• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

SARS-CoV-2 病毒基因组检测外部质量评估轮次的结果,重点关注检测方法的灵敏度和样本混合。

Results of a SARS-CoV-2 virus genome detection external quality assessment round focusing on sensitivity of assays and pooling of samples.

机构信息

Austrian Association for Quality Assurance and Standardization of Medical and Diagnostic Tests (ÖQUASTA), Vienna, Austria.

Center for Virology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.

出版信息

Clin Chem Lab Med. 2022 May 23;60(8):1308-1312. doi: 10.1515/cclm-2022-0263. Print 2022 Jul 26.

DOI:10.1515/cclm-2022-0263
PMID:35599330
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Results of earlier external quality assessment (EQA) rounds suggested remarkable differences in the sensitivity of SARS-CoV PCR assays. Although the test systems are intended to detect SARS-CoV-2 in individual samples, screening is often applied to sample pools to increase efficiency and decrease costs. However, it is unknown to what extent these tests actually meet the manufacturer's specifications for sensitivity and how they perform when testing sample pools.

METHODS

The sensitivity of assays in routine use was evaluated with a panel of positive samples in a round of a SARS-CoV-2 virus genome detection EQA scheme. The panel consisted of samples at or near the lower limit of detection ("weakly positive"). Laboratories that routinely test sample pools were asked to also analyze the pooled EQA samples according to their usual pool size and dilution method.

RESULTS

All participants could detect a highly positive patient-derived sample (>10 copies/mL). Most (96%) of the test systems could detect at least 1,000 copies/mL, meeting the minimum acceptable benchmark, and many (94%) detected the vRNA in a sample with lower concentration (500 copies/mL). The false negative ratio increased to 16 and 26% for samples with 100 and 50 copies/mL, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The performance of most assays met or exceeded their specification on sensitivity. If assays are to be used to analyze sample pools, the sensitivity of the assay and the number of pooled samples must be balanced.

摘要

目的

早期的外部质量评估(EQA)结果表明,SARS-CoV PCR 检测方法的灵敏度存在显著差异。尽管这些检测系统旨在检测个体样本中的 SARS-CoV-2,但通常会对样本池进行筛查,以提高效率并降低成本。然而,尚不清楚这些测试在多大程度上实际符合制造商规定的灵敏度要求,以及它们在测试样本池时的性能如何。

方法

在 SARS-CoV-2 病毒基因组检测 EQA 方案的一轮中,使用一组阳性样本评估常规使用的检测方法的灵敏度。该样本组由接近检测下限的弱阳性样本组成。要求常规测试样本池的实验室按照其通常的样本池大小和稀释方法分析 EQA 样本池。

结果

所有参与者均能检测到高度阳性的患者来源样本(>10 拷贝/mL)。大多数(96%)检测系统可检测至少 1000 拷贝/mL,符合可接受的最低基准,许多(94%)可检测出浓度较低(500 拷贝/mL)的样本中的 vRNA。对于 100 拷贝/mL 和 50 拷贝/mL 的样本,假阴性率分别增加到 16%和 26%。

