• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

挑战联邦排斥:庇护城市中的移民安全、健康和医疗保健机会。

Challenging federal exclusion: Immigrant safety, health, and healthcare access in sanctuary cities.

机构信息

Institute of Health Equity and Social Justice Research, Northeastern University, 360 Huntington Ave., Boston, MA, 02115, USA; Department of Health Sciences, Northeastern University, 360 Huntington Ave., Boston, MA, 02115, USA.

Institute of Health Equity and Social Justice Research, Northeastern University, 360 Huntington Ave., Boston, MA, 02115, USA; Department of Sociology and Anthropology, Northeastern University, 360 Huntington Ave., Boston, MA, 02115, USA.

出版信息

Health Place. 2022 May;75:102822. doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2022.102822. Epub 2022 May 19.

DOI:10.1016/j.healthplace.2022.102822
PMID:35598346
Abstract

As the United States (U.S.) continues to prioritize federal immigration enforcement, subnational localities increasingly enact their own immigration policies. Cities limiting cooperation with federal immigration enforcement are commonly referred to as sanctuary cities, which aim to improve immigrant safety and wellbeing. Yet, little is known about how these cities accomplish this beyond immigration enforcement non-cooperation. We draw from qualitative interviews with 54 organizational workers in Seattle, Washington and Boston, Massachusetts. Our findings illuminate lingering challenges immigrants face within sanctuary cities and demonstrate how organizational workers mitigate the shortcomings of sanctuary policies to addressing broad definitions of safety and health by enacting their own sanctuary practices.

摘要

随着美国继续优先执行联邦移民执法,州以下的地方越来越多地制定自己的移民政策。限制与联邦移民执法合作的城市通常被称为“庇护城市”,旨在提高移民的安全和福祉。然而,除了不合作执行移民执法之外,这些城市如何实现这一目标知之甚少。我们从华盛顿州西雅图和马萨诸塞州波士顿的 54 名组织工作人员的定性访谈中得出了这些发现。我们的研究结果揭示了庇护城市中移民仍然面临的挑战,并展示了组织工作人员如何通过实施自己的庇护实践来减轻庇护政策的缺陷,以应对更广泛的安全和健康定义。

相似文献

1
Challenging federal exclusion: Immigrant safety, health, and healthcare access in sanctuary cities.挑战联邦排斥:庇护城市中的移民安全、健康和医疗保健机会。
Health Place. 2022 May;75:102822. doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2022.102822. Epub 2022 May 19.
2
Messaging inclusion with consequence: U.S. sanctuary cities and immigrant wellbeing.带有后果的信息纳入:美国的庇护城市与移民福祉。
J Migr Health. 2023 Jul 22;8:100199. doi: 10.1016/j.jmh.2023.100199. eCollection 2023.
3
Order Keepers or Immigration Agents? Latine Immigrant Views of Law Enforcement in Healthcare Settings.秩序维护者还是移民代理?医疗环境中拉丁裔移民对执法者的看法。
J Gen Intern Med. 2024 Aug;39(11):2051-2059. doi: 10.1007/s11606-024-08767-x. Epub 2024 May 2.
4
The Relationship Between States' Immigrant-Related Policies and Access to Health Care Among Children of Immigrants.**国家移民相关政策与移民儿童获得医疗保健之间的关系**
J Immigr Minor Health. 2022 Aug;24(4):834-841. doi: 10.1007/s10903-021-01282-9. Epub 2021 Sep 28.
5
Caught Between a Well-Intentioned State and a Hostile Federal System: Local Implementation of Inclusive Immigrant Policies.夹在善意的州政府和敌对的联邦系统之间:包容性移民政策的地方实施。
Milbank Q. 2023 Dec;101(4):1348-1374. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12671. Epub 2023 Sep 14.
6
Do sanctuary policies increase crime? Contrary evidence from a county-level investigation in the United States.庇护政策会增加犯罪率吗?来自美国一项县级调查的相反证据。
Soc Sci Res. 2022 Aug;106:102743. doi: 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2022.102743. Epub 2022 May 19.
7
A Content Analysis Of US Sanctuary Immigration Policies: Implications For Research In Social Determinants Of Health.美国庇护移民政策的内容分析:对健康社会决定因素研究的启示。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2021 Jul;40(7):1145-1153. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2021.00097.
8
Examining the Impact of Restrictive Federal Immigration Policies on Healthcare Access: Perspectives from Immigrant Patients across an Urban Safety-Net Hospital.审查联邦限制移民政策对医疗保健获取的影响:城市保障网医院中移民患者的观点。
J Immigr Minor Health. 2022 Feb;24(1):178-187. doi: 10.1007/s10903-021-01177-9. Epub 2021 Mar 12.
9
State Preemption of Local Immigration "Sanctuary" Policies: Legal Considerations.州政府对地方移民“庇护”政策的干预:法律考量。
Am J Public Health. 2021 Feb;111(2):259-264. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2020.306018. Epub 2020 Dec 22.
10
State Preemption of Municipal Laws and Policies that Protect Immigrant Communities: Impact on Latine Health and Well-Being in North Carolina.州政府对保护移民社区的地方法律和政策的干预:对北卡罗来纳州拉丁裔健康和福祉的影响。
Inquiry. 2022 Jan-Dec;59:469580221087884. doi: 10.1177/00469580221087884.

引用本文的文献

1
Impacts of local, provincial, and federal immigration policies on health and social services access among women with precarious immigration status.地方、省级和联邦移民政策对移民身份不稳定女性获得健康和社会服务的影响。
BMC Public Health. 2025 Apr 28;25(1):1570. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-22673-9.
2
Second-Class Care: How Immigration Law Transforms Clinical Practice in the Safety Net.二等医疗:移民法如何改变安全网中的临床实践
J Health Soc Behav. 2025 Mar;66(1):109-123. doi: 10.1177/00221465241254390. Epub 2024 Jul 27.
3
Messaging inclusion with consequence: U.S. sanctuary cities and immigrant wellbeing.
带有后果的信息纳入:美国的庇护城市与移民福祉。
J Migr Health. 2023 Jul 22;8:100199. doi: 10.1016/j.jmh.2023.100199. eCollection 2023.