• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

2013 - 2018年阿肯色州遗传性癌症风险基因检测的全州趋势及相关因素

Statewide trends and factors associated with genetic testing for hereditary cancer risk in Arkansas 2013-2018.

作者信息

Acharya Mahip, Zorn Kristin K, Simonson Melinda E, Bimali Milan, Moore Gary W, Peng Cheng, Martin Bradley C

机构信息

Division of Pharmaceutical Evaluation and Policy, Department of Pharmacy Practice, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences College of Pharmacy, Education II Building 6253, 4301 W. Markham Street, slot 522, Little Rock, AR-72205, United States.

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences College of Medicine, Little Rock, AR, United States.

出版信息

Hered Cancer Clin Pract. 2022 May 23;20(1):19. doi: 10.1186/s13053-022-00226-0.

DOI:10.1186/s13053-022-00226-0
PMID:35606835
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9128197/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Early identification of hereditary cancer risk would save lives, but genetic testing (GT) has been inadequate. We assessed i) trends for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer (HBOC), Lynch syndrome, and other GT and ii) factors associated with receipt of GT.

METHODS

We used data from the Arkansas All-Payer Claims Database from January 2013 through June 2018 (commercial, Medicaid), December 2017 (state employee), or December 2016 (Medicare) and identified enrollees with ≥1 month of enrollment. Using Current Procedural Terminology (CPT-4) codes, rates for GT were calculated per 100,000 person-quarters and time series regressions estimated. Second, GT and covariate information for enrollees with 24 months of continuous enrollment were used to estimate separate logistic regression models for each GT category.

RESULTS

Among 2,520,575 unique enrollees, HBOC testing rates were 2.2 (Medicaid), 22.0 (commercial), 40.4 (state employee), and 13.1(Medicare) per 100,000 person-quarters and increased linearly across all plans. Older age (OR=1.24; 95%CI 1.20 - 1.28), female sex (OR=18.91; 95%CI 13.01 - 28.86), higher comorbidity burden (OR=1.08; 95%CI 1.05 - 1.12), mental disorders (OR=1.53; 95%CI 1.15 - 2.00), and state employee coverage (OR=1.65; 95%CI 1.37 - 1.97) were positively associated with HBOC testing. Less than 1 of 10,000 enrollees received Lynch syndrome testing, while < 5 of 10,000 received HBOC testing.

CONCLUSION

GT rates for hereditary cancer syndromes have increased in Arkansas but remain low. Receipt of GT was explained with high discrimination by sex and plan type.

IMPACT

Expansion of GT for hereditary cancer risk in Arkansas is needed to identify high-risk individuals who could benefit from risk-reduction strategies.

摘要

背景

早期识别遗传性癌症风险可挽救生命,但基因检测(GT)一直不足。我们评估了:i)遗传性乳腺癌和卵巢癌(HBOC)、林奇综合征及其他基因检测的趋势,以及ii)与接受基因检测相关的因素。

方法

我们使用了阿肯色州全支付方索赔数据库2013年1月至2018年6月(商业保险、医疗补助)、2017年12月(州政府雇员保险)或2016年12月(医疗保险)的数据,并确定了参保时间≥1个月的登记参保人员。使用现行程序术语(CPT - 4)编码,计算每100,000人季度的基因检测率,并进行时间序列回归估计。其次,对于连续参保24个月的登记参保人员,使用基因检测和协变量信息,为每个基因检测类别估计单独的逻辑回归模型。

结果

在2,520,575名独特的登记参保人员中,HBOC检测率分别为每100,000人季度2.2(医疗补助)、22.0(商业保险)、40.4(州政府雇员)和13.1(医疗保险),且在所有保险计划中呈线性上升。年龄较大(OR = 1.24;95%CI 1.20 - 1.28)、女性(OR = 18.91;95%CI 13.01 - 28.86)、较高的合并症负担(OR = 1.08;95%CI 1.05 - 1.12)、精神障碍(OR = 1.53;95%CI 1.15 - 2.00)以及州政府雇员保险(OR = 1.65;95%CI 1.37 - 1.97)与HBOC检测呈正相关。每10,000名登记参保人员中接受林奇综合征检测的不到1人,而接受HBOC检测的不到5人。

