Suppr超能文献

州政府对地方移民“庇护”政策的干预:法律考量。

State Preemption of Local Immigration "Sanctuary" Policies: Legal Considerations.

机构信息

Mark A. Hall, Lilli Mann-Jackson, and Scott D. Rhodes are with the Department of Social Science and Health Policy, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC.

出版信息

Am J Public Health. 2021 Feb;111(2):259-264. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2020.306018. Epub 2020 Dec 22.

Abstract

States have enacted a wave of statutes over the past several years preempting local government law and policies that potentially promote public health in various ways. Among these local preemption measures are statutes in at least 9 states that outlaw municipal policies providing some form of "sanctuary" to immigrants. Such policies, and their preemption, have importance both for direct access to health services and for broader social determinants of health.This article gauges the coverage and potential impact of these state preemption laws based on key informant interviews nationally and a close legal analysis of relevant laws and policy documents. It distinguishes between preemption laws focused on law enforcement cooperation and those that also encompass a wider array of "welcoming" policies and initiatives. It also distinguishes between more passive forms of preemption that prohibit barring cooperation with federal immigration enforcement, and those statutes that more affirmatively require active measures to assist federal enforcement.Drawing these distinctions can help municipalities determine which immigrant-supportive measures are still permitted, and how best to mitigate the adverse public health effects of these preemption laws.

摘要

近年来,各州颁布了一系列法规,预先阻止地方政府以各种方式促进公共健康的法律和政策。这些地方预先阻止措施包括至少 9 个州的法规,禁止提供某种形式的“庇护”给移民的市政政策。这些政策及其预先阻止措施对于直接获得医疗服务以及更广泛的健康社会决定因素都具有重要意义。本文根据全国范围内的关键知情人访谈和对相关法律和政策文件的密切法律分析,评估了这些州预先阻止法律的覆盖范围和潜在影响。它区分了侧重于执法合作的预先阻止法律和那些还包括更广泛的“欢迎”政策和举措的法律。它还区分了更被动形式的预先阻止,这些阻止禁止与联邦移民执法部门合作,以及那些更积极地要求采取积极措施协助联邦执法的法规。区分这些可以帮助市政府确定哪些支持移民的措施仍然是允许的,以及如何最好地减轻这些预先阻止法律对公共健康的不利影响。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

8
How Preemption Can Lead to Inequity.先发制人如何导致不平等。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Aug 23;19(17):10476. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191710476.

本文引用的文献

6
Restrictive ID Policies: Implications for Health Equity.限制性身份政策:对健康公平的影响。
J Immigr Minor Health. 2018 Apr;20(2):255-260. doi: 10.1007/s10903-017-0579-3.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验