Suppr超能文献

2016年斯德哥尔摩急诊牙科治疗中抗生素的使用情况:一项横断面研究

Antibiotic utilization in emergency dental care in Stockholm 2016: a cross sectional study.

作者信息

Khalil Dalia, Baranto Gabriel, Lund Bodil, Hultin Margareta

机构信息

Department of Dentistry, King Fahad General Hospital, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.

Division of Periodontology, Department of Dental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Huddinge, Sweden.

出版信息

Acta Odontol Scand. 2022 Oct;80(7):547-553. doi: 10.1080/00016357.2022.2049864. Epub 2022 May 21.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To investigate systemic antibiotics utilization in emergency dental care and to determine the most common treatment measures performed during emergency visits in public versus private emergency care in Sweden.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Two questionnaires were answered by dentists at one large public and one large private emergency dental clinic in Stockholm, Sweden. The first questionnaire pertained to the emergency care provided to patients ( = 1023) and the second concerned the dentists' ( = 13) own knowledge and attitudes towards antibiotic treatment and oral infections. The results of the questionnaires were tested using a Chi-square test.

RESULTS

Sixteen percent of all patients seeking emergency dental treatment received antibiotics. The most common overall reason for visiting an emergency clinic was pain (52%,  = 519). The most common diagnoses made by the participating dentists in the public clinic were tooth/filling fracture (17%,  = 91) and gingivitis (14%,  = 76), while in the private clinic they were tooth fracture (29%,  = 146) and symptomatic apical periodontitis (15%,  = 72). Although the number of patients with infection was higher in the public care clinic, there was no significant difference in total number of antibiotic prescriptions between the two clinics. The rate of patients receiving antibiotic prescription as sole treatment was 41% ( = 34) in private care and 31% ( = 18) in public care. Thirty-one percent ( = 4) of dentists prescribed antibiotics for patients with diagnoses normally not requiring antibiotics, citing reasons such as time limitation, patient request, patient travel, patient safety, and follow-up not possible.

CONCLUSION

Although antibiotic prescription frequency among the Swedish emergency care dentists participating in this study was low, areas for improvement could include providing education to improve dentists' knowledge on both antibiotic prescription in emergency dental care and treatment of acute oral infections.

摘要

目的

调查瑞典急诊牙科治疗中全身用抗生素的使用情况,并确定在瑞典公共与私人急诊护理的急诊就诊期间最常见的治疗措施。

材料与方法

瑞典斯德哥尔摩一家大型公共和一家大型私人急诊牙科诊所的牙医回答了两份问卷。第一份问卷涉及为患者(n = 1023)提供的急诊护理,第二份问卷涉及牙医(n = 13)自身对抗生素治疗和口腔感染的知识及态度。问卷结果采用卡方检验进行分析。

结果

所有寻求急诊牙科治疗的患者中,16%接受了抗生素治疗。前往急诊诊所最常见的总体原因是疼痛(52%,n = 519)。参与调查的公共诊所牙医最常见的诊断是牙齿/补牙材料折断(17%,n = 91)和牙龈炎(14%,n = 76),而私人诊所中最常见的诊断是牙齿折断(29%,n = 146)和症状性根尖周炎(15%,n = 72)。虽然公共护理诊所中感染患者的数量较多,但两家诊所之间抗生素处方总数没有显著差异。在私人护理中,仅接受抗生素处方治疗的患者比例为41%(n = 34),在公共护理中为31%(n = 18)。31%(n = 4)的牙医为通常不需要使用抗生素的诊断患者开具抗生素,理由包括时间限制、患者要求、患者出行、患者安全以及无法进行随访等。

结论

尽管参与本研究的瑞典急诊护理牙医中抗生素处方频率较低,但仍有改进空间,包括开展教育以提高牙医在急诊牙科护理中抗生素处方及急性口腔感染治疗方面的知识。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验