结论

阿肯色州遗传性癌症综合征的基因检测率有所上升,但仍然较低。基因检测的接受情况在性别和保险计划类型方面存在高度差异。

影响

阿肯色州需要扩大遗传性癌症风险的基因检测,以识别可能从降低风险策略中受益的高危个体。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8c51/9128197/7f8e2f152876/13053_2022_226_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8c51/9128197/478271519997/13053_2022_226_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8c51/9128197/7f8e2f152876/13053_2022_226_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8c51/9128197/478271519997/13053_2022_226_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8c51/9128197/7f8e2f152876/13053_2022_226_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Statewide trends and factors associated with genetic testing for hereditary cancer risk in Arkansas 2013-2018.2013 - 2018年阿肯色州遗传性癌症风险基因检测的全州趋势及相关因素
Hered Cancer Clin Pract. 2022 May 23;20(1):19. doi: 10.1186/s13053-022-00226-0.
2
Relatives from Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer and Lynch Syndrome Families Forgoing Genetic Testing: Findings from the Swiss CASCADE Cohort.遗传性乳腺癌和卵巢癌以及林奇综合征家族的亲属放弃基因检测:瑞士级联队列研究结果
J Pers Med. 2022 Oct 19;12(10):1740. doi: 10.3390/jpm12101740.
3
PTEN germline mutations in patients initially tested for other hereditary cancer syndromes: would use of risk assessment tools reduce genetic testing?在最初接受其他遗传性癌症综合征检测的患者中发现的 PTEN 种系突变:使用风险评估工具是否会减少基因检测?
Oncologist. 2013;18(10):1083-90. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2013-0174. Epub 2013 Sep 13.
4
The uptake of presymptomatic genetic testing in hereditary breast-ovarian cancer and Lynch syndrome: a systematic review of the literature and implications for clinical practice.遗传性乳腺癌-卵巢癌和林奇综合征的症状前基因检测应用:文献系统综述及对临床实践的启示
Fam Cancer. 2019 Jan;18(1):127-135. doi: 10.1007/s10689-018-0089-z.
5
Prevalence of Suspected Hereditary Cancer Syndromes and Germline Mutations Among a Diverse Cohort of Probands Reporting a Family History of Prostate Cancer: Toward Informing Cascade Testing for Men.疑似遗传性癌症综合征和种系突变在报告前列腺癌家族史的不同队列中的先证者中的流行率:为男性的级联检测提供信息。
Eur Urol Oncol. 2020 Jun;3(3):291-297. doi: 10.1016/j.euo.2019.06.010. Epub 2019 Jul 3.
6
[Current clinical issues and recent trends in hereditary breast and ovarian cancer in Japan-genetic testing for HBOC and risk-reducing surgery].[日本遗传性乳腺癌和卵巢癌的当前临床问题及近期趋势——HBOC的基因检测与降低风险手术]
Gan To Kagaku Ryoho. 2014 Nov;41(11):1333-9.
7
Prophylactic Oophorectomy: Reducing the U.S. Death Rate from Epithelial Ovarian Cancer. A Continuing Debate.预防性卵巢切除术:降低美国上皮性卵巢癌死亡率。一场持续的争论。
Oncologist. 1996;1(5):326-330.
8
Medicaid coverage and utilization of covered tobacco-cessation treatments: the Arkansas experience.医疗补助计划覆盖范围和覆盖烟草戒断治疗的使用情况:阿肯色州的经验。
Am J Prev Med. 2012 Jun;42(6):588-95. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2012.02.018.
9
Hereditary cancer-associated mutations in women diagnosed with two primary cancers: an opportunity to identify hereditary cancer syndromes after the first cancer diagnosis.被诊断患有两种原发性癌症的女性中的遗传性癌症相关突变:在首次癌症诊断后识别遗传性癌症综合征的契机。
Oncology. 2015;88(4):226-33. doi: 10.1159/000368836. Epub 2014 Dec 11.
10
Baseline knowledge and receptiveness to genetic testing for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer syndromes in Chinese high-risk females.中国高危女性对遗传性乳腺癌和卵巢癌综合征基因检测的基线知识及接受程度。
J Community Genet. 2021 Jul;12(3):431-438. doi: 10.1007/s12687-021-00518-3. Epub 2021 Apr 30.

