• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

动态血糖监测仪与糖化血红蛋白之间的关联:一项回顾性前后分析。

Association between Flash Glucose Monitors and A1C: A Retrospective Pre-Post Analysis.

作者信息

Tekarli Mustafa, Turner Kyle, Witt Daniel

机构信息

University of Utah College of Pharmacy.

Department of Pharmacotherapy, University of Utah College of Pharmacy.

出版信息

Innov Pharm. 2021 Jun 10;12(3). doi: 10.24926/iip.v12i3.3977. eCollection 2021.

DOI:10.24926/iip.v12i3.3977
PMID:35601570
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9119995/
Abstract

Randomized controlled trials have investigated the effect of continuous glucose monitors on hemoglobin A1C; however, more evidence is needed to justify their use and expand insurance coverage. Additionally, there are few published studies investigating the A1C lowering effect of flash glucose monitors (FGMs) in broad diabetes populations with varying insulin requirements. This analysis aimed to help fill this gap in medical literature and help clinicians evaluate costs/benefits when considering FGMs for their patients with diabetes. To determine the association between FGM use and A1C reduction in patients with type 1 or type 2 diabetes mellitus regardless of insulin dependence. Pharmacy dispensing records were used to identify patients for inclusion. Patients who received a FGM from a University of Utah pharmacy between July 7, 2018 and July 7, 2020 were included. Patients who did not receive at least an 84-day supply of FGM sensors or did not have a baseline or follow-up A1C were excluded. Baseline and follow-up A1Cs, defined as A1Cs that are within one year before and 3-12 months after the FGM dispense date, were collected for each patient. New diabetes medications within a six-month window of the initial FGM dispense date were also recorded. Outcome variables were collected before and after patients received their first FGM (pre-FGM vs. post-FGM, respectively). The primary outcome was the difference between baseline and follow-up A1C for each patient. Secondary outcomes were the difference in baseline and follow-up A1C for various clinical subgroups within the overall sample. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize baseline characteristics and outcome data. Paired Student's t-tests were used to evaluate outcome differences (α=0.05). Fifty-seven patients (50.8% male; mean age: 49 years) were included. For the primary outcome, the average baseline and follow-up A1Cs were 9.33% and 8.32%, respectively for a difference of -1.01% ([95%CI -1.31:-0.72]; p<0.0001). The use of FGMs is associated with decreases in A1C within a cohort of patients at one health system. Further effort to determine impact of FGM on clinical and economic outcomes is warranted.

