Suppr超能文献

保留脾脏的远端胰腺切除术(保脾、保动脉、牺牲静脉)随访经验教训。

Lessons learned from follow up of spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy with artery saving and vein sacrificing.

作者信息

Chun Jin Ha, Park Sung Eun, Hong Tae Ho

机构信息

Division of Hepato-biliary and Pancreas Surgery, Department of Surgery, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

Gland Surg. 2024 Jun 30;13(6):833-843. doi: 10.21037/gs-24-55. Epub 2024 Jun 27.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The Warshaw method as a technique for spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy (SPDP) carries the risk of splenic infarction following splenic artery ligation. This study introduces a modified Warshaw method, which preserves the splenic artery while sacrificing the splenic vein, and compares its outcomes with the traditional Warshaw method.

METHODS

According to the bleeding status during vessel dissection, either the Warshaw method (group W) or the modified Warshaw method (group MW) was used. Guided by preoperative imaging, we utilized the planned modified Warshaw method (group PMW) when the splenic vein was embedded in the pancreatic parenchyma.

RESULTS

Group MW demonstrated a lower incidence of splenic infarction and engorged gastric collaterals than group W (6.3% 69.8%, P<0.001; 25.0% 55.8%, P=0.003, respectively). There were no significant differences in perioperative changes of splenic volume between the two groups. Group PMW experienced less estimated blood loss than group W (71.9±59.13 357.9±447.72 cc, P=0.006).

CONCLUSIONS

The planned modified Warshaw method is an efficient and safe technique, resulting in lower estimated blood loss and favorable outcomes concerning splenic infarction and gastric collaterals than the Warshaw method without inducing congestive splenomegaly.

摘要

背景

Warshaw法作为一种保留脾脏的远端胰腺切除术(SPDP)技术,在结扎脾动脉后存在脾梗死风险。本研究介绍了一种改良的Warshaw法,该方法保留脾动脉同时牺牲脾静脉,并将其结果与传统Warshaw法进行比较。

方法

根据血管解剖过程中的出血情况,采用Warshaw法(W组)或改良Warshaw法(MW组)。在术前影像学引导下,当脾静脉包埋于胰腺实质内时,采用计划改良Warshaw法(PMW组)。

结果

MW组脾梗死和胃侧支充血的发生率低于W组(分别为6.3%对69.8%,P<0.001;25.0%对55.8%,P=0.003)。两组间脾体积的围手术期变化无显著差异。PMW组的估计失血量少于W组(71.9±59.13对357.9±447.72 cc,P=0.006)。

结论

计划改良Warshaw法是一种有效且安全的技术,与Warshaw法相比,其估计失血量更低,在脾梗死和胃侧支方面有良好的结果,且不会导致脾肿大。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1b69/11247568/d066e7872f1e/gs-13-06-833-f1.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验