• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

多重列表学习中穿插检索练习对初始学习材料的影响。

The Effects of Interspersed Retrieval Practice in Multiple-List Learning on Initially Studied Material.

作者信息

Kliegl Oliver, Kriechbaum Verena M, Bäuml Karl-Heinz T

机构信息

Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2022 May 6;13:889622. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.889622. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.889622
PMID:35602709
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9121996/
Abstract

The forward testing effect (FTE) refers to the finding that retrieval practice of previously studied material can facilitate retention of newly studied material more than does restudy of the material. The goal of the present study was to examine how such retrieval practice affects initially studied, unpracticed material. To this end, we used two commonly applied versions of the FTE task, consisting of either three (Experiment 1) or five (Experiment 2) study lists. While study of list 1 was always followed by an unrelated distractor activity, study of list 2 (3-list version) or lists 2, 3, and 4 (5-list version) was followed by either interim restudy or retrieval practice of the immediately preceding list. After studying all lists, participants were either asked to recall the first or last study list. Results showed that, for both the three-list and five-list versions, interim retrieval practice led to a typical FTE, irrespective of whether unrelated or categorized study lists were used. Going beyond the prior work, interim retrieval practice was found to have no effect on initially studied, unpracticed material, regardless of the type of study material. The findings suggest that using interim retrieval practice as a study method can improve recall of the last studied list without incurring a cost for the initially studied material. Our results are difficult to align with the view that retrieval practice induces context change, but are consistent with the idea that retrieval practice can lead participants to employ superior encoding strategies.

摘要

前向测试效应(FTE)指的是这样一个发现:对先前学习材料的检索练习比重新学习该材料更能促进对新学习材料的记忆保持。本研究的目的是考察这种检索练习如何影响最初学习的、未进行练习的材料。为此,我们使用了两种常用版本的FTE任务,分别由三个(实验1)或五个(实验列表2(三列表版本)或列表2、3和4(五列表版本)的学习之后,要么是对前一个列表进行临时重新学习,要么是进行检索练习。在学习完所有列表后,要求参与者回忆第一个或最后一个学习列表。结果表明,对于三列表和五列表版本,临时检索练习都会导致典型的FTE,无论使用的是不相关的还是分类的学习列表。与之前的研究不同,临时检索练习被发现对最初学习的、未进行练习的材料没有影响,无论学习材料的类型如何。研究结果表明,将临时检索练习作为一种学习方法可以提高对最后学习列表的回忆,而不会对最初学习的材料造成损失。我们的结果很难与检索练习会引起情境变化的观点相一致,但与检索练习可以引导参与者采用更好的编码策略的观点一致。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4fde/9121996/43d3d3dd106f/fpsyg-13-889622-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4fde/9121996/8f1aba6c2889/fpsyg-13-889622-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4fde/9121996/43d3d3dd106f/fpsyg-13-889622-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4fde/9121996/8f1aba6c2889/fpsyg-13-889622-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4fde/9121996/43d3d3dd106f/fpsyg-13-889622-g0002.jpg

