• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

SYNTAX 试验中分叉病变患者 10 年的预测死亡率和观察死亡率。

Predicted and Observed Mortality at 10 Years in Patients With Bifurcation Lesions in the SYNTAX Trial.

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, National University of Ireland, Galway, Galway, Ireland.

Department of Cardiology, National University of Ireland, Galway, Galway, Ireland; National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.

出版信息

JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2022 Jun 27;15(12):1231-1242. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2022.04.025. Epub 2022 May 17.

DOI:10.1016/j.jcin.2022.04.025
PMID:35595676
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of bifurcation lesions is associated with higher rates of adverse events, and currently it is unclear whether PCI or coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) is the safer treatment for these patients at very long-term follow-up.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of bifurcation lesions on individual predicted and observed all-cause 10-year mortality in the SYNTAX (Synergy Between PCI With Taxus and Cardiac Surgery) trial.

METHODS

In the SYNTAXES (SYNTAX Extended Survival) study, 10-year observed and individual predicted mortality derived from the SYNTAX score 2020 (SS-2020) was compared between patients with ≥1 bifurcation (n = 1,300) and those with no bifurcations (n = 487).

RESULTS

Among patients treated with PCI, patients with >1 bifurcation lesion compared with those without bifurcation lesions had a significantly higher risk for all-cause death (19.8% vs 30.1%; HR: 1.55; 95% CI: 1.12-2.14; P = 0.007), whereas following CABG, mortality was similar in patients with and those without bifurcation lesions (23.3% vs 23.0%; HR: 0.81; 95% CI: 0.59-1.12; P = 0.207; P = 0.006). In PCI patients, a 2-stent vs a 1-stent technique was associated with higher mortality (33.3% vs 25.9%; HR: 1.51; 95% CI: 1.06-2.14; P = 0.021). According to the SS-2020, among those with ≥1 bifurcation, there was equipoise for all-cause mortality between PCI and CABG in 2 quartiles of the population, whereas CABG was superior to PCI in the 2 remaining quartiles.

CONCLUSIONS

Bifurcation lesions require special attention from the heart team, considering the higher 10-year all-cause mortality associated with PCI. Careful evaluation of bifurcation lesion complexity and calculation of individualized 10-year prognosis using the SS-2020 may therefore be helpful in decision making. (Synergy Between PCI With TAXUS and Cardiac Surgery: SYNTAX Extended Survival [SYNTAXES], NCT03417050; Taxus Drug-Eluting Stent Versus Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery for the Treatment of Narrowed Arteries [SYNTAX], NCT00114972).

摘要

背景

经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)分叉病变与更高的不良事件发生率相关,目前尚不清楚对于这些患者在非常长期随访时,PCI 或冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)是更安全的治疗方法。

目的

本研究旨在探讨分叉病变对 SYNTAX 试验中个体预测和观察到的 10 年全因死亡率的影响。

方法

在 SYNTAXES(SYNTAX 延长生存)研究中,比较了有≥1 个分叉(n=1300)和无分叉(n=487)患者的 SYNTAX 评分 2020(SS-2020)预测的 10 年观察到和个体预测的死亡率。

结果

在接受 PCI 治疗的患者中,与无分叉病变患者相比,有>1 个分叉病变患者的全因死亡风险显著更高(19.8%比 30.1%;HR:1.55;95%CI:1.12-2.14;P=0.007),而接受 CABG 后,有分叉病变和无分叉病变患者的死亡率相似(23.3%比 23.0%;HR:0.81;95%CI:0.59-1.12;P=0.207;P=0.006)。在 PCI 患者中,2 支架技术与 1 支架技术相比死亡率更高(33.3%比 25.9%;HR:1.51;95%CI:1.06-2.14;P=0.021)。根据 SS-2020,在有≥1 个分叉的患者中,在人群的 2 个四分位数中,PCI 和 CABG 的全因死亡率存在平衡,而在其余 2 个四分位数中,CABG 优于 PCI。

结论

分叉病变需要心脏团队特别关注,因为与 PCI 相关的 10 年全因死亡率更高。因此,仔细评估分叉病变的复杂性并使用 SS-2020 计算个体化 10 年预后可能有助于决策。(紫杉醇药物洗脱支架与心脏手术的协同作用:SYNTAX 延长生存[SYNTAXES],NCT03417050;Taxus 药物洗脱支架与冠状动脉旁路移植术治疗狭窄动脉[SYNTAX],NCT00114972)。

