Department of Pancreatic Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, No. 37, Guoxue Alley, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan Province, China.
College of Medicine, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu, 610000, Sichuan Province, China.
Int J Surg. 2022 Jul;103:106686. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2022.106686. Epub 2022 May 20.
Spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy is widely used to remove benign or low-grade malignant neoplasms located in the pancreatic body and tail. Both splenic vessels preserving (SVP-DP) and splenic vessels ligating (Warshaw technique [WT]) distal pancreatectomy are safe and effective methods but which technique is superior remains controversial. Thus, this study aimed to evaluate the clinical outcomes of patients who underwent both methods.
Major databases, including PubMed, Embase, Science Citation Index Expanded, and The Cochrane Library, were searched for studies comparing SVP-DP and the WT for spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy up to December 2021. The perioperative and postoperative outcomes were compared between the SVP-DP and WT groups. Pooled odds ratios (ORs) and weighted mean differences (WMDs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using fixed- or random-effects models.
Twenty retrospective studies with 2173 patients were analyzed. A total of 1467 (67.5%) patients underwent SVP-DP, while 706 (32.5%) patients underwent WT. Patients in the SVP-DP group had a significantly lower rate of splenic infarction (OR: 0.17; 95% CI, 0.11-0.25; P < 0.00001) and incidence of gastric varices (OR: 0.19; 95% CI, 0.11-0.32; P < 0.00001) compared to the patients in the WT group; furthermore, they had a shorter length of hospital stay (WMD: 0.71; 95% CI, -1.13 to -0.29; P = 0.0008). There were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of major complication, postoperative pancreatic fistula (B/C), reoperation, blood loss, or operation time.
Compared to WT, SVP-DP should be preferred to reduce splenic infarction and gastric varices, and WT may be more suitable for large tumors. Moreover, considering the shortcomings of retrospective study, a multicenter randomized controlled study with a large sample size should be conducted to verify our results.
保留脾脏的胰体尾切除术广泛应用于切除位于胰体和胰尾的良性或低度恶性肿瘤。保留脾脏血管(SVP-DP)和结扎脾脏血管(Warshaw 技术 [WT])的胰体尾切除术都是安全有效的方法,但哪种方法更优越仍存在争议。因此,本研究旨在评估接受这两种方法的患者的临床结果。
主要数据库,包括 PubMed、Embase、Science Citation Index Expanded 和 The Cochrane Library,对截至 2021 年 12 月比较 SVP-DP 和 WT 用于保留脾脏的胰体尾切除术的研究进行了检索。比较 SVP-DP 组和 WT 组的围手术期和术后结果。使用固定或随机效应模型计算合并比值比(ORs)和加权均数差(WMDs)及 95%置信区间(CIs)。
共分析了 20 项回顾性研究的 2173 例患者。其中,1467 例(67.5%)患者行 SVP-DP,706 例(32.5%)患者行 WT。SVP-DP 组的脾梗死发生率(OR:0.17;95%CI,0.11-0.25;P<0.00001)和胃静脉曲张发生率(OR:0.19;95%CI,0.11-0.32;P<0.00001)显著低于 WT 组;此外,SVP-DP 组的住院时间更短(WMD:0.71;95%CI,-1.13 至 -0.29;P=0.0008)。两组在主要并发症、术后胰瘘(B/C)、再次手术、出血量或手术时间方面无显著差异。
与 WT 相比,SVP-DP 可降低脾梗死和胃静脉曲张的发生率,而 WT 可能更适合于较大的肿瘤。此外,考虑到回顾性研究的局限性,应进行一项多中心、大样本量的随机对照研究来验证我们的结果。