• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

采用国家创伤数据库研究单纯性严重创伤性脑损伤的治疗趋势和住院病死率。

Treatment Trends and Inpatient Mortality in Isolated Severe Traumatic Brain Injury Using the National Trauma Data Bank.

机构信息

Department of Neurosurgery, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas, USA.

Department of Neurosurgery, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas, USA.

出版信息

World Neurosurg. 2022 Aug;164:e792-e798. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2022.05.048. Epub 2022 May 18.

DOI:10.1016/j.wneu.2022.05.048
PMID:35597537
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) remains a leading cause of morbidity and mortality. Despite recommendations from the Brain Trauma Foundation, there is wide variability in treatment paradigms for severe TBI. We aimed to elucidate the variability of treatment, particularly neurosurgical procedures and how it affects mortality.

METHODS

Adult patients (<65 years old) with a severe isolated TBI who were treated at an American College of Surgeons level I trauma center were identified in the National Trauma Data Bank for the years 2007-2016. International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision procedure codes were used to identify primary treatment approaches: intracranial pressure (ICP) monitoring and cranial surgery (craniotomy/craniectomy).

RESULTS

Among 25,327 patients with severe isolated TBI, 14.0% underwent ICP and 18.0% underwent cranial surgery. ICP monitoring reduced the odds of mortality (odds ratio 0.89, 95% confidence interval [0.81, 0.98]), but not the extent of cranial surgery (odds ratio 0.71, 95% confidence interval [0.65, 0.77]).

CONCLUSIONS

Brain Trauma Foundation guidelines recommend placement of an ICP monitor for severe TBI; however, only 14% of patients with isolated, severe TBI underwent ICP monitoring in 2007-2016. ICP monitoring and cranial surgery decrease the odds of inpatient mortality in patients with severe TBI.

摘要

背景

严重创伤性脑损伤(TBI)仍然是发病率和死亡率的主要原因。尽管脑外伤基金会提出了建议,但严重 TBI 的治疗模式仍存在很大差异。我们旨在阐明治疗的可变性,特别是神经外科手术及其如何影响死亡率。

方法

在美国外科医师学会一级创伤中心治疗的严重孤立性 TBI 成年患者(<65 岁)在国家创伤数据库中确定了 2007-2016 年的患者。使用国际疾病分类,第九修订版程序代码来识别主要治疗方法:颅内压(ICP)监测和颅骨手术(开颅术/颅骨切除术)。

结果

在 25327 例严重孤立性 TBI 患者中,14.0%接受了 ICP 监测,18.0%接受了颅骨手术。ICP 监测降低了死亡率的几率(比值比 0.89,95%置信区间 [0.81,0.98]),但不影响颅骨手术的程度(比值比 0.71,95%置信区间 [0.65,0.77])。

结论

脑外伤基金会指南建议对严重 TBI 进行 ICP 监测;然而,2007-2016 年,仅有 14%的孤立性严重 TBI 患者接受了 ICP 监测。ICP 监测和颅骨手术降低了严重 TBI 患者住院死亡率的几率。

相似文献

1
Treatment Trends and Inpatient Mortality in Isolated Severe Traumatic Brain Injury Using the National Trauma Data Bank.采用国家创伤数据库研究单纯性严重创伤性脑损伤的治疗趋势和住院病死率。
World Neurosurg. 2022 Aug;164:e792-e798. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2022.05.048. Epub 2022 May 18.
2
Intracranial pressure monitoring in severe traumatic brain injuries: a closer look at level 1 trauma centers in the United States.严重创伤性脑损伤的颅内压监测:深入研究美国的一级创伤中心
Injury. 2017 Sep;48(9):1944-1950. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2017.04.033. Epub 2017 Apr 20.
3
Intracranial pressure monitoring and inpatient mortality in severe traumatic brain injury: A propensity score-matched analysis.颅内压监测与严重创伤性脑损伤患者住院死亡率:倾向评分匹配分析。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2015 Mar;78(3):492-501; discussion 501-2. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000000559.
4
Use of Intracranial Pressure Monitoring in Patients with Severe Traumatic Brain Injury.颅内压监测在严重创伤性脑损伤患者中的应用。
World Neurosurg. 2020 Oct;142:e385-e395. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2020.07.022. Epub 2020 Jul 12.
5
Brain Trauma Foundation Guidelines for Intracranial Pressure Monitoring: Compliance and Effect on Outcome.脑创伤基金会颅内压监测指南:依从性及对预后的影响
World J Surg. 2017 Jun;41(6):1543-1549. doi: 10.1007/s00268-017-3898-6.
6
Variation in neurosurgical intervention for severe traumatic brain injury: The challenge of measuring quality in trauma center verification.神经外科干预严重创伤性脑损伤的变化:创伤中心验证中衡量质量的挑战。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2021 Jul 1;91(1):114-120. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000003114.
7
Utilization of Brain Tissue Oxygenation Monitoring and Association with Mortality Following Severe Traumatic Brain Injury.脑组织氧监测的利用及其与严重创伤性脑损伤后死亡率的关系。
Neurocrit Care. 2022 Apr;36(2):350-356. doi: 10.1007/s12028-021-01394-y. Epub 2021 Nov 29.
8
Increased mortality in patients with severe traumatic brain injury treated without intracranial pressure monitoring.未行颅内压监测的严重创伤性脑损伤患者死亡率增高。
J Neurosurg. 2012 Oct;117(4):729-34. doi: 10.3171/2012.7.JNS111816. Epub 2012 Aug 17.
9
Brain tissue oxygen monitoring in traumatic brain injury and major trauma: outcome analysis of a brain tissue oxygen-directed therapy.创伤性脑损伤和严重创伤中的脑组织氧监测:脑组织氧导向治疗的结果分析
J Neurosurg. 2009 Oct;111(4):672-82. doi: 10.3171/2009.4.JNS081150.
10
Statewide Trends in Intracranial Pressure Monitor Use in 36,915 Patients with Severe Traumatic Brain Injury in a Mature Trauma System over the Past 18 Years.18 年来成熟创伤体系中 36915 例严重创伤性脑损伤患者颅内压监测器使用的全州趋势。
World Neurosurg. 2019 Oct;130:e166-e171. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2019.06.025. Epub 2019 Jun 13.

引用本文的文献

1
Current practice of intracranial pressure monitoring in children with severe traumatic brain injury-a nationwide prospective surveillance study in Germany.德国儿童重型创伤性脑损伤颅内压监测的当前实践——一项全国性前瞻性监测研究
Front Pediatr. 2024 Feb 9;12:1355771. doi: 10.3389/fped.2024.1355771. eCollection 2024.
2
Characterizing Interhospital Variability in Neurosurgical Interventions for Patients with Mild Traumatic Brain Injury and Intracranial Hemorrhage.轻度创伤性脑损伤和颅内出血患者神经外科干预的医院间差异特征分析
Neurotrauma Rep. 2023 Mar 17;4(1):149-158. doi: 10.1089/neur.2022.0078. eCollection 2023.
3
Challenges in the Treatment of Severe Traumatic Brain Injury Based on Data in the Japan Neurotrauma Data Bank.
基于日本神经创伤数据库数据的重度创伤性脑损伤治疗挑战
Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo). 2023 Feb 15;63(2):43-47. doi: 10.2176/jns-nmc.2022-0276. Epub 2022 Nov 25.