• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

提高专业化新生儿和儿科危重症转运团队的出动时间。

Improving Mobilization Times of a Specialized Neonatal and Pediatric Critical Care Transport Team.

机构信息

Department of Pediatric Critical Care, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI; Children's Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI.

Children's Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI.

出版信息

Air Med J. 2022 May-Jun;41(3):315-319. doi: 10.1016/j.amj.2022.01.001. Epub 2022 Feb 11.

DOI:10.1016/j.amj.2022.01.001
PMID:35595341
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The Ground and Air Medical Quality Transport database identifies the average mobilization time (AMT) of the transport team as a metric for benchmarking. Our specific aim was to decrease our AMT to < 25 minutes for our expanded role, ground, nonsimultaneous transports by the end of quarter 4 of 2018.

METHODS

Standardization of data collection with awareness building, ambulance vendor involvement, and team-focused interventions were the different phases of project implementation. Documentation of reasons for delay was performed pre- and postimplementation.

RESULTS

Our AMT decreased from a baseline of 30.3 minutes to 24.5 minutes after project implementation. Communication delays (19.0%), reason for delay not documented (16.5%), no team available (14.0%), rotor wing vendor delays (12.4%), and ambulance vendor delays (7.4%) were the common reasons for delay on our preimplementation Pareto analysis. Communication and pharmacy delays were the most common reasons during all 3 phases of our project.

CONCLUSIONS

Implementation of the project allowed us to achieve our goal of improving our AMT. Understanding the reasons for delay is a crucial consideration, and success depends on careful change management. Further iterations will need to focus on improving communication and the pharmacy medication dispatch process.

摘要

目的

地面和空中医疗质量转运数据库将转运团队的平均出动时间(AMT)作为基准测试的指标。我们的具体目标是在 2018 年第 4 季度末,将我们扩展后的地面非同时转运的 AMT 降低到<25 分钟。

方法

通过数据收集的标准化、救护车供应商的参与以及以团队为中心的干预措施,实现项目实施的不同阶段。在实施前后对延迟原因进行记录。

结果

我们的 AMT 从基线的 30.3 分钟降低到项目实施后的 24.5 分钟。沟通延迟(19.0%)、延迟原因未记录(16.5%)、无团队可用(14.0%)、旋翼供应商延迟(12.4%)和救护车供应商延迟(7.4%)是我们在实施前的帕累托分析中延迟的常见原因。在项目的所有 3 个阶段中,沟通和药房延迟都是最常见的原因。

结论

项目的实施使我们能够实现改善 AMT 的目标。了解延迟的原因是一个关键的考虑因素,成功取决于仔细的变更管理。进一步的迭代将需要专注于改进沟通和药房药物派遣流程。

相似文献

1
Improving Mobilization Times of a Specialized Neonatal and Pediatric Critical Care Transport Team.提高专业化新生儿和儿科危重症转运团队的出动时间。
Air Med J. 2022 May-Jun;41(3):315-319. doi: 10.1016/j.amj.2022.01.001. Epub 2022 Feb 11.
2
Is air transport faster? A comparison of air versus ground transport times for interfacility transfers in a regional referral system.航空运输更快吗?区域转诊系统中机构间转运的航空与地面运输时间比较。
Air Med J. 2006 Jul-Aug;25(4):170-2. doi: 10.1016/j.amj.2006.04.003.
3
Pediatric critical care transport--the safety of the journey: a five-year review of vehicular collisions involving pediatric and neonatal transport teams.儿科重症监护转运——旅程的安全性:对涉及儿科和新生儿转运团队的车辆碰撞事故的五年回顾
Prehosp Emerg Care. 2002 Oct-Dec;6(4):449-54. doi: 10.1080/10903120290938111.
4
Air ambulance transport times and advanced cardiac life support interventions during the interfacility transfer of patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.空中救护车转运时间与急性 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者院间转运中实施的高级心脏生命支持干预。
Prehosp Emerg Care. 2010 Jul-Sep;14(3):292-9. doi: 10.3109/10903121003760192.
5
Causes of Delay During Interfacility Transports of Injured Patients Transported by Air Ambulance.空中救护转运受伤患者时机构间转运延误的原因。
Prehosp Emerg Care. 2020 Sep-Oct;24(5):625-633. doi: 10.1080/10903127.2019.1683662. Epub 2019 Nov 11.
6
Critical Care Transport Time Differences Between Ground, Helicopter VFR, and Helicopter IFR Transports.地面、直升机目视飞行规则(VFR)和直升机仪表飞行规则(IFR)转运之间的重症监护运输时间差异
Aerosp Med Hum Perform. 2020 Feb 1;91(2):98-101. doi: 10.3357/AMHP.5468.2020.
7
[Air ambulance service from Akureyri, Iceland 2012-2020].[2012年至2020年冰岛阿库雷里的空中救护服务]
Laeknabladid. 2022 Mar;108(3):137-142. doi: 10.17992/lbl.2022.03.682.
8
Out-of-Hospital Intubation Success Rates Vary Based on Transport Environment.院外插管成功率因转运环境而异。
J Emerg Med. 2022 Feb;62(2):171-174. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2021.10.031. Epub 2022 Jan 16.
9
Predictors of Prehospital On-Scene Time in an Australian Emergency Retrieval Service.澳大利亚紧急救援服务中现场前救治时间的预测因素。
Prehosp Disaster Med. 2019 Jun;34(3):317-321. doi: 10.1017/S1049023X19004394.
10
Regional intensive care transports: a prospective analysis of distance, time and cost for road, helicopter and fixed-wing ambulances.区域重症监护转运:对公路、直升机和固定翼救护车的距离、时间和成本的前瞻性分析。
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2014 Jun 5;22:36. doi: 10.1186/1757-7241-22-36.

引用本文的文献

1
A quality improvement initiative to improve transport team mobilization for emergent neonatal transfers.一项旨在改善新生儿紧急转运时转运团队调度的质量改进举措。
Front Pediatr. 2025 Jul 23;13:1623047. doi: 10.3389/fped.2025.1623047. eCollection 2025.
2
Quicker team launch times for urgent priority neonatal retrievals: A Quality Improvement Initiative study.缩短紧急优先新生儿转运的团队启动时间:一项质量改进倡议研究。
J Perinatol. 2025 Jul 23. doi: 10.1038/s41372-025-02354-6.