School of Health and Related-Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield City, UK.
Faculty of Applied Medical Sciences, Jazan University, Jazan City, Saudi Arabia.
Age Ageing. 2022 May 1;51(5). doi: 10.1093/ageing/afac108.
There is increasing recognition of the importance of prehospital trauma care for older patients, but little systematic research to guide practice. We aimed to review the published evidence on prehospital trauma care for older patients, determine the scope of existing research and identify research gaps in the literature.
We undertook a systematic scoping review guided by the Arksey and O'Malley framework and reported in line with the PRISMA-ScR checklist. A systematic search was conducted of Scopus, CINAHL, MEDLINE, PubMed and Cochrane library databases to identify articles published between 2001 and 2021. Study selection criteria were applied independently by two reviewers. Data were extracted, charted and summarised from eligible articles. A data-charting form was then developed to facilitate thematic analysis. Narrative synthesis then involved identifying major themes and subthemes from the data.
We identified and reviewed 65 studies, and included 25. We identified five categories: 'field triage', 'ageing impacts', 'decision-making', 'paramedic' awareness' and 'paramedic's behaviour'. Undertriage and overtriage (sensitivity and specificity) were commonly cited as poorly investigated field-triage subthemes. Ageing-related physiologic changes, comorbidities and polypharmacy were the most widely researched. Inaccurate decision-making and poor early identification of major injuries were identified as potentially influencing patient outcomes.
This is the first study reviewing the published evidence on prehospital trauma care for older patients and identifying research priorities for future research. Field-triage tools, paramedics' knowledge about injuries in the older population, and understanding of paramedics' negative behaviours towards older patients were identified as key research priorities.
人们越来越认识到老年患者院前创伤护理的重要性,但很少有系统的研究来指导实践。我们旨在回顾发表的关于老年患者院前创伤护理的证据,确定现有研究的范围,并确定文献中的研究空白。
我们根据 Arksey 和 O'Malley 框架进行了系统的范围审查,并按照 PRISMA-ScR 清单进行了报告。我们对 Scopus、CINAHL、MEDLINE、PubMed 和 Cochrane 图书馆数据库进行了系统搜索,以确定 2001 年至 2021 年期间发表的文章。两名评审员独立应用研究选择标准。从合格文章中提取、图表和总结数据。然后制定了数据图表表格,以方便主题分析。叙述性综合分析涉及从数据中识别主要主题和子主题。
我们确定并审查了 65 项研究,其中包括 25 项。我们确定了五个类别:“现场分诊”、“老龄化影响”、“决策”、“护理人员意识”和“护理人员行为”。分诊不足和分诊过度(敏感性和特异性)被普遍认为是研究不足的现场分诊子主题。与衰老相关的生理变化、合并症和多药治疗是研究最多的。不准确的决策和对重大伤害的早期识别不足被认为可能影响患者的预后。
这是第一项审查发表的关于老年患者院前创伤护理证据的研究,并确定了未来研究的优先研究领域。现场分诊工具、护理人员对老年人群体中伤害的了解以及对护理人员对老年患者的负面行为的理解被确定为关键的研究重点。