Suppr超能文献

疫苗与包涵体。

Vaccine and inclusion.

作者信息

Nganmeni Zéphirin, Pongou Roland, Tchantcho Bertrand, Tondji Jean-Baptiste

机构信息

UFR AES - Economics and Management, Dionysian Economics Laboratory (L.E.D.) Université Paris 8 Saint-Denis France.

Department of Economics University of Ottawa Ottawa Ontario Canada.

出版信息

J Public Econ Theory. 2022 Apr 27. doi: 10.1111/jpet.12590.

Abstract

In majoritarian democracies, popular policies may not be inclusive, and inclusive policies may not be popular. This dilemma raises the crucial question of when it is possible to design a policy that is both inclusive and popular. We address this question in the context of vaccine allocation in a polarized economy facing a pandemic. In such an economy, individuals are organized around distinct networks and groups and have in-group preferences. We provide a complete characterization of the set of inclusive and popular vaccine allocations. The findings imply that the number of vaccine doses necessary to generate an inclusive and popular vaccine allocation is greater than the one necessary to obtain an allocation that is only popular. The analysis further reveals that it is always possible to design the decision-making rule of the economy to implement an inclusive and popular vaccine allocation. Under such a rule, the composition of any group endowed with the veto power should necessarily reflect the diversity of the society.

摘要

在多数主义民主国家,受欢迎的政策可能不具有包容性,而具有包容性的政策可能不受欢迎。这一困境提出了一个关键问题,即何时有可能设计出一项既具有包容性又受欢迎的政策。我们在面临大流行病的两极分化经济中的疫苗分配背景下解决这个问题。在这样的经济中,个人围绕不同的网络和群体组织起来,并具有群体内偏好。我们对包容性和受欢迎的疫苗分配集进行了完整的刻画。研究结果表明,产生包容性和受欢迎的疫苗分配所需的疫苗剂量数量大于获得仅受欢迎的分配所需的剂量数量。分析进一步表明,总是有可能设计经济的决策规则以实施包容性和受欢迎的疫苗分配。在这样的规则下,任何拥有否决权的群体的组成必然应反映社会的多样性。

相似文献

1
Vaccine and inclusion.疫苗与包涵体。
J Public Econ Theory. 2022 Apr 27. doi: 10.1111/jpet.12590.
7
Veto player theory and reform making in Western Europe.否决权参与者理论与西欧的改革制定
Eur J Polit Res. 2018 May;57(2):282-307. doi: 10.1111/1475-6765.12226. Epub 2017 Jul 26.

本文引用的文献

1
Optimal interventions in networks during a pandemic.大流行期间网络中的最佳干预措施。
J Popul Econ. 2023;36(2):847-883. doi: 10.1007/s00148-022-00916-y. Epub 2022 Aug 13.
6
Understanding COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy.理解对新冠疫苗的犹豫态度。
Nat Med. 2021 Aug;27(8):1338-1339. doi: 10.1038/s41591-021-01459-7.
7
A Net Benefit Approach for the Optimal Allocation of a COVID-19 Vaccine.一种 COVID-19 疫苗最优分配的净收益方法。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2021 Sep;39(9):1059-1073. doi: 10.1007/s40273-021-01037-2. Epub 2021 Jun 17.
9
The ethics of COVID-19 vaccine distribution.新冠疫苗分配的伦理问题。
J Public Health Policy. 2021 Sep;42(3):514-517. doi: 10.1057/s41271-021-00291-0. Epub 2021 May 19.
10
Vaccine hesitancy in the era of COVID-19.新冠疫情时期的疫苗犹豫
Public Health. 2021 May;194:245-251. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2021.02.025. Epub 2021 Mar 4.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验