结论

大多数检测方法的性能符合或超过其灵敏度规格。如果要使用检测方法分析样本池,则必须平衡检测方法的灵敏度和样本池的数量。

相似文献

1
Results of a SARS-CoV-2 virus genome detection external quality assessment round focusing on sensitivity of assays and pooling of samples.SARS-CoV-2 病毒基因组检测外部质量评估轮次的结果,重点关注检测方法的灵敏度和样本混合。
Clin Chem Lab Med. 2022 May 23;60(8):1308-1312. doi: 10.1515/cclm-2022-0263. Print 2022 Jul 26.
2
Performance of SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acid amplification testing in Austria as measured by external quality assessment schemes during 3 years of the COVID-19 pandemic: an observational retrospective study.在 COVID-19 大流行的 3 年期间,通过外部质量评估计划测量奥地利的 SARS-CoV-2 核酸扩增检测性能:一项观察性回顾性研究。
Lancet Microbe. 2023 Dec;4(12):e1015-e1023. doi: 10.1016/S2666-5247(23)00286-0. Epub 2023 Nov 15.
3
External quality assessments for SARS-CoV-2 genome detection in Austria : A comparison of the first postpandemic round with results from the pandemic era.奥地利针对 SARS-CoV-2 基因组检测的外部质量评估:与大流行时期结果的比较。
Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2024 Aug;136(15-16):429-438. doi: 10.1007/s00508-024-02353-1. Epub 2024 Apr 23.
4
The versatility of external quality assessment for the surveillance of laboratory and diagnostic performance: SARS-CoV-2 viral genome detection in Austria.外部质量评估在实验室和诊断性能监测中的多功能性:奥地利的 SARS-CoV-2 病毒基因组检测。
Clin Chem Lab Med. 2021 Jun 30;59(10):1735-1744. doi: 10.1515/cclm-2021-0604. Print 2021 Sep 27.
5
Evaluation of sample pooling for screening of SARS CoV-2.用于 SARS-CoV-2 筛查的样本混合评估。
PLoS One. 2021 Feb 26;16(2):e0247767. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0247767. eCollection 2021.
6
External Quality Assessment for Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 RNA Detection in Chongqing, China.中国重庆严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒 2 型 RNA 检测的外部质量评估。
Clin Lab. 2022 Jan 1;68(1). doi: 10.7754/Clin.Lab.2021.210517.
7
Validation of SARS-CoV-2 pooled testing for surveillance using the Panther Fusion® system: Impact of pool size, automation, and assay chemistry.使用 Panther Fusion® 系统对 SARS-CoV-2 进行混合检测的验证:池大小、自动化和检测化学的影响。
PLoS One. 2022 Nov 7;17(11):e0276729. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0276729. eCollection 2022.
8
Performance evaluation of SARS-CoV-2 antigen detection in the post-pandemic era: multi-laboratory assessment.后疫情时代 SARS-CoV-2 抗原检测的性能评估:多实验室评估。
Clin Chem Lab Med. 2023 Jun 29;61(12):2237-2247. doi: 10.1515/cclm-2023-0597. Print 2023 Nov 27.
9
Could pooled samples method affect SARS-CoV-2 diagnosis accuracy using BGI and Sansure-Biotech RT-PCR kits used in Gabon, Central Africa? pooled samples 方法是否会影响使用 BGI 和 Sansure-Biotech RT-PCR 试剂盒在中非加蓬进行的 SARS-CoV-2 诊断准确性?
PLoS One. 2022 Jan 21;17(1):e0262733. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0262733. eCollection 2022.
10
Flexible upscaling of laboratory PCR testing capacity at the Robert Koch Institute during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic.在 SARS-CoV-2 大流行期间,罗伯特·科赫研究所的实验室聚合酶链反应检测能力的灵活扩展。
Virol J. 2023 Jul 5;20(1):139. doi: 10.1186/s12985-023-02088-x.

引用本文的文献

1
Behind the scenes of EQA - characteristics, capabilities, benefits and assets of external quality assessment (EQA).EQA的幕后故事——外部质量评估(EQA)的特点、能力、益处及优势
Clin Chem Lab Med. 2025 Jan 6;63(5):898-915. doi: 10.1515/cclm-2024-1293. Print 2025 Apr 28.
2
Virus sequencing performance during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic: a retrospective analysis of data from multiple rounds of external quality assessment in Austria.新冠疫情期间的病毒测序表现:奥地利多轮外部质量评估数据的回顾性分析
Front Mol Biosci. 2024 Feb 5;11:1327699. doi: 10.3389/fmolb.2024.1327699. eCollection 2024.
3
Ignoring SARS-CoV-2 testing performance during COVID-19.
在新冠疫情期间忽视严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)检测表现。
Lancet Microbe. 2023 May;4(5):e296. doi: 10.1016/S2666-5247(23)00030-7. Epub 2023 Feb 3.
4
Converting to an international unit system improves harmonization of results for SARS-CoV-2 quantification: Results from multiple external quality assessments.转换为国际单位制可提高 SARS-CoV-2 定量检测结果的协调性:来自多个外部质量评估的结果。
J Clin Virol. 2023 Jan;158:105352. doi: 10.1016/j.jcv.2022.105352. Epub 2022 Dec 10.