• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Research to law: A qualitative study of Massachusetts' 2018 Care Act expanding emergency department initiation of medication for opioid use disorder.研究法律:对马萨诸塞州 2018 年护理法案扩大急诊部门启动阿片类药物使用障碍药物治疗的定性研究。
J Subst Abuse Treat. 2022 Oct;141:108803. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2022.108803. Epub 2022 May 17.
2
"Sick and tired of being sick and tired": Exploring initiation of medications for opioid use disorder among people experiencing homelessness.“厌倦了生病和疲惫”:探索在无家可归者中开始使用治疗阿片类药物使用障碍的药物。
J Subst Abuse Treat. 2022 Jul;138:108752. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2022.108752. Epub 2022 Feb 23.
3
Massachusetts Justice Community Opioid Innovation Network (MassJCOIN).马萨诸塞州司法社区阿片类药物创新网络(MassJCOIN)。
J Subst Abuse Treat. 2021 Sep;128:108275. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2021.108275. Epub 2021 Jan 8.
4
Evaluation of an emergency department-based opioid overdose survivor intervention: Difference-in-difference analysis of electronic health record data to assess key outcomes.评价基于急诊科的阿片类药物过量幸存者干预措施:电子健康记录数据的差异分析评估关键结局。
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2021 Apr 1;221:108595. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2021.108595. Epub 2021 Feb 15.
5
Implementation of emergency department-initiated buprenorphine for opioid use disorder in a rural southern state.美国南部农村一州急诊科启动丁丙诺啡治疗阿片类物质使用障碍的实施情况
J Subst Abuse Treat. 2020 Mar;112S:73-78. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2020.02.007.
6
Emergency Department Peer Support Program and Patient Outcomes After Opioid Overdose.急诊室同伴支持计划对阿片类药物过量患者结局的影响。
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Mar 4;7(3):e243614. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.3614.
7
Experiences of patients at high risk of opioid overdose accessing emergency department and behavioral health interventions: a qualitative analysis in an urban emergency department.高危阿片类药物过量患者在城市急诊部门接受急诊和行为健康干预的体验:一项定性分析。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Apr 18;23(1):370. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-09387-7.
8
The Opioid-overdose Reduction Continuum of Care Approach (ORCCA): Evidence-based practices in the HEALing Communities Study.阿片类药物过量减少关怀连续体方法(ORCCA):HEALing 社区研究中的循证实践。
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2020 Dec 1;217:108325. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2020.108325. Epub 2020 Oct 4.
9
Jail-based reentry programming to support continued treatment with medications for opioid use disorder: Qualitative perspectives and experiences among jail staff in Massachusetts.基于监狱的重新融入计划,以支持继续使用药物治疗阿片类药物使用障碍:马萨诸塞州监狱工作人员的定性观点和经验。
Int J Drug Policy. 2022 Nov;109:103823. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2022.103823. Epub 2022 Aug 19.
10
Provider perceptions of medication for opioid used disorder (MOUD): A qualitative study in communities with high opioid overdose death rates.提供者对阿片类药物使用障碍(MOUD)药物的看法:在阿片类药物过量死亡率高的社区进行的定性研究。
Subst Abus. 2022;43(1):742-748. doi: 10.1080/08897077.2021.2007518.

引用本文的文献

1
Facilitators of and barriers to buprenorphine initiation in the emergency department: a scoping review.急诊科丁丙诺啡起始治疗的促进因素和障碍:一项范围综述
Lancet Reg Health Am. 2024 Sep 28;38:100899. doi: 10.1016/j.lana.2024.100899. eCollection 2024 Oct.

本文引用的文献

1
Policymakers' Research Capacities, Engagement, and Use of Research in Public Health Policymaking.政策制定者的研究能力、参与度以及在公共卫生政策制定中对研究的利用。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Oct 20;18(21):11014. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182111014.
2
Intervention Stigma toward Medications for Opioid Use Disorder: A Systematic Review.干预污名化与阿片类药物使用障碍治疗:系统综述
Subst Use Misuse. 2021;56(14):2181-2201. doi: 10.1080/10826084.2021.1975749. Epub 2021 Sep 20.
3
A practical review of buprenorphine utilization for the emergency physician in the era of decreased prescribing restrictions.在处方限制减少的时代,急诊医师实用的丁丙诺啡使用回顾。
Am J Emerg Med. 2021 Oct;48:316-322. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2021.06.065. Epub 2021 Jul 5.
4
Lawmakers' use of scientific evidence can be improved.立法者对科学证据的使用可以得到改善。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021 Mar 2;118(9). doi: 10.1073/pnas.2012955118.
5
A Rapid Review of the Impact of Systems-Level Policies and Interventions on Population-Level Outcomes Related to the Opioid Epidemic, United States and Canada, 2014-2018.2014 - 2018年美国和加拿大系统层面政策与干预措施对与阿片类药物流行相关的人群层面结果影响的快速回顾
Public Health Rep. 2020 Jul/Aug;135(1_suppl):100S-127S. doi: 10.1177/0033354920922975.
6
Dissemination Strategies to Accelerate the Policy Impact of Children's Mental Health Services Research.加速儿童心理健康服务研究政策影响的传播策略
Psychiatr Serv. 2020 Nov 1;71(11):1170-1178. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.201900527. Epub 2020 Jun 10.
7
Opioid Use Disorder Treatment Facilities With Programs for Special Populations.治疗特殊人群阿片类使用障碍的机构和项目。
Am J Prev Med. 2020 Sep;59(3):e125-e133. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2020.03.022. Epub 2020 May 21.
8
Adolescent-Serving Addiction Treatment Facilities in the United States and the Availability of Medications for Opioid Use Disorder.美国的青少年成瘾治疗机构和阿片类药物使用障碍药物的可及性。
J Adolesc Health. 2020 Oct;67(4):542-549. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2020.03.005. Epub 2020 Apr 24.
9
Receipt of Addiction Treatment After Opioid Overdose Among Medicaid-Enrolled Adolescents and Young Adults.接受阿片类药物过量治疗的 Medicaid 参保青少年和年轻人。
JAMA Pediatr. 2020 Mar 1;174(3):e195183. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2019.5183. Epub 2020 Mar 2.
10
Improving the use of evidence in public health policy development, enactment and implementation: a multiple-case study.提高证据在公共卫生政策制定、颁布和实施中的使用:一项多案例研究。
Health Educ Res. 2019 Apr 1;34(2):129-144. doi: 10.1093/her/cyy050.

