• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

迈向以患者为中心的医疗照护和共同决策的德国模式。

Moving towards patient-centered care and shared decision-making in Germany.

机构信息

University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Department of Medical Psychology, Hamburg, Germany; University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Center for Healthcare Research, Hamburg, Germany.

Heidelberg University Hospital, Department of General Internal Medicine and Psychosomatics, Heidelberg, Germany.

出版信息

Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2022 Jun;171:49-57. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2022.04.001. Epub 2022 May 18.

DOI:10.1016/j.zefq.2022.04.001
PMID:35595668
Abstract

The main focus of this paper is to describe the development and current state of policy, research and implementation of patient-centered care (PCC) and shared decision-making (SDM) in Germany. What is the current state in health policy? Since 2013, the Law on Patients' Rights has standardized all rights and responsibilities regarding medical care for patients in Germany. This comprises the right to informed decisions, comprehensive and comprehensible information, and decisions based on a clinician-patient partnership. In addition, reports and action plans such as the German Ethics Council's report on patient well-being, the National Health Literacy Action Plan, or the National Cancer Plan emphasize and foster PCC and SDM on a policy level. There are a number of public organizations in Germany that support PCC and SDM. How are patients and the public involved in health policy and research? Publishers and funding agencies increasingly demand patient and public involvement. Numerous initiatives and organizations are involved in publicizing ways to engage patients and the public. Also, an increasing number of public and research institutions have established patient advisory boards. How is PCC and SDM taught? Great progress has been made in introducing SDM into the curricula of medical schools and other health care providers' (HCPs) schools (e.g., nursing, physical therapy). What is the German research agenda? The German government and other public institutions have constantly funded research programs in which PCC and SDM are important topics. This yielded several large-scale funding initiatives and helped to develop SDM training programs for HCPs in different fields of health care and information materials. Recently, two implementation studies on SDM have been conducted. What is the current uptake of PCC and SDM in routine care, and what implementation efforts are underway? Compared to the last country report from 2017, PCC and SDM efforts in policy, research and education have been intensified. However, many steps are still needed to reliably implement SDM in routine care in Germany. Specifically, the further development and uptake of decision tools and countrywide SDM trainings for HCPs require further efforts. Nevertheless, an increasing number of decision support tools - primarily with support from health insurance funds and other public agencies - are to be implemented in routine care. Also, recent implementation efforts are promising. For example, reimbursement by health insurance companies of hospital-wide SDM implementation is being piloted. A necessary next step is to nationally coordinate the gathering and provision of the many PCC and SDM resources available.

摘要

本文的主要重点是描述德国以患者为中心的护理(PCC)和共享决策(SDM)的政策、研究和实施的发展和现状。 健康政策的现状如何? 自 2013 年以来,《患者权利法》规范了德国医疗保健中所有与患者相关的权利和责任。 这包括知情决策、全面和易懂的信息以及基于医患伙伴关系的决策的权利。 此外,报告和行动计划,如德国伦理委员会关于患者福祉的报告、国家健康素养行动计划或国家癌症计划,在政策层面强调并促进 PCC 和 SDM。 德国有许多公共组织支持 PCC 和 SDM。 患者和公众如何参与卫生政策和研究? 出版商和资助机构越来越要求患者和公众的参与。 许多倡议和组织都参与宣传让患者和公众参与的方式。 此外,越来越多的公共和研究机构已经成立了患者咨询委员会。 如何教授 PCC 和 SDM? 将 SDM 引入医学院和其他卫生保健提供者(HCP)学校(例如护理、物理治疗)的课程方面已经取得了很大进展。 德国的研究议程是什么? 德国政府和其他公共机构不断为研究计划提供资金,其中 PCC 和 SDM 是重要的主题。 这促成了几个大规模的资助计划,并帮助为不同领域的 HCP 开发了 SDM 培训计划和信息材料。 最近,进行了两项关于 SDM 的实施研究。 在常规护理中,目前 PCC 和 SDM 的采用情况如何,正在进行哪些实施工作? 与 2017 年的上一份国家报告相比,政策、研究和教育方面的 PCC 和 SDM 工作已经得到加强。 然而,要在德国常规护理中可靠地实施 SDM,还需要采取许多步骤。 具体来说,需要进一步发展和采用决策工具以及针对 HCP 的全国范围的 SDM 培训。 尽管如此,越来越多的决策支持工具 - 主要是在健康保险公司和其他公共机构的支持下 - 将在常规护理中实施。 最近的实施工作也很有希望。 例如,保险公司正在试点报销医院范围内的 SDM 实施。 下一步必要的是在全国范围内协调收集和提供可用的许多 PCC 和 SDM 资源。

