting Stroke in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation: Results From a National Primary Care Database.ATRIA、CHADS2 和 CHA2DS2-VASc 风险评分在预测心房颤动患者中风中的比较表现:来自全国初级保健数据库的结果。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015 Oct 27;66(17):1851-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2015.08.033.
7
Stroke and Systemic Thromboembolism according to CHADS-VASc Score in Contemporary Korean Patients with Atrial Fibrillation.当代韩国心房颤动患者根据 CHADS-VASc 评分的卒中与全身性血栓栓塞
Yonsei Med J. 2022 Apr;63(4):317-324. doi: 10.3349/ymj.2022.63.4.317.
8
Incidence and prediction of ischemic stroke among atrial fibrillation patients with end-stage renal disease requiring dialysis.需要透析的终末期肾病房颤患者缺血性卒中的发病率及预测
Heart Rhythm. 2014 Oct;11(10):1752-9. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2014.06.021. Epub 2014 Jun 18.
9
The value of the CHA2DS2-VASc score for refining stroke risk stratification in patients with atrial fibrillation with a CHADS2 score 0-1: a nationwide cohort study.CHA2DS2-VASc 评分在 CHADS2 评分为 0-1 的房颤患者中对卒中风险分层的价值:一项全国性队列研究。
Thromb Haemost. 2012 Jun;107(6):1172-9. doi: 10.1160/TH12-03-0175. Epub 2012 Apr 3.
10
Oral Anticoagulation and the Risk of Stroke or Death in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation and One Additional Stroke Risk Factor: The Loire Valley Atrial Fibrillation Project.口服抗凝药与伴有 1 项以上卒中危险因素的心房颤动患者卒中或死亡的风险:卢瓦尔河谷心房颤动项目。
Chest. 2016 Apr;149(4):960-8. doi: 10.1378/chest.15-1622. Epub 2016 Jan 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Fibrillatory wave amplitude and thromboembolic risk in non-anticoagulated patients with atrial fibrillation.非抗凝治疗的房颤患者中颤动波幅度与血栓栓塞风险。
Ann Med. 2024 Dec;56(1):2317362. doi: 10.1080/07853890.2024.2317362. Epub 2024 Feb 13.

本文引用的文献

1
Atrial fibrillation pattern, left atrial diameter and risk of cardiovascular events and mortality. A prospective multicenter cohort study.心房颤动模式、左心房直径与心血管事件和死亡率的风险。一项前瞻性多中心队列研究。
Int J Clin Pract. 2021 Mar;75(3):e13771. doi: 10.1111/ijcp.13771. Epub 2020 Nov 9.
2
Early Rhythm-Control Therapy in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation.心房颤动患者的早期节律控制治疗。
N Engl J Med. 2020 Oct 1;383(14):1305-1316. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2019422. Epub 2020 Aug 29.
3
Stroke Risk as a Function of Atrial Fibrillation Duration and CHADS-VASc Score.
房颤持续时间和 CHADS-VASc 评分与卒中风险的关系。
Circulation. 2019 Nov 12;140(20):1639-1646. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.119.041303. Epub 2019 Sep 30.
4
Oral anticoagulation in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation and a CHA2DS2-VASc score of 1: a current opinion of the European Society of Cardiology Working Group on Cardiovascular Pharmacotherapy and European Society of Cardiology Council on Stroke.非瓣膜性心房颤动且 CHA2DS2-VASc 评分为 1 分的患者的口服抗凝治疗:欧洲心脏病学会心血管药物治疗工作组和欧洲心脏病学会卒中委员会的当前观点。
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Pharmacother. 2019 Jul 1;5(3):171-180. doi: 10.1093/ehjcvp/pvz016.
5
The REDCap consortium: Building an international community of software platform partners.REDCap 联盟:构建软件平台合作伙伴的国际社区。
J Biomed Inform. 2019 Jul;95:103208. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2019.103208. Epub 2019 May 9.
6
2019 AHA/ACC/HRS Focused Update of the 2014 AHA/ACC/HRS Guideline for the Management of Patients With Atrial Fibrillation: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines and the Heart Rhythm Society in Collaboration With the Society of Thoracic Surgeons.2019年美国心脏协会/美国心脏病学会/心律学会对2014年美国心脏协会/美国心脏病学会/心律学会心房颤动患者管理指南的聚焦更新:美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会临床实践指南工作组和心律学会与胸外科医师协会合作报告
Circulation. 2019 Jul 9;140(2):e125-e151. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000665. Epub 2019 Jan 28.
7
Atrial fibrillation burden, progression, and the risk of death: a case-crossover analysis in patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices.心房颤动负担、进展与死亡风险:心脏植入式电子设备患者的病例交叉分析。
Europace. 2019 Mar 1;21(3):404-413. doi: 10.1093/europace/euy222.
8
Association of Burden of Atrial Fibrillation With Risk of Ischemic Stroke in Adults With Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation: The KP-RHYTHM Study.阵发性心房颤动患者的房颤负担与缺血性卒中风险的关联:KP-RHYTHM 研究。
JAMA Cardiol. 2018 Jul 1;3(7):601-608. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2018.1176.
9
Catheter Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation with Heart Failure.心力衰竭合并心房颤动的导管消融治疗。
N Engl J Med. 2018 Feb 1;378(5):417-427. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1707855.
10
Duration of device-detected subclinical atrial fibrillation and occurrence of stroke in ASSERT.ASSERT 中设备检测到的无症状性心房颤动持续时间与卒中发生情况。
Eur Heart J. 2017 May 1;38(17):1339-1344. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehx042.