研究法律:对马萨诸塞州 2018 年护理法案扩大急诊部门启动阿片类药物使用障碍药物治疗的定性研究。

Research to law: A qualitative study of Massachusetts' 2018 Care Act expanding emergency department initiation of medication for opioid use disorder.

机构信息

Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Division of Adolescent/Young Adult Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, 200 North Wolfe Street, Baltimore, MD 21287, United States of America; Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Department of Population, Family, and Reproductive Health, 615 N Wolfe Street, Baltimore, MD 21205, United States of America.

Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Division of Adolescent/Young Adult Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, 200 North Wolfe Street, Baltimore, MD 21287, United States of America.

出版信息

J Subst Abuse Treat. 2022 Oct;141:108803. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2022.108803. Epub 2022 May 17.

DOI:10.1016/j.jsat.2022.108803
PMID:35599095
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9398949/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Initiating medication for opioid use disorder (MOUD) during emergency department (ED) visits is an important innovation to engage individuals in addiction treatment. In 2018, Massachusetts passed the CARE Act, becoming the first state to legislate that hospitals with EDs must be able to offer MOUD. We performed a qualitative study to explore factors influencing policy enactment.

METHODS

Semi-structured interviews were conducted in 2019 with ten key stakeholders involved in the policymaking process representing state government, hospitals, physician professional societies, and recovery/behavioral health organizations. Data were analyzed in 2020-2021 using a hybrid inductive-deductive approach.

RESULTS

The first key theme stakeholders expressed was the importance of research and public health consensus; they described consensus building within existing coalitions regarding the pressing need for action, and supporting expansion of treatment with this evidence-based strategy. Second, stakeholders discussed overcoming financing and feasibility concerns by passing budget-neutral legislation and ensuring flexibility for diverse hospital types. Lastly, stakeholders looked towards implementation, describing the implementation guide development process and ensuring capacity for continuing treatment existed throughout the state.

CONCLUSIONS

This study suggests that research supporting the effectiveness of ED MOUD induction drove the passage of this state legislation. Long-term collaboration between diverse stakeholders towards a common goal of increasing access to evidence-based treatment to address the opioid epidemic was also perceived as facilitating the law's passage. Policymakers and advocates in other states may look towards Massachusetts's legislative process as a model for implementing similar legislation as part of their strategies to address the drug overdose crisis.

摘要

背景

在急诊部 (ED) 就诊时开始使用阿片类药物使用障碍 (MOUD) 的药物治疗是让个人参与成瘾治疗的一项重要创新。2018 年,马萨诸塞州通过了 CARE 法案,成为第一个立法规定必须能够在拥有 ED 的医院提供 MOUD 的州。我们进行了一项定性研究,以探讨影响政策实施的因素。

方法

2019 年,我们对参与决策过程的十位关键利益相关者进行了半结构化访谈,这些利益相关者代表州政府、医院、医生专业协会和康复/行为健康组织。2020-2021 年,我们使用混合归纳演绎方法对数据进行了分析。

结果

利益相关者首先表达的一个关键主题是研究和公共卫生共识的重要性;他们描述了在现有联盟内就采取行动的紧迫需求达成共识,并支持通过这种基于证据的策略扩大治疗范围。其次,利益相关者讨论了通过无预算影响的立法和确保不同类型医院的灵活性来克服融资和可行性问题。最后,利益相关者着眼于实施,描述了实施指南的制定过程,并确保全州都有继续治疗的能力。

结论

这项研究表明,支持 ED MOUD 诱导有效性的研究推动了该州立法的通过。不同利益相关者之间为增加获得基于证据的治疗以解决阿片类药物流行而长期合作,也被认为有助于该法律的通过。其他州的政策制定者和倡导者可能会将马萨诸塞州的立法过程视为实施类似立法的模式,作为解决药物过量危机战略的一部分。