Cull John, Riggs Robert, Riggs Sara, Byham Megan, Witherspoon Morgan, Baugh Nathan, Metcalf Ashley, Kitchens Debra, Manning Benjamin
Am Surg. 2019 May 1;85(5):524-529.
Determining triage activation levels in geriatric patients who fall (GF), and patients with penetrating wounds can be difficult and inaccurate, resulting in excessive overtriage (OT) and undertriage (UT) rates. We developed trauma activation prediction models using field data to predict with greater accuracy trauma activation level and triage rates consistent with the ACS recommendations. Using data from the 2014 National Trauma Data Bank, we created binary regression equations for each type of injury (GF and penetrating wounds). The 2014 data were randomized and divided into two halves. The first half for each injury type was used to generate prediction models, whereas the second half of the 2014 data were combined with 2013 and 2015 National Trauma Data Bank data for model verification. Binary regression equations were generated from vital signs collected by EMS. A Cribari grid with ISS ≥ 15 was used to determine the appropriateness of activation level. Chi-square analysis was used to determine significant differences between OT, UT, and accuracy predictions. Using our triage models, we were able to obtain UT rates of less than 4 per cent for GF with OT rates of less than 40 per cent, UT rates less than 4.1 per cent and OT of less than 50 per cent for patients with gunshot wounds, and UT rates less than 4 per cent and OT rates less than 25 per cent for patients who had stab wounds. Our developed trauma level prediction models enable health providers to predict trauma activation levels that can result in OT and UT rates in the recommended ranges by the ACS.
确定老年跌倒患者(GF)以及穿透伤患者的分诊激活水平可能困难且不准确,从而导致过度分诊(OT)和分诊不足(UT)率过高。我们利用现场数据开发了创伤激活预测模型,以更准确地预测与美国外科医师学会(ACS)建议一致的创伤激活水平和分诊率。利用2014年国家创伤数据库的数据,我们针对每种损伤类型(GF和穿透伤)创建了二元回归方程。2014年的数据被随机分为两半。每种损伤类型的前一半数据用于生成预测模型,而2014年数据的后一半则与2013年和2015年国家创伤数据库的数据相结合用于模型验证。二元回归方程是根据急救医疗服务(EMS)收集的生命体征生成的。使用损伤严重度评分(ISS)≥15的克里巴里网格来确定激活水平的适宜性。卡方分析用于确定OT、UT和准确性预测之间的显著差异。使用我们的分诊模型,对于GF患者,我们能够获得低于4%的UT率,OT率低于40%;对于枪伤患者,UT率低于4.1%,OT率低于50%;对于刺伤患者,UT率低于4%,OT率低于25%。我们开发的创伤水平预测模型使医疗服务提供者能够预测创伤激活水平,从而使OT和UT率处于ACS建议的范围内。