Al-Tamimi Saleh Adel G A, Leavey Gerard
Foxfield, USA.
Corelaine, Northern Ireland.
J Child Adolesc Trauma. 2021 Jun 25;15(2):441-450. doi: 10.1007/s40653-021-00373-x. eCollection 2022 Jun.
Where low- and middle-income countries have limited economic resources to provide individualized mental health services to people exposed to conflict, community-based interventions may be more appropriate. We aimed to evaluate community level interventions for improving mental health outcomes in Low- and Middle-income countries (LMIC). A realist review of community-based interventions (CBIs) to improve mental health for people in LMIC following conflict. Five databases (Cochrane, PubMed, PsychINFO, Medline, and CINAHL) and a manual search of individual papers. We found 1318 articles, of which 29 were selected. Out of the 29 primary articles, 19 showed successful results, 4 showed mixed results, 1 showed inconclusive results, and 1 showed unsuccessful results. After analyzing the results, we found 3 mechanisms that may influence the effectiveness of these CBIs: the use of lay community members as intervention deliverers, the application of transdiagnostic approaches, and customized outcome assessment tools. Community-based approaches to improve mental health in LMICs are rare and evidence for their effectiveness is limited. Interventions that have a wide scope, train lay mental health workers, and use contextually adapted outcome assessment tools show promise.
在低收入和中等收入国家,经济资源有限,难以向遭受冲突影响的人群提供个性化心理健康服务,基于社区的干预措施可能更为合适。我们旨在评估低收入和中等收入国家(LMIC)中改善心理健康结果的社区层面干预措施。对低收入和中等收入国家冲突后改善心理健康的基于社区的干预措施(CBI)进行了实证性综述。检索了五个数据库(Cochrane、PubMed、PsychINFO、Medline和CINAHL)并手动检索了单篇论文。我们共找到1318篇文章,其中29篇被选中。在这29篇主要文章中,19篇显示出成功的结果,4篇显示出混合结果,1篇显示结果不确定,1篇显示不成功的结果。在分析结果后,我们发现了3种可能影响这些基于社区的干预措施有效性的机制:使用非专业社区成员作为干预实施者、应用跨诊断方法以及定制的结果评估工具。在低收入和中等收入国家,基于社区改善心理健康的方法很少见,其有效性的证据也有限。范围广泛、培训非专业心理健康工作者并使用根据具体情况调整的结果评估工具的干预措施显示出前景。