相似文献

1
Moving towards patient-centered care and shared decision-making in Germany.迈向以患者为中心的医疗照护和共同决策的德国模式。
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2022 Jun;171:49-57. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2022.04.001. Epub 2022 May 18.
2
The long way of implementing patient-centered care and shared decision making in Germany.在德国实施以患者为中心的护理和共同决策的漫长道路。
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2017 Jun;123-124:46-51. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2017.05.006. Epub 2017 May 22.
3
Implementation of shared decision-making and patient-centered care in France: Towards a wider uptake in 2022.法国实施共享决策和以患者为中心的医疗照护:2022 年进一步推广。
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2022 Jun;171:42-48. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2022.03.001. Epub 2022 May 21.
4
Patient participation and shared decision making in Germany - history, agents and current transfer to practice.德国的患者参与和共同决策——历史、推动者及当前向实践的转化
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2011;105(4):263-70. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2011.04.002. Epub 2011 May 4.
5
Time to rise to the challenge of truly implementing patient-centered care and shared decision-making in Israel: The educational and policy mission.迎接挑战,真正在以色列实现以患者为中心的医疗和共同决策:教育和政策使命。
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2022 Jun;171:68-73. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2022.04.013. Epub 2022 May 21.
6
Shared decision-making in Canada: Update on integration of evidence in health decisions and patient-centred care government mandates.加拿大的共同决策:健康决策中证据整合和以患者为中心的政府指令更新
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2022 Jun;171:22-29. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2022.04.006. Epub 2022 May 21.
7
Implementation of patient-centred care in Denmark: The way forward with shared decision-making.丹麦实施以患者为中心的护理:通过共同决策推进
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2022 Jun;171:36-41. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2022.04.005. Epub 2022 May 21.
8
Moving shared decision-making forward in Iran.推动伊朗的共享决策。
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2022 Jun;171:62-67. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2022.05.001. Epub 2022 May 21.
9
An overview on the promotion on patient-centered care and shared decision-making in Mexico.墨西哥促进以患者为中心的医疗照护和共同决策概述。
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2022 Jun;171:93-97. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2022.05.002. Epub 2022 May 21.
10
Shared decision-making and person-centred care approaches in three African regions.三个非洲地区的共同决策和以患者为中心的护理方法。
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2022 Jun;171:6-10. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2022.04.023. Epub 2022 May 21.

引用本文的文献

1
[Shared decision making-strengthening patient-physiciant relations through joint deliberation].[共同决策——通过联合审议加强医患关系]
Urologie. 2025 Jul 21. doi: 10.1007/s00120-025-02638-x.
2
From Burden to Empowerment. Patient-Reported Influencing Factors on Participation in Shared Decision Making in Oncology, a Meta-Study.从负担到赋权:患者报告的肿瘤学共同决策参与影响因素的元研究
Psychooncology. 2025 Jul;34(7):e70218. doi: 10.1002/pon.70218.
3
Medical students' attitudes toward providing patients with audio recordings of their medical encounters: a cross-sectional online survey.
医学生对为患者提供医疗问诊录音的态度:一项横断面在线调查。
BMC Med Educ. 2025 Jun 19;25(1):853. doi: 10.1186/s12909-025-07460-9.
4
Navigating Power Imbalances and Stigma in Mental Healthcare. Patient-Reported Barriers and Facilitators to Participation in Shared Decision-Making in Mental Health Care, a Qualitative Meta-Summary.应对精神卫生保健中的权力失衡和污名化。患者报告的参与精神卫生保健共同决策的障碍和促进因素,一项定性元综述。
Health Expect. 2025 Apr;28(2):e70239. doi: 10.1111/hex.70239.
5
Factors Influencing Patient-Centered Care and Shared Decision-Making in Primary Care Settings in Saudi Arabia: A Scoping Review.影响沙特阿拉伯基层医疗环境中以患者为中心的护理和共同决策的因素:一项范围综述
Cureus. 2024 Dec 21;16(12):e76142. doi: 10.7759/cureus.76142. eCollection 2024 Dec.
6
[Dimensions of person-centeredness in abortion services-selected results of the CarePreg study].[堕胎服务中以患者为中心的维度——CarePreg研究的选定结果]
Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2025 Jan;68(1):19-27. doi: 10.1007/s00103-024-03990-7. Epub 2024 Dec 10.
7
The Heidelberg Decision Aid for Patients With Lung Cancer (HELP)—Findings of a Randomized Controlled Trial.海德堡肺癌患者决策辅助工具(HELP)——一项随机对照试验的结果
Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2024 Dec 27;121(26):861-867. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.m2024.0228.
8
Patient Orientation and Shared Decision- Making-Implementing Patients' Rights in Routine Clinical Practice.患者导向与共同决策——在常规临床实践中落实患者权利
Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2024 Jun 14;121(12):383-384. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.m2024.0112.
9
Evaluation of Community Involvement and Development in an Orthopedic Hospital.一家骨科医院的社区参与和发展评估
Healthcare (Basel). 2024 Jun 27;12(13):1286. doi: 10.3390/healthcare12131286.
10
Assessment of relevance and actual implementation of person-centeredness in healthcare and social support services for women with unintended pregnancy in Germany (CarePreg): results of expert workshops.评估德国意外怀孕女性的医疗保健和社会支持服务中以人为中心的相关性和实际实施情况(CarePreg):专家研讨会的结果。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2024 Apr 6;24(1):247. doi: 10.1186/s12884-024-06453-8.