• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

加拿大的共同决策:健康决策中证据整合和以患者为中心的政府指令更新

Shared decision-making in Canada: Update on integration of evidence in health decisions and patient-centred care government mandates.

机构信息

VITAM - Centre de recherche en santé durable, Centre intégré universitaire de santé et services sociaux (CIUSSS) de la Capitale-Nationale, Quebec City, Canada; Department of Family Medicine and Emergency Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Université Laval, Pavillon Ferdinand-Vandry, Quebec City, Canada; Research Centre of the Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Québec, Quebec City, Canada.

Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada; Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Canada.

出版信息

Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2022 Jun;171:22-29. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2022.04.006. Epub 2022 May 21.

DOI:10.1016/j.zefq.2022.04.006
PMID:35606312
Abstract

In Canada, government mandates for patient-centred care (PCC) vary across the 10 provinces and three territories. Although basic medical and hospital services are provided for all, health care options for patients also depend on having private insurance. Thus, the current design of the Canadian healthcare system has several implications for PCC and shared decision-making (SDM). Since 2007, this is our fourth update on SDM in Canada. The aim of this paper is to provide an update on the current state of SDM and patient and public involvement in Canada. Overall, we still observed the difficulty of implementing any sort of national strategy partly because of the decentralized nature of the healthcare system. Second, national professional education programs are complicated by licensure and scope of practice variations across jurisdictions. Third, there are variations in the availability of different options covered by universal healthcare. Canada has experienced some favorable development as PCC is now explicitly articulated in the policies of most provinces and territories and there are increased efforts to give patients more access to their electronic health records. However, patient and public engagement (PPE) reform in health programs and governance remains an exception, and continuing centralization of governance structures may reduce their responsiveness to patient priorities. In a 2018 survey, 47.2% of respondents reported that they were not told by their health professional that they had a choice about treatment. Nonetheless, decision aids and decision coaching are increasingly available for health-related decisions and the Ottawa Hospital Research Institute's decision aid inventory has ensured continued leadership in this area. Diverse jurisdictions are starting to embed decision aids into care pathways, with some decision aids being included in clinical practice guidelines. The COVID-19 pandemic may have had a negative impact on SDM by removing decision choices due to emergency public health mandates, but stimulated new research and decision aids. Canada continues to assign health research funding to SDM and PCC, and a program dedicated to patient-oriented research is central to this effort. Guides and frameworks are increasingly available for planning and evaluating PPE. Finally, various initiatives are attempting to involve and empower Indigenous peoples through PPE and SDM.

摘要

在加拿大,10 个省和 3 个地区对以患者为中心的护理(PCC)的政府要求各不相同。尽管为所有人提供了基本的医疗和医院服务,但患者的医疗保健选择也取决于是否拥有私人保险。因此,加拿大现行的医疗保健系统设计对 PCC 和共享决策(SDM)有几个影响。自 2007 年以来,这是我们第四次更新加拿大的 SDM 信息。本文的目的是提供加拿大 SDM 和患者及公众参与现状的最新情况。总体而言,我们仍然观察到实施任何国家战略的困难,部分原因是医疗保健系统的分散性质。其次,国家专业教育计划因管辖范围内的许可和实践范围的差异而变得复杂。第三,全民医疗保健涵盖的不同选择的可用性也存在差异。加拿大在 PCC 方面经历了一些有利的发展,因为现在大多数省份和地区的政策都明确阐述了 PCC,并且为患者提供更多访问其电子健康记录的机会。然而,在卫生计划和治理方面,患者和公众参与(PPE)改革仍然是一个例外,治理结构的持续集中化可能会降低他们对患者优先事项的响应能力。在 2018 年的一项调查中,47.2%的受访者表示,他们的医疗专业人员没有告诉他们在治疗方面有选择。尽管如此,决策辅助工具和决策辅导越来越多地用于与健康相关的决策,渥太华医院研究所在决策辅助工具清单方面确保了在这一领域的持续领导力。不同的司法管辖区开始将决策辅助工具嵌入护理路径中,一些决策辅助工具被纳入临床实践指南。COVID-19 大流行可能通过紧急公共卫生命令取消决策选择对 SDM 产生了负面影响,但激发了新的研究和决策辅助工具。加拿大继续将健康研究资金分配给 SDM 和 PCC,一个专门针对以患者为中心的研究的项目是这一努力的核心。用于规划和评估 PPE 的指南和框架越来越多。最后,各种倡议正在试图通过 PPE 和 SDM 让原住民参与并赋予他们权力。

