• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

中国美容皮肤科医生共同决策中的障碍与激励因素:一项横断面研究的结果

Barriers and Stimulus in Shared Decision Making Among Aesthetic Dermatologists in China: Findings from a Cross-Sectional Study.

作者信息

Fan Jing, Li Shiyuan, Qiang Yan, Duan Zhen, Wu Albert, Wang Ruiping

机构信息

Clinical Research Center, Shanghai Skin Diseases Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.

Bloomberg School of Public Health, University of Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, MD, USA.

出版信息

Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol. 2024 May 20;17:1153-1164. doi: 10.2147/CCID.S457802. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.2147/CCID.S457802
PMID:38800355
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11119500/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Shared decision making (SDM) is a collaborative process involving both healthcare providers and patients in making medical decisions, which gains increasing prominence in healthcare practice. But evidence on the level of SDM in medical practice and barriers as well as stimulus during the SDM implementation among aesthetic dermatologists is limited in China.

METHODS

From July to August 2023, 1938 dermatologists were recruited online in China. Data were collected through an electronic questionnaire covering: (1) demographic features; (2) SDM questionnaire physician version (SDM-Q-Doc); and (3) stimulus and barriers in SDM implementation. Logistic regression was applied to explore factors associated with SDM practice, barriers, and stimulus of SDM implementation, respectively.

RESULTS

The 1938 dermatologists included 1329 females (68.6%), with an average age of 35 years. The total SDM score ranged from 0 to 45, with a median value of 40 (IQR: 35-44), and the median stimulus score and barriers scores were 28 (IQR: 24-32) and 19 (IQR: 13-26), respectively. The prevalence of good SDM was 27.2%, logistic regression indicated that female dermatologists (odds ratio, OR=1.21, 95% confidence interval, CI: 0.96-1.51), and dermatologists with more years of aesthetic practice had a higher proportion of good SDM practice (OR was 1.44 for 5-9 years, 1.58 for 10-15 years and 1.77 for over 15 years). Moreover, female dermatologists and dermatologists with higher education level and serviced in private settings had lower barrier scores; female dermatologists and dermatologists with more years of aesthetic practice had higher stimulus scores.

CONCLUSION

Chinese aesthetic dermatologists appear to implement SDM at an active level, with more stimulus and less barriers in SDM implementation. The integration of SDM into clinical practice among dermatologists is beneficial both for patients and dermatologists. Moreover, SDM practice should be strongly promoted and enhanced during medical aesthetics, especially among male dermatologists, dermatologists with less working experience, and those who work at public institutions.

摘要

引言

共同决策(SDM)是一个医疗服务提供者和患者共同参与医疗决策的协作过程,在医疗实践中日益受到重视。但在中国,关于美容皮肤科医生医疗实践中的共同决策水平、实施过程中的障碍以及促进因素的证据有限。

方法

2023年7月至8月,在中国在线招募了1938名皮肤科医生。通过电子问卷收集数据,内容包括:(1)人口统计学特征;(2)共同决策问卷医生版(SDM-Q-Doc);(3)共同决策实施过程中的促进因素和障碍。分别应用逻辑回归分析探索与共同决策实践、共同决策实施的障碍及促进因素相关的因素。

结果

1938名皮肤科医生中,女性1329名(68.6%),平均年龄35岁。共同决策总分范围为0至45分,中位数为40分(四分位间距:35 - 44),促进因素得分中位数和障碍得分中位数分别为28分(四分位间距:24 - 32)和19分(四分位间距:13 - 26)。良好共同决策的患病率为27.2%,逻辑回归分析表明,女性皮肤科医生(比值比,OR = 1.21,95%置信区间,CI:0.96 - 1.51)以及美容实践年限更长的皮肤科医生具有良好共同决策实践的比例更高(5 - 9年的OR为1.44,10 - 15年的OR为1.58,超过15年的OR为1.77)。此外,女性皮肤科医生、受教育程度较高且在私立机构工作的皮肤科医生障碍得分较低;女性皮肤科医生以及美容实践年限更长的皮肤科医生促进因素得分较高。

结论

中国美容皮肤科医生似乎在积极实施共同决策,在共同决策实施过程中促进因素较多而障碍较少。将共同决策融入皮肤科医生的临床实践对患者和皮肤科医生都有益。此外,在医学美容过程中应大力推广和加强共同决策实践,尤其是在男性皮肤科医生、工作经验较少的皮肤科医生以及在公共机构工作的皮肤科医生中。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6b14/11119500/8ae445b9e897/CCID-17-1153-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6b14/11119500/7adb53342568/CCID-17-1153-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6b14/11119500/bff08316b24c/CCID-17-1153-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6b14/11119500/8ae445b9e897/CCID-17-1153-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6b14/11119500/7adb53342568/CCID-17-1153-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6b14/11119500/bff08316b24c/CCID-17-1153-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6b14/11119500/8ae445b9e897/CCID-17-1153-g0003.jpg

