Sollmann Nico, Löffler Maximilian T, El Husseini Malek, Sekuboyina Anjany, Dieckmeyer Michael, Rühling Sebastian, Zimmer Claus, Menze Bjoern, Joseph Gabby B, Baum Thomas, Kirschke Jan S
Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, School of Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
TUM-Neuroimaging Center, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
J Bone Miner Res. 2022 Jul;37(7):1287-1296. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.4575. Epub 2022 Jun 15.
Opportunistic osteoporosis screening in nondedicated routine computed tomography (CT) is of increasing importance. The purpose of this study was to compare lumbar volumetric bone mineral density (vBMD) assessed by a convolutional neural network (CNN)-based framework in routine CT to vBMD from dedicated quantitative CT (QCT), and to evaluate the ability of vBMD and surrogate measurements of Hounsfield units (HU) to distinguish between patients with and without osteoporotic vertebral fractures (VFs). A total of 144 patients (median age: 70.7 years, 93 females) with clinical routine CT (eight different CT scanners, 120 kVp or 140 kVp, with and without intravenous contrast medium) and dedicated QCT acquired within ≤30 days were included. Vertebral measurements included (i) vBMD from the CNN-based approach including automated vertebral body labeling, segmentation, and correction of the contrast media phase for routine CT data (vBMD_OPP), (ii) vBMD from dedicated QCT (vBMD_QCT), and (iii) noncalibrated HU from vertebral bodies of routine CT data as previously proposed for immanent opportunistic osteoporosis screening based on CT attenuation. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) for vBMD_QCT versus vBMD_OPP indicated better agreement (ICC = 0.913) than the ICC for vBMD_QCT versus noncalibrated HU (ICC = 0.704). Bland-Altman analysis showed data points from 137 patients (95.1%) within the limits of agreement (LOA) of -23.2 to 25.0 mg/cm for vBMD_QCT versus vBMD_OPP. Osteoporosis (vBMD <80 mg/cm ) was detected in 89 patients (vBMD_QCT) and 88 patients (vBMD_OPP), whereas no patient crossed the diagnostic thresholds from normal vBMD to osteoporosis or vice versa. In a subcohort of 88 patients (thoracolumbar spine covered by imaging for VF reading), 69 patients showed one or more prevalent VFs, and the performance for discrimination between patients with and without VFs was best for vBMD_OPP (area under the curve [AUC] = 0.862; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.771-0.953). In conclusion, automated opportunistic osteoporosis screening in routine CT of various scanner setups is feasible and may demonstrate high diagnostic accuracy for prevalent VFs. © 2022 The Authors. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Society for Bone and Mineral Research (ASBMR).
在非专用的常规计算机断层扫描(CT)中进行机会性骨质疏松筛查的重要性日益增加。本研究的目的是比较基于卷积神经网络(CNN)的框架在常规CT中评估的腰椎体积骨密度(vBMD)与专用定量CT(QCT)的vBMD,并评估vBMD和亨氏单位(HU)替代测量值区分有无骨质疏松性椎体骨折(VF)患者的能力。纳入了144例患者(中位年龄:70.7岁,93例女性),这些患者在≤30天内同时进行了临床常规CT(8种不同的CT扫描仪,120 kVp或140 kVp,有或无静脉造影剂)和专用QCT检查。椎体测量包括:(i)基于CNN方法的vBMD,包括常规CT数据的自动椎体标记、分割和造影剂期校正(vBMD_OPP);(ii)专用QCT的vBMD(vBMD_QCT);(iii)常规CT数据椎体的未校准HU,如先前基于CT衰减进行即时机会性骨质疏松筛查所提议的那样。vBMD_QCT与vBMD_OPP的组内相关系数(ICC)显示出比vBMD_QCT与未校准HU的ICC(ICC = 0.704)更好的一致性(ICC = 0.913)。布兰德-奥特曼分析显示,vBMD_QCT与vBMD_OPP相比,137例患者(95.1%)的数据点在-23.2至25.0 mg/cm的一致性界限(LOA)内。89例患者(vBMD_QCT)和88例患者(vBMD_OPP)检测到骨质疏松(vBMD <80 mg/cm),而没有患者从正常vBMD跨越到骨质疏松的诊断阈值,反之亦然。在88例患者的亚组中(胸腰椎成像覆盖用于VF读数),69例患者显示一处或多处既往VF,vBMD_OPP区分有无VF患者的性能最佳(曲线下面积[AUC] = 0.862;95%置信区间[CI],0.771 - 0.953)。总之,在各种扫描仪设置的常规CT中进行自动机会性骨质疏松筛查是可行的,并且对于既往VF可能显示出较高的诊断准确性。© 2022作者。《骨与矿物质研究杂志》由威利期刊有限责任公司代表美国骨与矿物质研究学会(ASBMR)出版。