引用本文的文献

1
Consideration for Multigene Panel Testing Outside of Cancer-Specific Genetic Testing.癌症特异性基因检测之外的多基因检测板检测考量
Oncol Nurs Forum. 2025 Jun 12;52(4):293-301. doi: 10.1188/25.ONF.293-301.

本文引用的文献

1
Cancer genetic testing in marginalized groups during an era of evolving healthcare reform.在医疗改革不断发展的时代,对边缘化群体进行癌症基因检测。
J Cancer Policy. 2021 Jun;28:100275. doi: 10.1016/j.jcpo.2021.100275. Epub 2021 Feb 16.
2
BRCA1/2 Testing in Massachusetts Among Women With Private Insurance or Medicaid, 2011-2015.2011-2015 年马萨诸塞州私人保险或医疗补助女性的 BRCA1/2 检测。
Med Care. 2020 Nov;58(11):963-967. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000001405.
3
Exploring Predictors of Genetic Counseling and Testing for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer: Findings from the 2015 U.S. National Health Interview Survey.
探索遗传性乳腺癌和卵巢癌遗传咨询与检测的预测因素:来自2015年美国国家健康访谈调查的结果。
J Pers Med. 2019 May 10;9(2):26. doi: 10.3390/jpm9020026.
4
Racial/Ethnic Disparities in BRCA Counseling and Testing: a Narrative Review.BRCA 咨询和检测中的种族/民族差异:叙述性评论。
J Racial Ethn Health Disparities. 2019 Jun;6(3):570-583. doi: 10.1007/s40615-018-00556-7. Epub 2019 Apr 8.
5
Trends in BRCA Test Utilization in an Integrated Health System, 2005-2015.BRCA 检测利用趋势在一个综合健康系统中的体现,2005-2015 年。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2019 Aug 1;111(8):795-802. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djz008.
6
Disparities in gynecologic cancer genetics evaluation.妇科癌症遗传学评估中的差异。
Gynecol Oncol. 2019 Apr;153(1):184-191. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2019.01.024. Epub 2019 Jan 31.
7
Genetic Testing Across Young Hispanic and Non-Hispanic White Breast Cancer Survivors: Facilitators, Barriers, and Awareness of the Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act.年轻西班牙裔和非西班牙裔白人乳腺癌幸存者的基因检测:促进因素、障碍及对《基因信息非歧视法案》的认识
Genet Test Mol Biomarkers. 2019 Feb;23(2):75-83. doi: 10.1089/gtmb.2018.0253. Epub 2019 Jan 24.
8
Knowledge, attitudes, and perceived barriers towards genetic testing across three rural Illinois communities.伊利诺伊州三个乡村社区对基因检测的知识、态度及感知到的障碍
J Community Genet. 2019 Jul;10(3):417-423. doi: 10.1007/s12687-019-00407-w. Epub 2019 Jan 23.
9
Insurance Coverage Policies for Pharmacogenomic and Multi-Gene Testing for Cancer.癌症的药物基因组学和多基因检测的保险覆盖政策。
J Pers Med. 2018 May 16;8(2):19. doi: 10.3390/jpm8020019.
10
Genetic Test Availability And Spending: Where Are We Now? Where Are We Going?基因检测的可及性和支出:我们现在在哪里?我们将走向何方?
Health Aff (Millwood). 2018 May;37(5):710-716. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2017.1427.