相似文献

1
Shared decision-making in Canada: Update on integration of evidence in health decisions and patient-centred care government mandates.加拿大的共同决策:健康决策中证据整合和以患者为中心的政府指令更新
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2022 Jun;171:22-29. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2022.04.006. Epub 2022 May 21.
2
Moving towards patient-centered care and shared decision-making in Germany.迈向以患者为中心的医疗照护和共同决策的德国模式。
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2022 Jun;171:49-57. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2022.04.001. Epub 2022 May 18.
3
Milestones, barriers and beacons: Shared decision making in Canada inches ahead.里程碑、障碍与指引:加拿大的共同决策正逐步推进。
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2017 Jun;123-124:23-27. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2017.05.020. Epub 2017 May 20.
4
Shared decision-making in Malaysia: Legislation, patient involvement, implementation and the impact of COVID-19.马来西亚的共享决策:立法、患者参与、实施情况以及 COVID-19 的影响。
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2022 Jun;171:89-92. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2022.04.020. Epub 2022 May 21.
5
The long way of implementing patient-centered care and shared decision making in Germany.在德国实施以患者为中心的护理和共同决策的漫长道路。
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2017 Jun;123-124:46-51. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2017.05.006. Epub 2017 May 22.
6
Advancing towards the implementation of patient-centred care in Chile: An opportunity to effectively practice shared decision-making.迈向智利实施以患者为中心的医疗照护:有效施行共同决策的契机。
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2022 Jun;171:30-35. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2022.04.022. Epub 2022 May 25.
7
Implementation of shared decision-making and patient-centered care in France: Towards a wider uptake in 2022.法国实施共享决策和以患者为中心的医疗照护:2022 年进一步推广。
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2022 Jun;171:42-48. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2022.03.001. Epub 2022 May 21.
8
Shared decision-making in Spain in 2022: An updated revision of the current situation.2022 年西班牙的共同决策:当前形势的最新综述。
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2022 Jun;171:122-128. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2022.04.018. Epub 2022 May 25.
9
Shared decision-making and person-centred care approaches in three African regions.三个非洲地区的共同决策和以患者为中心的护理方法。
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2022 Jun;171:6-10. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2022.04.023. Epub 2022 May 21.
10
Shared decision-making and patient and public involvement: Can they become standard in Switzerland?共同决策和患者及公众参与:在瑞士它们能成为标准吗?
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2022 Jun;171:135-138. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2022.04.019. Epub 2022 May 21.

引用本文的文献

1
The Heart Health Yarning Tool: Co-Designing a Shared Decision-Making Tool With Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander People for Cardiovascular Disease Prevention and Risk Management.心脏健康预警工具:与原住民和托雷斯海峡岛民共同设计一个用于心血管疾病预防和风险管理的共享决策工具。
Health Expect. 2025 Aug;28(4):e70387. doi: 10.1111/hex.70387.
2
Examining How Technology Supports Shared Decision-Making in Oncology Consultations: Qualitative Thematic Analysis.审视技术如何支持肿瘤学会诊中的共同决策:定性主题分析
JMIR Cancer. 2025 Jun 11;11:e70827. doi: 10.2196/70827.
3
Measuring healthcare professionals' perceptions of their ability to adopt shared decision making: Translation and psychometric evaluation of the Danish version of the IcanSDM questionnaire.
测量医疗保健专业人员对采用共享决策能力的看法:丹麦版 IcanSDM 问卷的翻译及心理计量学评估。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2024 Nov 15;24(1):340. doi: 10.1186/s12911-024-02747-1.
4
Evaluation of Community Involvement and Development in an Orthopedic Hospital.一家骨科医院的社区参与和发展评估
Healthcare (Basel). 2024 Jun 27;12(13):1286. doi: 10.3390/healthcare12131286.
5
Barriers and Stimulus in Shared Decision Making Among Aesthetic Dermatologists in China: Findings from a Cross-Sectional Study.中国美容皮肤科医生共同决策中的障碍与激励因素:一项横断面研究的结果
Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol. 2024 May 20;17:1153-1164. doi: 10.2147/CCID.S457802. eCollection 2024.
6
Engagement of Older Adults Receiving Home Care Services and Their Caregivers in Health Decisions in Partnership With Clinical Teams: Protocol for a Multimethod Study to Prioritize and Culturally Adapt Decision Aids for Home Care.让接受居家护理服务的老年人及其照顾者与临床团队合作参与健康决策:一项多方法研究的方案,旨在为居家护理确定决策辅助工具的优先级并进行文化适应性调整。
JMIR Res Protoc. 2023 Nov 20;12:e53150. doi: 10.2196/53150.
7
Prevalence and predictors of shared decision-making in goals-of-care clinician-family meetings for critically ill neurologic patients: a multi-center mixed-methods study.重症神经疾病患者的临床医生-家庭治疗目标会议中共享决策的流行率及其预测因素:一项多中心混合方法研究。
Crit Care. 2023 Oct 21;27(1):403. doi: 10.1186/s13054-023-04693-2.
8
"The Terminology Might Be Ahead of Practice": Embedding Shared Decision Making in Practice-Barriers and Facilitators to Implementation of SDM in the Context of Maternity Care.“术语可能领先于实践”:在产科护理背景下将共同决策融入实践——共同决策实施的障碍与促进因素
MDM Policy Pract. 2023 Sep 22;8(2):23814683231199943. doi: 10.1177/23814683231199943. eCollection 2023 Jul-Dec.