摘要

随机对照试验研究了持续血糖监测仪对糖化血红蛋白(A1C)的影响;然而,仍需要更多证据来证明其使用的合理性并扩大保险覆盖范围。此外,很少有已发表的研究调查闪光血糖监测仪(FGM)在胰岛素需求各异的广大糖尿病患者群体中降低A1C的效果。本分析旨在填补医学文献中的这一空白,并帮助临床医生在考虑为糖尿病患者使用FGM时评估成本/效益。以确定1型或2型糖尿病患者(无论是否依赖胰岛素)使用FGM与A1C降低之间的关联。利用药房配药记录来确定纳入的患者。纳入2018年7月7日至2020年7月7日期间从犹他大学药房领取FGM的患者。未领取至少84天用量的FGM传感器或没有基线或随访A1C的患者被排除。为每位患者收集基线和随访A1C,定义为FGM配药日期前一年内和配药后3至12个月内的A1C。还记录了初始FGM配药日期后六个月内的新糖尿病药物。在患者接受首次FGM之前和之后(分别为FGM前和FGM后)收集结果变量。主要结局是每位患者基线和随访A1C之间的差异。次要结局是总体样本中各个临床亚组基线和随访A1C的差异。使用描述性统计来总结基线特征和结果数据。采用配对学生t检验来评估结果差异(α=0.05)。纳入了57名患者(男性占50.8%;平均年龄:49岁)。对于主要结局,平均基线和随访A1C分别为9.33%和8.32%,差异为-1.01%([95%置信区间-1.31:-0.72];p<0.0001)。在一个医疗系统的患者队列中,使用FGM与A1C降低相关。有必要进一步努力确定FGM对临床和经济结局的影响。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b80d/9119995/510a4e886e21/21550417-12-3977-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b80d/9119995/60890577a75f/21550417-12-3977-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b80d/9119995/21e0ee411f11/21550417-12-3977-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b80d/9119995/510a4e886e21/21550417-12-3977-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b80d/9119995/60890577a75f/21550417-12-3977-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b80d/9119995/21e0ee411f11/21550417-12-3977-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b80d/9119995/510a4e886e21/21550417-12-3977-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Association between Flash Glucose Monitors and A1C: A Retrospective Pre-Post Analysis.动态血糖监测仪与糖化血红蛋白之间的关联:一项回顾性前后分析。
Innov Pharm. 2021 Jun 10;12(3). doi: 10.24926/iip.v12i3.3977. eCollection 2021.
2
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
3
Demographic and Clinical Profiles of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Patients Initiating Canagliflozin Versus DPP-4 Inhibitors in a Large U.S. Managed Care Population.在一个大型美国管理式医疗人群中,起始用卡格列净与 DPP-4 抑制剂治疗的 2 型糖尿病患者的人口统计学和临床特征。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2015 Dec;21(12):1204-12. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2015.21.12.1204.
4
Persistence with Basal-Bolus Insulin Therapy in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and Effect on Clinical and Economic Outcomes: A Retrospective Claims Database Study.2 型糖尿病患者坚持基础-餐时胰岛素治疗对临床和经济结局的影响:一项回顾性理赔数据库研究。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2019 Dec;25(12):1420-1431. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2019.19097. Epub 2019 Sep 24.
5
Impact of a clinical pharmacy program on changes in hemoglobin A1c, diabetes-related hospitalizations, and diabetes-related emergency department visits for patients with diabetes in an underserved population.在服务不足人群中,临床药学项目对糖尿病患者的糖化血红蛋白变化、糖尿病相关住院和糖尿病相关急诊就诊的影响。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2014 Sep;20(9):914-9. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2014.20.9.914.
6
Time in range-A1c hemoglobin relationship in continuous glucose monitoring of type 1 diabetes: a real-world study.1 型糖尿病连续血糖监测的时间范围内 A1c 血红蛋白关系:一项真实世界研究。
BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care. 2021 Jan;9(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjdrc-2019-001045.
7
Two-year use of flash glucose monitoring is associated with sustained improvement of glycemic control and quality of life (FLARE-NL-6).两年的瞬感葡萄糖监测与持续改善血糖控制和生活质量相关(FLARE-NL-6)。
BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care. 2021 Sep;9(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjdrc-2021-002124.
8
Relationship between glycemic control and diabetes-related hospital costs in patients with type 1 or type 2 diabetes mellitus.1型或2型糖尿病患者血糖控制与糖尿病相关住院费用之间的关系。
J Manag Care Pharm. 2010 May;16(4):264-75. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2010.16.4.264.
9
Real-Time Flash Glucose Monitoring Had Better Effects on Daily Glycemic Control Compared With Retrospective Flash Glucose Monitoring in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes on Premix Insulin Therapy.实时动态血糖监测在接受预混胰岛素治疗的 2 型糖尿病患者中的日常血糖控制方面优于回顾性动态血糖监测。
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2022 Feb 10;13:832102. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2022.832102. eCollection 2022.
10
Flash Glucose Monitoring Accepted in Daily Life of Children and Adolescents with Type 1 Diabetes and Reduction of Severe Hypoglycemia in Real-Life Use.实时血糖监测在 1 型糖尿病患儿和青少年日常生活中的应用得到认可,并降低了严重低血糖的发生率。
Diabetes Technol Ther. 2019 Jun;21(6):329-335. doi: 10.1089/dia.2018.0339. Epub 2019 May 6.

