Suppr超能文献

教师对促进医学生纵向学习的观点:一项混合方法研究。

Faculty perspectives on facilitating medical students' longitudinal learning: A mixed-methods study.

机构信息

Cambridge Integrated Clerkship, Harvard Medical School/Cambridge Health Alliance, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.

Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

出版信息

Med Educ. 2022 Oct;56(10):1002-1016. doi: 10.1111/medu.14842. Epub 2022 Jun 14.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Medical students' longitudinal care of patients supports clinical learning and promotes patient-centredness. The literature presents little empirically derived guidance for faculty to facilitate students' longitudinal learning and care. Informed by the conceptual framework of relational learning, this study investigated faculty perspectives about longitudinal teaching, their strategies for facilitating students' longitudinal learning and perceived barriers and enablers.

METHODS

Using a convergent mixed-methods approach at a single academic medical centre, the authors conducted a survey and two focus groups in 2018-2019 with faculty members teaching in three longitudinal clinical courses. Quantitative analyses included descriptive statistics and chi-square tests. Qualitative content analysis described deductive categories and identified inductive themes.

RESULTS

Forty-three eligible faculty (69%) completed the survey. Ninety-one percent (n = 39) reported that teaching in a longitudinal model enhanced their experience as preceptors. Faculty described activities students performed to provide longitudinal care: spending time with patients independently (n = 38, 88%), making follow-up phone calls (n = 35; 81%) and participating in home- and community-based visits (n = 20, 47%), among others. Twelve faculty participated in two focus groups. Deductive analysis characterised strategies for facilitating students' longitudinal learning and barriers and enablers. Strategies included "encouraging students to follow patients," "faculty adaptability," "offering guidance and setting expectations," and "careful patient selection." Barriers included scheduling limitations, and enablers included student initiative. Inductive analysis identified two themes: faculty goals for students and faculty benefits from teaching. Goals included meaningful engagement with patients and their illness over time. Benefits from teaching included personal gratification, mentorship, and holistic student assessment.

DISCUSSION

Our survey and focus group findings demonstrated positive faculty attitudes and experiences, characterised faculty goals and approaches, and identified elements of the educational context that hindered or facilitated longitudinal teaching and learning. This study's faculty perspectives build upon prior investigations of students' and patients' perspectives, offer teaching strategies, and may guide faculty development.

摘要

简介

医学生对患者的纵向护理支持临床学习并促进以患者为中心。文献中很少有经验性的指导来为教师提供便利,以促进学生的纵向学习和护理。本研究以关系学习的概念框架为指导,调查了教师对纵向教学的看法、他们促进学生纵向学习的策略以及感知到的障碍和促进因素。

方法

在 2018-2019 年期间,在单一学术医疗中心采用汇聚式混合方法,作者对教授三门纵向临床课程的 43 名教师进行了调查和两次焦点小组讨论。定量分析包括描述性统计和卡方检验。定性内容分析描述了演绎类别,并确定了归纳主题。

结果

43 名符合条件的教师(69%)完成了调查。91%(n=39)的教师报告说,在纵向教学模式中教学增强了他们作为导师的体验。教师描述了学生提供纵向护理的活动:与患者独立相处(n=38,88%)、进行随访电话(n=35;81%)和参与家庭和社区访问(n=20,47%)等。12 名教师参加了两次焦点小组。演绎分析描述了促进学生纵向学习以及障碍和促进因素的策略。策略包括“鼓励学生跟随患者”、“教师适应性”、“提供指导和设定期望”以及“仔细选择患者”。障碍包括日程安排限制,促进因素包括学生的主动性。归纳分析确定了两个主题:教师对学生的目标和教师从教学中获得的益处。目标包括随着时间的推移与患者及其疾病进行有意义的互动。教学的好处包括个人满足感、指导和全面的学生评估。

讨论

我们的调查和焦点小组发现表明教师对学生和患者的态度和经验都是积极的,描述了教师的目标和方法,并确定了阻碍或促进纵向教学和学习的教育环境要素。本研究的教师观点建立在先前对学生和患者观点的调查基础上,提供了教学策略,并可能为教师发展提供指导。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验