Service SAMU-Urgences, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Édouard Herriot, Hospices Civils de Lyon, 69123 Lyon, France.
Centre de Recherche, CHU de Québec-Université Laval, Québec, QC G1J 1Z4, Canada.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Jan 20;20(3):1975. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20031975.
: Prehospital trauma triage tools are not tailored to identify severely injured older adults. Our trauma triage protocol based on a three-tier trauma severity grading system (A, B, and C) has never been studied in this population. The objective was to assess its accuracy in predicting in-hospital mortality among older adults (≥65 years) and to compare it to younger patients. : A retrospective multicenter cohort study, from 2011 to 2021. Consecutive adult trauma patients managed by a mobile medical team were prospectively graded A, B, or C according to the initial seriousness of their injuries. Accuracy was evaluated using sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, and positive and negative likelihood ratios. : 8888 patients were included (14.1% were ≥65 years). Overall, 10.1% were labeled Grade A (15.2% vs. 9.3% among older and younger adults, respectively), 21.9% Grade B (27.9% vs. 20.9%), and 68.0% Grade C (56.9% vs. 69.8%). In-hospital mortality was 7.1% and was significantly higher among older adults regardless of severity grade. Grade A showed lower sensitivity (50.5 (43.7; 57.2) vs. 74.6 (69.8; 79.1), < 0.0001) for predicting mortality among older adults compared to their younger counterparts. Similarly, Grade B was associated with lower sensitivity (89.5 (84.7; 93.3) vs. 97.2 (94.8; 98.60), = 0.0003) and specificity (69.4 (66.3; 72.4) vs. 74.6 (73.6; 75.7], = 0.001) among older adults. : Our prehospital trauma triage protocol offers high sensitivity for predicting in-hospital mortality including older adults.
: 院前创伤分诊工具并不适合识别严重受伤的老年人。我们的创伤分诊方案基于一个三级创伤严重程度分级系统(A、B 和 C),从未在该人群中进行过研究。目的是评估其在预测老年人(≥65 岁)住院死亡率方面的准确性,并将其与年轻患者进行比较。: 这是一项回顾性多中心队列研究,时间范围为 2011 年至 2021 年。连续的成年创伤患者由移动医疗团队进行前瞻性分级 A、B 或 C,根据其初始损伤严重程度进行分级。使用敏感性、特异性、阳性和阴性预测值以及阳性和阴性似然比来评估准确性。: 共纳入 8888 例患者(14.1%≥65 岁)。总体而言,10.1%为 A 级(老年人和年轻人中分别为 15.2%和 9.3%),21.9%为 B 级(27.9%和 20.9%),68.0%为 C 级(56.9%和 69.8%)。住院死亡率为 7.1%,无论严重程度等级如何,老年人的死亡率均显著更高。A 级对老年人死亡率的预测敏感性较低(50.5(43.7;57.2)与 74.6(69.8;79.1),<0.0001),与年轻患者相比。同样,B 级的敏感性也较低(89.5(84.7;93.3)与 97.2(94.8;98.60),=0.0003)和特异性(69.4(66.3;72.4)与 74.6(73.6;75.7],=0.001)。: 我们的院前创伤分诊方案对预测包括老年人在内的住院死亡率具有较高的敏感性。