本文引用的文献

1
Effect of the FreeStyle Libre™ flash glucose monitoring system on glycemic control in individuals with type 2 diabetes treated with basal-bolus insulin therapy: An open label, prospective, multicenter trial in Japan.《利舒坦瞬感血糖仪系统对接受基础-餐时胰岛素治疗的 2 型糖尿病患者血糖控制效果的影响:一项日本开放性、前瞻性、多中心试验》
J Diabetes Investig. 2021 Jan;12(1):82-90. doi: 10.1111/jdi.13327. Epub 2020 Sep 9.
2
Flash glucose monitoring helps achieve better glycemic control than conventional self-monitoring of blood glucose in non-insulin-treated type 2 diabetes: a randomized controlled trial.在非胰岛素治疗的2型糖尿病患者中,动态血糖监测比传统的自我血糖监测更有助于实现更好的血糖控制:一项随机对照试验。
BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care. 2020 Jun;8(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjdrc-2019-001115.
3
Improved well-being and decreased disease burden after 1-year use of flash glucose monitoring (FLARE-NL4).使用瞬态血糖监测仪(FLARE-NL4)一年后,患者的幸福感提高,疾病负担减轻。
BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care. 2019 Dec 9;7(1):e000809. doi: 10.1136/bmjdrc-2019-000809. eCollection 2019.
4
Use of professional-mode flash glucose monitoring, at 3-month intervals, in adults with type 2 diabetes in general practice (GP-OSMOTIC): a pragmatic, open-label, 12-month, randomised controlled trial.在一般实践中(GP-OSMOTIC),每 3 个月使用专业模式的即时血糖监测,对 2 型糖尿病成人进行监测:一项实用、开放标签、12 个月、随机对照试验。
Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2020 Jan;8(1):17-26. doi: 10.1016/S2213-8587(19)30385-7.
5
Continuous Glucose Monitoring Versus Self-monitoring of Blood Glucose in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Systematic Review with Meta-analysis.2型糖尿病患者的持续血糖监测与自我血糖监测:一项Meta分析的系统评价
Cureus. 2019 Sep 12;11(9):e5634. doi: 10.7759/cureus.5634.
6
Freestyle libre flash glucose monitoring improves patient quality of life measures in children with Type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) with appropriate provision of education and support by healthcare professionals.在医疗保健专业人员提供适当教育和支持的情况下,Freestyle Libre 闪式葡萄糖监测可改善 1 型糖尿病(T1DM)患儿的生活质量指标。
Diabetes Metab Syndr. 2019 Sep-Oct;13(5):2923-2926. doi: 10.1016/j.dsx.2019.07.054. Epub 2019 Jul 30.
7
The Potential Impact of the FreeStyle Libre Flash Glucose Monitoring System on Mental Well-Being and Treatment Satisfaction in Patients with Type 1 Diabetes: A Prospective Study.FreeStyle Libre 闪光血糖监测系统对 1 型糖尿病患者心理健康和治疗满意度的潜在影响:一项前瞻性研究。
Diabetes Ther. 2019 Aug;10(4):1239-1248. doi: 10.1007/s13300-019-0616-4. Epub 2019 May 7.
8
Effect of Flash Glucose Monitoring Technology on Glycemic Control and Treatment Satisfaction in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes.实时动态血糖监测技术对 2 型糖尿病患者血糖控制及治疗满意度的影响。
Diabetes Care. 2019 Jul;42(7):1178-1184. doi: 10.2337/dc18-0166. Epub 2019 Apr 29.
9
The new FreeStyle libre flash glucose monitoring system improves the glycaemic control in a cohort of people with type 1 diabetes followed in real-life conditions over a period of one year.新型的FreeStyle libre动态葡萄糖监测系统在为期一年的实际跟踪中,改善了1型糖尿病患者群体的血糖控制情况。
Endocrinol Diabetes Metab. 2018 Jun 17;1(3):e00023. doi: 10.1002/edm2.23. eCollection 2018 Jul.
10
9. Pharmacologic Approaches to Glycemic Treatment: .9. 血糖治疗的药物学方法: 。
Diabetes Care. 2019 Jan;42(Suppl 1):S90-S102. doi: 10.2337/dc19-S009.