• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

了解柬埔寨护理专业学生在基于案例学习过程中的能力:一项聚合混合方法研究。

Understanding competency of nursing students in the course of case-based learning in Cambodia: a convergent mixed method study.

作者信息

Koto-Shimada Kyoko, Carandang Rogie Royce, Shibanuma Akira, Kiriya Junko, Ong Ken Ing Cherng, Touch Sokneang, Koy Virya, Jimba Masamine

机构信息

Department of Community and Global Health, School of International Health, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyoku, Tokyo, 113-0033, Japan.

Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Connecticut School of Medicine, 263 Farmington Avenue, Farmington, Storrs, Connecticut, 06030-6325, USA.

出版信息

BMC Nurs. 2023 Aug 11;22(1):265. doi: 10.1186/s12912-023-01420-8.

DOI:10.1186/s12912-023-01420-8
PMID:37568231
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10416455/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

In the last decade, nursing education has begun to reform to competency-based education worldwide, including in low-and middle-income countries. Case-Based Learning (CBL), an approach to delivering competency-based education, contributes to acquiring critical thinking competency, problem-solving, higher knowledge, professional value and attitude. However, it needs to be taught in a culturally appropriate manner. In Cambodia, CBL was initiated in a classroom and clinical practicum by faculty and preceptors who graduated from the upgrading course. This study examined the factors associated with the competency level of nursing students, explored the practice and perceptions of teaching-learning activities among students, faculty members and preceptors and assessed the coherence of qualitative and quantitative findings.

METHODS

This was a convergent, mixed methods study. Data were collected from eight educational institutions for quantitative and qualitative studies and seven hospitals for qualitative studies. From June to September 2019, a cross-sectional survey of nursing students in the third year of the three-year programme (n = 719), eight focus group discussions (FGDs; n = 55) with 6-8 members and 15 FGDs with faculty (n = 38) and clinical preceptors (n = 37) with 4-7 members were conducted to elicit the teaching-learning experience and perceptions. Multiple linear regression was performed to investigate the factors associated with student competency. Moreover, the study conducted thematic content analysis on the qualitative data. The integrated analysis was presented as side-by-side joint displays.

RESULTS

First, the quantitative and qualitative findings confirmed each other 's CBL learning experiences. Students had higher levels of nursing competencies if they had CBL experiences, both in the classroom and clinical practicum, both in a group manner. Next, the quantitative and qualitative findings complemented students' academic satisfaction with the teaching by faculty members and preceptors. Finally, the quantitative and qualitative findings were expanded to explain students' academic satisfaction with the programme.

CONCLUSIONS

The finding of CBL experiences in a group and students' satisfaction with faculty members' and preceptors' teaching improved nursing students' competency development. Meanwhile, students' satisfaction with the design and delivery of the educational programme provides implications for policy level to narrow the theory and practice gaps in low- and middle-income countries.

摘要

背景

在过去十年中,全球范围内的护理教育已开始向基于能力的教育改革,包括在低收入和中等收入国家。基于案例的学习(CBL)是一种提供基于能力教育的方法,有助于培养批判性思维能力、解决问题的能力、更高的知识水平、专业价值观和态度。然而,需要以适合文化背景的方式进行教学。在柬埔寨,CBL由参加过升级课程的教师和带教老师在课堂和临床实习中开展。本研究调查了与护理专业学生能力水平相关的因素,探讨了学生、教师和带教老师对教学活动的实践和看法,并评估了定性和定量研究结果的一致性。

方法

这是一项收敛性混合方法研究。从八所教育机构收集数据用于定量和定性研究,从七家医院收集数据用于定性研究。2019年6月至9月,对三年制课程三年级的护理专业学生(n = 719)进行了横断面调查,与6 - 8名成员进行了八次焦点小组讨论(FGD;n = 55),与4 - 7名成员的教师(n = 38)和临床带教老师(n = 37)进行了15次焦点小组讨论,以了解教学经验和看法。进行多元线性回归以调查与学生能力相关的因素。此外,该研究对定性数据进行了主题内容分析。综合分析以并排联合展示的形式呈现。

结果

首先,定量和定性研究结果相互印证了CBL学习经历。如果学生在课堂和临床实习中都有CBL经历,且都是以小组形式进行,他们的护理能力水平会更高。其次,定量和定性研究结果补充了学生对教师和带教老师教学的学术满意度。最后,定量和定性研究结果得到扩展,以解释学生对该课程的学术满意度。

