Vieira P C, de Oliveira R B, da Silva Mendonça T M
Intensive Care Unit, Uberlândia Clinical Hospital, Uberlândia Federal University, Uberlândia, Minas Gerais, Brazil; Health Science PhD Program, Faculty of Medicine, Uberlândia Federal University, Uberlândia, Minas Gerais, Brazil; Neurointensivism Postgraduate Program, Teaching and Research Institute, Sírio-Libanês Hospital, Bela Vista, São Paulo, Brazil.
Intensive Care Unit, Uberlândia Clinical Hospital, Uberlândia Federal University, Uberlândia, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Med Intensiva (Engl Ed). 2020 Nov 4. doi: 10.1016/j.medin.2020.09.009.
Ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) is related with high mortality, duration of mechanical ventilation and costs. Recent studies have questioned the safety and effectiveness of oral chlorhexidine to prevent VAP. We sought to verify whether the adverse effects of this substance outweigh its benefits. We searched several databases and selected studies that investigated the use of oral chlorhexidine and its impact on mortality. No association between oral chlorhexidine and lower VAP rates was found on meta-analyses of double-blind randomized trials, however significant increase in mortality was reported. It is speculated that chlorhexidine can cause damage to several organic sectors and cytotoxicity. Although it still can be beneficial in specific settings, robust evidence to recommend its routine application for all mechanically ventilated patients is lacking; therefore, given the possibility of harm, it would be better to follow the principle of non-maleficence until more studies becomes available.
呼吸机相关性肺炎(VAP)与高死亡率、机械通气时间及费用相关。近期研究对口服洗必泰预防VAP的安全性和有效性提出了质疑。我们试图验证该物质的不良反应是否超过其益处。我们检索了多个数据库,并选择了研究口服洗必泰的使用及其对死亡率影响的研究。在对双盲随机试验的荟萃分析中,未发现口服洗必泰与较低的VAP发生率之间存在关联,但报告称死亡率显著增加。据推测,洗必泰可对多个有机部位造成损害并具有细胞毒性。尽管在特定情况下它仍可能有益,但缺乏有力证据推荐对所有机械通气患者常规应用;因此,鉴于存在危害的可能性,在有更多研究之前,遵循不伤害原则可能更好。