相似文献

1
The Effects of Interspersed Retrieval Practice in Multiple-List Learning on Initially Studied Material.多重列表学习中穿插检索练习对初始学习材料的影响。
Front Psychol. 2022 May 6;13:889622. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.889622. eCollection 2022.
2
How retrieval practice and semantic generation affect subsequently studied material: an analysis of item-level effects.检索练习和语义生成如何影响后续学习的材料:项目层面效应分析。
Memory. 2023 Jan;31(1):127-136. doi: 10.1080/09658211.2022.2127770. Epub 2022 Sep 25.
3
Retrieval Practice Enhances New Learning but does Not Affect Performance in Subsequent Arithmetic Tasks.检索练习可增强新的学习效果,但不影响后续算术任务的表现。
J Cogn. 2022 Mar 22;5(1):22. doi: 10.5334/joc.216. eCollection 2022.
4
The Forward Effect of Testing: Behavioral Evidence for the Reset-of-Encoding Hypothesis Using Serial Position Analysis.测试的前向效应:使用系列位置分析对编码重置假设的行为证据
Front Psychol. 2018 Jul 11;9:1197. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01197. eCollection 2018.
5
The Forward Testing Effect is Immune to Acute Psychosocial Encoding/Retrieval Stress.前瞻测试效应不受急性心理社会编码/检索应激的影响。
Exp Psychol. 2020 Mar;67(2):112-122. doi: 10.1027/1618-3169/a000472.
6
The Forward Testing Effect is Reliable and Independent of Learners' Working Memory Capacity.前测效应是可靠的,且与学习者的工作记忆容量无关。
J Cogn. 2019 Aug 29;2(1):37. doi: 10.5334/joc.82.
7
Retrieval Practice Fails to Insulate Episodic Memories against Interference after Stroke.检索练习无法使中风后的情景记忆免受干扰。
Front Psychol. 2017 Jun 28;8:1074. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01074. eCollection 2017.
8
Retrieval practice can eliminate list method directed forgetting.检索练习可以消除列表法指导下的遗忘。
Mem Cognit. 2016 Jan;44(1):15-23. doi: 10.3758/s13421-015-0539-x.
9
Testing enhances subsequent learning in older adults.测试可增强老年人的后续学习能力。
Psychol Aging. 2019 Mar;34(2):242-250. doi: 10.1037/pag0000307. Epub 2018 Oct 18.
10
Retrieval practice can insulate items against intralist interference: Evidence from the list-length effect, output interference, and retrieval-induced forgetting.检索练习可以使项目免受列表内干扰:来自列表长度效应、输出干扰和检索诱发遗忘的证据。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2016 Feb;42(2):202-14. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000172. Epub 2015 Aug 24.

本文引用的文献

1
Testing potential mechanisms underlying test-potentiated new learning.测试潜在的机制,这些机制是测试增强新学习的基础。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2022 Aug;48(8):1127-1143. doi: 10.1037/xlm0001021. Epub 2021 Jul 22.
2
Do working memory capacity and test anxiety modulate the beneficial effects of testing on new learning?工作记忆容量和考试焦虑是否调节了测试对新学习的有益影响?
J Exp Psychol Appl. 2020 Dec;26(4):724-738. doi: 10.1037/xap0000278. Epub 2020 Jun 4.
3
Enhancing learning and retrieval of new information: a review of the forward testing effect.
增强新信息的学习与检索:正向测试效应综述
NPJ Sci Learn. 2018 Apr 11;3:8. doi: 10.1038/s41539-018-0024-y. eCollection 2018.
4
Testing enhances subsequent learning in older adults.测试可增强老年人的后续学习能力。
Psychol Aging. 2019 Mar;34(2):242-250. doi: 10.1037/pag0000307. Epub 2018 Oct 18.
5
Retrieval potentiates new learning: A theoretical and meta-analytic review.检索促进新学习:理论与元分析综述。
Psychol Bull. 2018 Nov;144(11):1111-1146. doi: 10.1037/bul0000166. Epub 2018 Sep 27.
6
The Forward Effect of Testing: Behavioral Evidence for the Reset-of-Encoding Hypothesis Using Serial Position Analysis.测试的前向效应:使用系列位置分析对编码重置假设的行为证据
Front Psychol. 2018 Jul 11;9:1197. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01197. eCollection 2018.
7
Reduced interference from memory testing: A postretrieval monitoring account.记忆测试干扰减少:一种检索后监测解释
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2017 Jul;43(7):1063-1072. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000377. Epub 2017 Jan 23.
8
Testing enhances subsequent learning in older but not in younger elementary school children.测试能促进大龄小学生的后续学习,但对低龄小学生却无此效果。
Dev Sci. 2016 Nov;19(6):992-998. doi: 10.1111/desc.12340. Epub 2015 Nov 27.
9
Studying on borrowed time: How does testing impair new learning?在借来的时间里学习:测试如何损害新的学习?
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2015 Nov;41(6):1741-54. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000126. Epub 2015 May 4.
10
The effect of testing versus restudy on retention: a meta-analytic review of the testing effect.测试与重测对保持效果的影响:测试效应的元分析综述。
Psychol Bull. 2014 Nov;140(6):1432-63. doi: 10.1037/a0037559. Epub 2014 Aug 25.