Suppr超能文献

中美受试者在自行进行的无水经验味觉测试中的比较。

Comparison of Chinese and American subjects on the self-administered Waterless Empirical Taste Test.

作者信息

Chen Jingguo, Ren Xiaoyong, Yan Huanhuan, Zhao Bingjie, Chen Jingyan, Zhu Kang, Lyu Hui, Li Zhihui, Doty Richard L

机构信息

Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery Second Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University (Xibei Hospital) Xi'an China.

School of Stomatology Xi'an Medical University Xi'an China.

出版信息

J Sens Stud. 2022 Mar 26:e12745. doi: 10.1111/joss.12745.

Abstract

Cultural differences have been reported between the taste sensitivity of persons of Asian and European ancestry, although findings have been mixed. This study sought to determine whether American and Chinese adults perform differently on a novel taste test that requires no water, can be self-administered, and employs a representative of umami as one of its tastants. This 53-trial test was administered to 113 Chinese and 214 Americans. The subjects orally sampled monomer cellulose pads containing one of four dried concentrations of sucrose, citric acid, NaCl, caffeine, and monosodium glutamate and indicated whether a sweet, sour, bitter, salty, brothy, or no taste sensation was perceived. Separate gender by culture analyses of covariance with age as the covariate were performed on the total score and the scores of each taste stimulus. For all taste qualities, women outperformed men and test scores declined with age. No difference between American and Chinese subjects was found for the total taste score ( = .129) or for the sucrose ( = .129) or NaCl ( = .368) scores. However, for monosodium glutamate, the scores were 28.40% higher for the Chinese than for the American subjects ( = .024), and for citric acid and caffeine, the scores were 24.12 and 21.79% higher for the American subjects ('s = .001 and .029). The basis for these differences is unclear, although both anatomical (e.g., differences in density or distribution of taste buds) and cultural factors may be involved. Future work is needed to determine the cause of these largely novel findings and whether they generalize to other Chinese and American samples. In this study, a practical self-administered quantitative taste test that requires no water was found to be sensitive to quality-specific differences in test scores between Chinese and American subjects, as well as to age and gender. The Chinese subjects outperformed the American subjects in correctly identifying the quality of monosodium glutamate (umami), whereas the American subjects outperformed Chinese subjects in correctly identifying the bitter and sour qualities of caffeine and citric acid, respectively. Experiential factors related to culture-specific cuisines may explain some of these differences. This research indicates that a relatively rapid taste test, which can be sent through the mail and which requires no test administrator or source of water, can be used in cross-cultural studies to elucidate individual differences in taste perception.

摘要

据报道,亚洲和欧洲血统人群的味觉敏感度存在文化差异,不过研究结果并不一致。本研究旨在确定美国和中国成年人在一项新型味觉测试中的表现是否存在差异,该测试无需用水,可自行操作,且将一种鲜味剂作为味觉刺激物之一。这项包含53次试验的测试对113名中国人和214名美国人进行。受试者通过口腔品尝含有四种不同干燥浓度蔗糖、柠檬酸、氯化钠、咖啡因和味精的单体纤维素垫,并指出是否感觉到甜、酸、苦、咸、鲜味或无味。以年龄作为协变量,对总分以及每种味觉刺激的得分进行了按文化和性别的协方差分析。对于所有味觉特性,女性表现优于男性,且测试分数随年龄下降。美国和中国受试者在总味觉分数(P = 0.129)、蔗糖分数(P = 0.129)或氯化钠分数(P = 0.368)上未发现差异。然而,对于味精,中国受试者的分数比美国受试者高28.40%(P = 0.024);对于柠檬酸和咖啡因,美国受试者的分数分别比中国受试者高24.12%和21.79%(P值分别为0.001和0.029)。这些差异的原因尚不清楚,不过解剖学因素(如味蕾密度或分布的差异)和文化因素可能都有涉及。需要进一步的研究来确定这些全新发现的原因,以及它们是否适用于其他中国和美国样本。在本研究中,一种无需用水的实用自行操作定量味觉测试被发现对中国和美国受试者在测试分数上的质量特异性差异以及年龄和性别敏感。中国受试者在正确识别味精(鲜味)的质量方面表现优于美国受试者,而美国受试者在正确识别咖啡因的苦味和柠檬酸的酸味方面分别优于中国受试者。与特定文化菜肴相关的经验因素可能解释了其中一些差异。这项研究表明,一种相对快速的味觉测试,可通过邮件发送,无需测试管理员或水源,可用于跨文化研究以阐明味觉感知的个体差异。

相似文献

3

本文引用的文献

3
Validation of the Waterless Empirical Taste Test (WETT).无水经验味觉测试(WETT)的验证。
Behav Res Methods. 2021 Apr;53(2):864-873. doi: 10.3758/s13428-020-01463-8.
4
Epidemiology of smell and taste dysfunction.嗅觉和味觉功能障碍的流行病学
Handb Clin Neurol. 2019;164:3-13. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-444-63855-7.00001-0.
5
9
Taste loss in the elderly: Possible implications for dietary habits.老年人味觉丧失:对饮食习惯的可能影响。
Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 2017 Nov 22;57(17):3684-3689. doi: 10.1080/10408398.2016.1160208.
10
Cross-cultural validation of a taste test with paper strips.纸条味觉测试的跨文化验证
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2016 Oct;273(10):3407-11. doi: 10.1007/s00405-016-4037-y. Epub 2016 Apr 12.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验