Junior researcher at the School of Medicine and Health Sciences, 25807Universidad del Rosario, Bogotá, Colombia.
PhD Student, Department of Paediatrics, Obstetrics & Gynaecology and Preventative Medicine, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Spain.
J Health Serv Res Policy. 2022 Oct;27(4):261-268. doi: 10.1177/13558196221094676. Epub 2022 May 22.
To analyse the contribution of participatory action research (PAR) in designing and implementing joint training sessions as a means to improve clinical coordination in a public health care network in Bogotá, Colombia.
A qualitative, descriptive-interpretative study using semi-structured individual interviews and focus groups with 40 professionals (GPs, specialists, members of the local steering committee (LSC) and network middle managers) involved in designing and implementing joint training sessions to improve cross-level clinical coordination. The intervention consisted of two forms of joint training sessions for GPs and specialists, implemented through two PAR cycles.
The PAR approach in designing and implementing joint training sessions led to greater awareness of clinical coordination problems and helped adapting sessions to the local health care context. Study participants highlighted the role of LSC leadership during the PAR process and the importance of ensuring the necessary resources for adopting the intervention. Limited institutional support and differences between joint training sessions affected doctors' participation and reduced the time available to conduct the sessions. The use of a reflexive method was essential in enhancing doctors' participation, along with session duration, the facilitator's role and session content.
The study provides evidence regarding the contribution of a PAR process to designing and implementing joint training sessions for improving clinical coordination. The findings can inform similar approaches in other health systems.
分析参与式行动研究(PAR)在设计和实施联合培训课程中的作用,以改善哥伦比亚波哥大公共医疗保健网络中的临床协调。
采用定性、描述性-解释性研究方法,对参与设计和实施联合培训课程以改善跨层次临床协调的 40 名专业人员(全科医生、专家、地方指导委员会(LSC)成员和网络中层管理人员)进行半结构化个人访谈和焦点小组访谈。干预措施包括两种针对全科医生和专家的联合培训课程形式,通过两个 PAR 周期实施。
PAR 方法在设计和实施联合培训课程中,提高了对临床协调问题的认识,并有助于根据当地医疗保健环境调整课程。研究参与者强调了 LSC 领导在 PAR 过程中的作用,以及为采用干预措施确保必要资源的重要性。机构支持有限以及联合培训课程之间的差异影响了医生的参与,减少了开展课程的时间。使用反思方法对于增强医生的参与至关重要,同时还需要考虑课程持续时间、协调员的角色和课程内容。
该研究提供了关于 PAR 过程在设计和实施联合培训课程以改善临床协调方面的作用的证据。研究结果可以为其他卫生系统提供类似方法的参考。