相似文献

1
Predicted and Observed Mortality at 10 Years in Patients With Bifurcation Lesions in the SYNTAX Trial.SYNTAX 试验中分叉病变患者 10 年的预测死亡率和观察死亡率。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2022 Jun 27;15(12):1231-1242. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2022.04.025. Epub 2022 May 17.
2
10-Year All-Cause Mortality Following Percutaneous or Surgical Revascularization in Patients With Heavy Calcification.重度钙化患者行经皮或手术血运重建后 10 年全因死亡率。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2022 Jan 24;15(2):193-204. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2021.10.026. Epub 2021 Dec 29.
3
Can Machine Learning Aid the Selection of Percutaneous vs Surgical Revascularization?机器学习能否辅助经皮与手术血运重建的选择?
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2023 Nov 28;82(22):2113-2124. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2023.09.818.
4
Percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with three-vessel or left main coronary artery disease: 10-year follow-up of the multicentre randomised controlled SYNTAX trial.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与冠状动脉旁路移植术治疗三血管病变或左主干病变患者:多中心随机对照 SYNTAX 试验 10 年随访结果。
Lancet. 2019 Oct 12;394(10206):1325-1334. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)31997-X. Epub 2019 Sep 2.
5
Impact of Peri-Procedural Myocardial Infarction on Outcomes After Revascularization.围术期心肌梗死对血运重建后结局的影响。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020 Oct 6;76(14):1622-1639. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2020.08.009.
6
Mortality 10 Years After Percutaneous or Surgical Revascularization in Patients With Total Coronary Artery Occlusions.完全性冠状动脉闭塞患者经皮或手术血运重建 10 年后的死亡率。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2021 Feb 9;77(5):529-540. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2020.11.055.
7
Sex Differences in All-Cause Mortality in the Decade Following Complex Coronary Revascularization.复杂冠状动脉血运重建后十年全因死亡率的性别差异。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020 Aug 25;76(8):889-899. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2020.06.066.
8
10-Year Follow-Up After Revascularization in Elderly Patients With Complex Coronary Artery Disease.老年复杂冠状动脉疾病患者血运重建后的 10 年随访。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2021 Jun 8;77(22):2761-2773. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2021.04.016.
9
Mortality after multivessel revascularisation involving the proximal left anterior descending artery.左前降支近端多支血管血运重建术后的死亡率。
Heart. 2022 Oct 28;108(22):1784-1791. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2022-320934.
10
Left Main Coronary Artery Disease Revascularization According to the SYNTAX Score.左主干冠状动脉疾病血运重建术根据 SYNTAX 评分。
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 Sep;12(9):e008007. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.118.008007. Epub 2019 Sep 9.

引用本文的文献

1
Double-Kissing Crush Versus Provisional Stenting for Coronary Bifurcations: A 1-Year Follow-up Study in Vietnam.冠状动脉分叉病变的双吻挤压术与临时支架置入术对比:越南的一项1年随访研究
J Soc Cardiovasc Angiogr Interv. 2025 Jan 15;4(3Part A):102500. doi: 10.1016/j.jscai.2024.102500. eCollection 2025 Mar.
2
Impact of Bifurcation Lesions on Outcomes After FFR-Guided PCI or CABG.分叉病变对血流储备分数指导下的经皮冠状动脉介入治疗或冠状动脉旁路移植术后结局的影响。
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2025 Jan;18(1):e014610. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.124.014610. Epub 2024 Dec 27.
3
DES Selection for Left Main and Coronary Bifurcation Stenting.
左主干和冠状动脉分叉处支架置入术的药物洗脱支架选择
Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2023 Sep 21;24(9):266. doi: 10.31083/j.rcm2409266. eCollection 2023 Sep.
4
Impact of Prolonged Dual Antiplatelet Therapy After Bifurcation Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients with High Ischemic Risk.高缺血风险患者经皮冠状动脉介入治疗分叉病变后延长双联抗血小板治疗的影响。
Am J Cardiovasc Drugs. 2024 Jul;24(4):577-588. doi: 10.1007/s40256-024-00657-1. Epub 2024 Jun 13.
5
State-of-art review: intravascular imaging in percutaneous coronary interventions.最新综述:经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中的血管内成像
Cardiol Plus. 2023 Oct-Dec;8(4):227-246. doi: 10.1097/CP9.0000000000000069. Epub 2024 Jan 4.
6
Stepwise provisional versus systematic culotte for stenting of true coronary bifurcation lesions: five-year follow-up of the multicentre randomised EBC TWO Trial.真性冠状动脉分叉病变支架置入的逐步临时支架术与系统性裤裙支架术对比:多中心随机EBC TWO试验的五年随访
EuroIntervention. 2023 May 16;19(4):e297-304. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-23-00211.
7
High triglyceride-glucose index predicts cardiovascular events in patients with coronary bifurcation lesions: a large-scale cohort study.高甘油三酯-葡萄糖指数预测冠状动脉分叉病变患者的心血管事件:一项大规模队列研究。
Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2023 Oct 27;22(1):289. doi: 10.1186/s12933-023-02016-x.
8
Late stent thrombosis as a complication of T and small protrusion bifurcation stenting: a case report.晚期支架内血栓形成作为T型和小突出分叉病变支架置入术的并发症:一例报告
Eur Heart J Case Rep. 2023 May 31;7(6):ytad259. doi: 10.1093/ehjcr/ytad259. eCollection 2023 Jun.
9
Configuration of two-stent coronary bifurcation techniques in explanted beating hearts: the MOBBEM study.体外跳动心脏中双支架冠状动脉分叉技术的构建:MOBBEM 研究。
EuroIntervention. 2023 Aug 7;19(5):e423-e431. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-23-00063.
10
Complex distal left main bifurcation disease requiring a two-stent approach: in search of an accurate DEFINITION.需要双支架置入方法的复杂左主干远端分叉病变:探寻准确的定义
AsiaIntervention. 2023 Mar 15;9(1):11-13. doi: 10.4244/AIJ-E-22-00009. eCollection 2023 Mar.