相似文献

1
Barriers and Stimulus in Shared Decision Making Among Aesthetic Dermatologists in China: Findings from a Cross-Sectional Study.中国美容皮肤科医生共同决策中的障碍与激励因素:一项横断面研究的结果
Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol. 2024 May 20;17:1153-1164. doi: 10.2147/CCID.S457802. eCollection 2024.
2
Shared decision-making implementation status among dermatologists engaging in medical esthetics: a cross-sectional study in China.从事医学美容的皮肤科医生共同决策的实施现状:一项中国的横断面研究。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2024 Jul 31;11:1418917. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1418917. eCollection 2024.
3
Shared decision-making in the treatment of adolescents diagnosed with depression: A cross-sectional survey of mental health professionals in China.中国青少年抑郁症治疗中的共享决策:精神卫生专业人员的横断面调查。
J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2024 Jun;31(3):340-351. doi: 10.1111/jpm.12990. Epub 2023 Oct 26.
4
Effects of online continuing medical education on perspectives of shared decision-making among Chinese endocrinologists.在线继续医学教育对中国内分泌科医生共同决策观念的影响。
BMC Med Educ. 2023 Nov 17;23(1):878. doi: 10.1186/s12909-023-04838-5.
5
The current extent of and need for shared decision making in atopic dermatitis and psoriasis in the Netherlands: an online survey study amongst patients and physicians.荷兰特应性皮炎和银屑病患者与医生共同决策的现状及需求:一项在线调查研究
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2020 Nov;34(11):2574-2583. doi: 10.1111/jdv.16340. Epub 2020 Jul 27.
6
[Physicians' awareness and assessment of shared decision making in oncology practice.].[医生对肿瘤学实践中共同决策的认识与评估。]
Rev Esp Salud Publica. 2019 Oct 9;93:e201910066.
7
Facilitators and barriers to implementing shared decision making: A cross-sectional study of physicians in Japan.实施共同决策的促进因素和障碍:日本医生的横断面研究。
Patient Educ Couns. 2022 Jul;105(7):2546-2556. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2022.01.016. Epub 2022 Jan 31.
8
Validation of SDM-Q-Doc Questionnaire to measure shared decision-making physician's perspective in oncology practice.验证 SDM-Q-Doc 问卷以衡量肿瘤学实践中医生的共享决策观点。
Clin Transl Oncol. 2017 Nov;19(11):1312-1319. doi: 10.1007/s12094-017-1671-9. Epub 2017 May 11.
9
Continuing professional education of Iranian healthcare professionals in shared decision-making: lessons learned.伊朗医疗保健专业人员在共同决策方面的继续职业教育:经验教训
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Mar 12;21(1):225. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-06233-6.
10
Shared Decision-Making, Therapeutic Choice, and Decisional Regret in Patients With Alopecia Areata.斑秃患者的共同决策、治疗选择和决策后悔。
JAMA Dermatol. 2022 Oct 1;158(10):1187-1191. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2022.3025.

本文引用的文献

1
Shared decision-making in health care.医疗保健中的共同决策。
J Family Med Prim Care. 2023 Aug;12(8):1737. doi: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_2304_22. Epub 2023 Aug 29.
2
Factors influencing shared decision-making in long-term care facilities.影响长期护理机构中共同决策的因素。
BMC Geriatr. 2023 Sep 19;23(1):577. doi: 10.1186/s12877-023-04301-6.
3
Correlation analysis between physicians' evaluations of doctor-patient relationship and their preferences for shared decision-making in China.中国医生对医患关系的评价与其对共同决策的偏好之间的相关性分析。
Front Psychiatry. 2022 Oct 5;13:946383. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.946383. eCollection 2022.
4
Patients' and physicians' gender and perspective on shared decision-making: A cross-sectional study from Dubai.患者和医生的性别以及对共同决策的看法:来自迪拜的一项横断面研究。
PLoS One. 2022 Sep 1;17(9):e0270700. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0270700. eCollection 2022.
5
Physician Preferences and Shared-Decision Making for the Traditional Chinese Medicine Treatment of Lung Cancer: A Discrete-Choice Experiment Study in China.中医师对肺癌中医治疗的偏好及共同决策:一项中国的离散选择实验研究
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2022 Jun 17;16:1487-1497. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S365109. eCollection 2022.
6
Shared decision-making in Canada: Update on integration of evidence in health decisions and patient-centred care government mandates.加拿大的共同决策:健康决策中证据整合和以患者为中心的政府指令更新
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2022 Jun;171:22-29. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2022.04.006. Epub 2022 May 21.
7
Shared decision making and remote consulting.共同决策与远程咨询。
BMJ Mil Health. 2023 Jun;169(3):290. doi: 10.1136/bmjmilitary-2022-002096. Epub 2022 Mar 15.
8
Facilitators and barriers to implementing shared decision making: A cross-sectional study of physicians in Japan.实施共同决策的促进因素和障碍:日本医生的横断面研究。
Patient Educ Couns. 2022 Jul;105(7):2546-2556. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2022.01.016. Epub 2022 Jan 31.
9
Barriers and facilitators to shared decision-making in hospitals from policy to practice: a systematic review.医院中从政策到实践的共享决策的障碍和促进因素:系统评价。
Implement Sci. 2021 Jul 31;16(1):74. doi: 10.1186/s13012-021-01142-y.
10
Shared decision making, physicians' explanations, and treatment satisfaction: a cross-sectional survey of prostate cancer patients.共同决策、医生的解释与治疗满意度:一项针对前列腺癌患者的横断面调查。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2020 Dec 14;20(1):334. doi: 10.1186/s12911-020-01355-z.