School of Allied Health, Australian Catholic University, Brisbane, Australia.
Mater Research Institute-The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
Dev Med Child Neurol. 2022 Dec;64(12):1517-1523. doi: 10.1111/dmcn.15267. Epub 2022 May 21.
To investigate the prevalence and prognostic value of 'low-normal' motor skills in infants at high-risk for poor developmental outcomes.
Infants born extremely low-birthweight and extremely preterm discharged from neonatal intensive care between 2015 and 2018 completed the Alberta Infant Motor Scale (AIMS), Neuro-Sensory Motor Developmental Assessment (NSMDA) at corrected age 4, 8, and 12 months, and Griffiths Mental Development Scale at corrected age 12 months.
Participating infants (n = 191) with a mean gestational age (95% confidence interval [CI]) of 26.80 weeks (26.60, 27.1) and mean birthweight (95% CI) of 869 grams (843, 895) included 45 (23.80%) infants small for gestational age. AIMS rated 50.32%, 35.37%, and 14.86% of infants within the 'low-normal' motor skills range (1-2 SD below the mean for age) at 4, 8, and 12 months respectively. Of the infants within the AIMS 'low-normal' skills range, 55.70%, 88.46%, and 59.10% were classified as having impairment by NSMDA at 4, 8, and 12 months respectively. Griffiths assessment at 12 months identified only 7.33% of infants with 'low-normal' skills and 3.33% with motor disability. Minimal motor impairment rating on the NSMDA at 4 or 8 months significantly predicted general development at 12 months.
High-risk infants with 'low-normal' motor skills may warrant referral to early intervention as associated impairment represents increased risk for poorer general development outcomes.
High prevalence of 'low-normal' motor skill exists in high-risk infants. Clinical motor assessment validly identifies infants with motor impairment. Minimal motor impairment in high-risk infants is prognostic of general development. High-risk infants with 'low-normal' motor skills may warrant early intervention. Griffiths Scales of Child Development, Third Edition assessment at 12-months age may under-identify motor difficulties.
调查高危发育不良婴儿中“正常低值”运动技能的流行率和预后价值。
2015 年至 2018 年期间,从新生儿重症监护病房出院的极低出生体重和极早产儿婴儿完成了 Alberta 婴儿运动量表(AIMS)、神经感觉运动发育评估(NSMDA)在矫正年龄 4、8 和 12 个月,以及在矫正年龄 12 个月时进行 Griffiths 精神发育量表评估。
参与研究的婴儿(n=191)平均胎龄(95%置信区间[CI])为 26.80 周(26.60,27.1),平均出生体重(95%CI)为 869 克(843,895),其中 45 例(23.80%)婴儿为小于胎龄儿。AIMS 在 4、8 和 12 个月时分别将 50.32%、35.37%和 14.86%的婴儿评为“正常低值”运动技能范围(年龄平均水平以下 1-2 标准差)内。在 AIMS“正常低值”技能范围内的婴儿中,55.70%、88.46%和 59.10%分别在 4、8 和 12 个月时被 NSMDA 评定为有损伤。12 个月时 Griffiths 评估仅发现 7.33%的婴儿有“正常低值”技能,3.33%的婴儿有运动障碍。4 或 8 个月时 NSMDA 的轻微运动损伤评分显著预测了 12 个月时的总体发育。
高危婴儿中存在较高比例的“正常低值”运动技能,可能需要转介进行早期干预,因为相关损伤代表了更差的总体发育结果的风险增加。
高危婴儿中“正常低值”运动技能的发生率较高。临床运动评估可有效识别有运动障碍的婴儿。高危婴儿的轻微运动损伤与整体发育相关。高危婴儿中“正常低值”运动技能可能需要早期干预。12 个月时 Griffiths 儿童发展量表第三版评估可能会低估运动困难。