Intensive Care Unit, Uberlândia Clinical Hospital, Uberlândia Federal University, Uberlândia, Minas Gerais, Brazil; Health Science PhD Program, Faculty of Medicine, Uberlândia Federal University, Uberlândia, Minas Gerais, Brazil; Neurointensivism Postgraduate Program, Teaching and Research Institute, Sírio-Libanês Hospital, Bela Vista, São Paulo, Brazil.
Intensive Care Unit, Uberlândia Clinical Hospital, Uberlândia Federal University, Uberlândia, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Med Intensiva (Engl Ed). 2022 May;46(5):259-268. doi: 10.1016/j.medine.2020.09.010.
Ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) is related with high mortality, duration of mechanical ventilation and costs. Recent studies have questioned the safety and effectiveness of oral chlorhexidine to prevent VAP. We sought to verify whether the adverse effects of this substance outweigh its benefits. We searched several databases and selected studies that investigated the use of oral chlorhexidine and its impact on mortality. No association between oral chlorhexidine and lower VAP rates was found on meta-analyses of double-blind randomized trials, however significant increase in mortality was reported. It is speculated that chlorhexidine can cause damage to several organic sectors and cytotoxicity. Although it still can be beneficial in specific settings, robust evidence to recommend its routine application for all mechanically ventilated patients is lacking; therefore, given the possibility of harm, it would be better to follow the principle of non-maleficence until more studies becomes available.
呼吸机相关性肺炎(VAP)与高死亡率、机械通气时间和成本有关。最近的研究对氯己定口腔护理预防 VAP 的安全性和有效性提出了质疑。我们试图验证这种物质的不良反应是否超过其益处。我们检索了多个数据库,并选择了研究氯己定口腔护理及其对死亡率影响的研究。然而,对双盲随机试验的荟萃分析并未发现氯己定口腔护理与较低的 VAP 发生率之间存在关联,但报告称死亡率显著增加。据推测,氯己定可能会对多个有机部位造成损害并产生细胞毒性。尽管在特定情况下氯己定口腔护理可能仍然有益,但缺乏强有力的证据来推荐其常规应用于所有机械通气患者;因此,鉴于可能造成的危害,在更多研究结果出现之前,最好遵循不伤害原则。