结论

小组形式的CBL经历以及学生对教师和带教老师教学的满意度的研究结果促进了护理专业学生能力的发展。同时,学生对教育课程设计和实施的满意度为政策层面缩小低收入和中等收入国家理论与实践差距提供了启示。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bf98/10416455/dfd9ed20e9ae/12912_2023_1420_Figb_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bf98/10416455/1f8975d97e13/12912_2023_1420_Figa_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bf98/10416455/dfd9ed20e9ae/12912_2023_1420_Figb_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bf98/10416455/1f8975d97e13/12912_2023_1420_Figa_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bf98/10416455/dfd9ed20e9ae/12912_2023_1420_Figb_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Understanding competency of nursing students in the course of case-based learning in Cambodia: a convergent mixed method study.了解柬埔寨护理专业学生在基于案例学习过程中的能力:一项聚合混合方法研究。
BMC Nurs. 2023 Aug 11;22(1):265. doi: 10.1186/s12912-023-01420-8.
2
Nursing student and faculty competency improvement through a nurse-bridging program in Cambodia.通过柬埔寨的护士衔接计划提高护理学生和教师的能力。
Nurse Educ Today. 2020 Oct;93:104523. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2020.104523. Epub 2020 Jun 28.
3
Student and educator experiences of maternal-child simulation-based learning: a systematic review of qualitative evidence protocol.基于母婴模拟学习的学生和教育工作者体验:定性证据协议的系统评价
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):14-26. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1694.
4
The experiences of nursing master's students with dialogic case-based learning in an evidence-based nursing course: A qualitative study.护理硕士研究生在循证护理课程中对话式案例学习的体验:一项定性研究。
Nurse Educ Today. 2022 Jul;114:105395. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2022.105395. Epub 2022 May 9.
5
Exploring factors affecting the facilitation of nursing students to learn paediatric pain management in Rwanda: A descriptive qualitative study.探讨影响卢旺达护理学生学习儿科疼痛管理的促进因素:一项描述性定性研究。
PLoS One. 2022 Feb 16;17(2):e0263609. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0263609. eCollection 2022.
6
Nursing student and professor perceptions and assessments of the achievement of practicum competencies: A mixed method approach.护理专业学生和教授对实习能力达成情况的认知与评估:一种混合方法研究
Nurse Educ Today. 2016 Oct;45:199-205. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2016.08.013. Epub 2016 Aug 11.
7
Feasibility and outcomes of paid undergraduate student nurse positions.本科护生带薪岗位的可行性与结果
Nurs Leadersh (Tor Ont). 2006 Sep;19(3):e1-14. doi: 10.12927/cjnl.2006.19032.
8
Clinical nurse preceptors' perception of e-portfolio use for undergraduate students.临床护士带教老师对本科生使用电子档案袋的看法。
J Prof Nurs. 2017 Jul-Aug;33(4):276-281. doi: 10.1016/j.profnurs.2016.11.001. Epub 2016 Nov 17.
9
Nurse preceptors' experiences of promoting and teaching fundamental care to undergraduate nursing students: A qualitative study.护士导师在本科护生基本照护促进和教学方面的体验:一项定性研究。
J Adv Nurs. 2023 Mar;79(3):1094-1106. doi: 10.1111/jan.15372. Epub 2022 Jul 19.
10
A Clinical Teaching Blended Learning Program to Enhance Registered Nurse Preceptors' Teaching Competencies: Pretest and Posttest Study.一项提高注册护士带教老师教学能力的临床教学混合式学习项目:前测与后测研究
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Apr 24;22(4):e18604. doi: 10.2196/18604.

引用本文的文献

1
Exploring nursing students' reality shock and professional behavioral development in clinical practice: a hermeneutic phenomenological study.探索护理专业学生在临床实践中的现实冲击与专业行为发展:一项诠释现象学研究。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2025 Mar 6;12:1490975. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1490975. eCollection 2025.

本文引用的文献

1
Medium-term outcomes of a program to upgrade the nursing faculty in Cambodia: A qualitative study.柬埔寨护理师资提升计划的中期成果:一项定性研究。
Nurse Educ Today. 2022 Sep;116:105438. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2022.105438. Epub 2022 Jun 14.
2
Application of digital education in undergraduate nursing and medical interns during the COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic review.新冠疫情期间数字教育在本科护理和医学实习生中的应用:系统评价。
Nurse Educ Today. 2022 Jan;108:105183. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2021.105183. Epub 2021 Oct 25.
3
E-learning in health professions education during the COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic review.
COVID-19 大流行期间的卫生专业教育中的电子学习:系统评价。
J Educ Eval Health Prof. 2021;18:27. doi: 10.3352/jeehp.2021.18.27. Epub 2021 Oct 29.
4
Assessment of nursing students' competence in clinical practice: A systematic review of reviews.评估护理学生临床实践能力:系统评价综述。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2019 Dec;100:103414. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2019.103414. Epub 2019 Aug 31.
5
Regulation of nursing professionals in Cambodia and Vietnam: a review of the evolution and key influences.柬埔寨和越南护理专业人员的监管:演变和主要影响的回顾。
Hum Resour Health. 2019 Jul 3;17(1):48. doi: 10.1186/s12960-019-0388-y.
6
What is a theory-practice gap? An exploration of the concept.理论与实践差距是什么?对这一概念的探讨。
Nurse Educ Pract. 2019 Jan;34:1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.nepr.2018.10.005. Epub 2018 Oct 13.
7
Experiences of undergraduate nursing students in peer assisted learning in clinical practice: a qualitative systematic review.本科护理专业学生在临床实践中参与同伴辅助学习的经历:一项质性系统评价
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2018 May;16(5):1190-1219. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-003295.
8
Development of a context specific accreditation assessment tool for affirming quality midwifery education in Bangladesh.开发一种针对特定背景的认证评估工具,以确认孟加拉国助产士教育的质量。
Midwifery. 2018 Jun;61:74-80. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2018.02.021. Epub 2018 Feb 21.
9
The effectiveness of clinical education models for undergraduate nursing programs: A systematic review.本科护理专业临床教育模式的有效性:一项系统综述。
Nurse Educ Pract. 2018 Mar;29:116-126. doi: 10.1016/j.nepr.2017.12.006. Epub 2017 Dec 16.
10
Process-oriented evaluation of an international faculty development program for Asian developing countries: a qualitative study.面向过程的亚洲发展中国家国际师资发展项目评价:一项定性研究。
BMC Med Educ. 2017 Dec 21;17(1):260. doi: 10.1186/s12909-017-1101-2.