Department of Neuroradiology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Ismaninger Str. 22, 81675, Munich, Germany.
Department of Neurosurgery, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany.
Eur Radiol. 2019 Sep;29(9):4980-4989. doi: 10.1007/s00330-019-06018-w. Epub 2019 Feb 21.
To compare opportunistic quantitative CT (QCT) with dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) in their ability to predict incident vertebral fractures.
We included 84 patients aged 50 years and older, who had routine CT including the lumbar spine and DXA within a 12-month period (baseline) as well as follow-up imaging after at least 12 months or who sustained an incident vertebral fracture documented earlier. Patients with bone disorders aside from osteoporosis were excluded. Fracture status and trabecular bone mineral density (BMD) were retrospectively evaluated in baseline CT and fracture status was reassessed at follow-up. BMD was assessed by opportunistic QCT with asynchronous calibration of multiple MDCT scanners.
Sixteen patients had incident vertebral fractures showing lower mean BMD than patients without fracture (p = 0.001). For the risk of incident vertebral fractures, the hazard ratio increased per SD in BMD (4.07; 95% CI, 1.98-8.38), as well as after adjusting for age, sex, and prevalent fractures (2.54; 95% CI, 1.09-5.90). For DXA, a statistically significant increase in relative hazard per SD decrease in T-score was only observed after age and sex adjustment (1.57; 95% CI, 1.04-2.38). The predictability of incident vertebral fractures was good by BMD (AUC = 0.76; 95% CI, 0.64-0.89) and non-significant by T-scores. Asynchronously calibrated CT scanners showed good long-term stability (linear drift ranging from - 0.55 to - 2.29 HU per year).
Opportunistic screening of mainly neurosurgical and oncologic patients in CT performed for indications other than densitometry allows for better risk assessment of imminent vertebral fractures than dedicated DXA.
• Opportunistic QCT predicts osteoporotic vertebral fractures better than DXA reference standard in mainly neurosurgical and oncologic patients. • More than every second patient (56%) with an incident vertebral fracture was misdiagnosed not having osteoporosis according to DXA. • Standard ACR QCT-cutoff values for osteoporosis (< 80 mg/cm ) and osteopenia (≤ 120 mg/cm ) can also be applied scanner independently in calibrated opportunistic QCT.
比较机会性定量 CT(QCT)与双能 X 射线吸收法(DXA)在预测椎体骨折方面的能力。
我们纳入了 84 名年龄在 50 岁及以上的患者,他们在 12 个月内进行了常规 CT 检查,包括腰椎和 DXA(基线),以及至少 12 个月后进行了随访影像学检查,或更早记录到发生了椎体骨折。排除了除骨质疏松症以外的骨骼疾病患者。回顾性评估基线 CT 中的骨折情况和小梁骨矿物质密度(BMD),并在随访时重新评估骨折情况。通过机会性 QCT 对多个 MDCT 扫描仪进行异步校准来评估 BMD。
16 名患者发生了椎体骨折,其平均 BMD 低于未发生骨折的患者(p=0.001)。对于椎体骨折的风险,BMD 每增加一个标准差,风险比增加(4.07;95%CI,1.98-8.38),以及在调整年龄、性别和现有骨折后(2.54;95%CI,1.09-5.90)。对于 DXA,仅在调整年龄和性别后,T 评分每降低一个标准差,相对危险度才会显著增加(1.57;95%CI,1.04-2.38)。BMD 对预测椎体骨折具有良好的预测性(AUC=0.76;95%CI,0.64-0.89),而 T 评分无统计学意义。异步校准的 CT 扫描仪显示出良好的长期稳定性(每年线性漂移范围为-0.55 至-2.29 HU)。
在主要针对神经外科和肿瘤科患者的 CT 检查中进行机会性筛查,而不是专门进行骨密度测量,可以更好地评估即将发生的椎体骨折的风险,优于专门的 DXA。
在主要针对神经外科和肿瘤科患者的检查中,机会性 QCT 比 DXA 参考标准更能预测骨质疏松性椎体骨折。
根据 DXA,超过一半(56%)发生椎体骨折的患者被误诊为不患有骨质疏松症。
独立校准的机会性 QCT 也可应用标准 ACR QCT 骨质疏松症(<80 mg/cm 3 )和骨量减少(≤120 mg/cm 3 )的截断值。