• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

工作中的启发式思维:来自初级保健的证据。

Heuristic thinking in the workplace: Evidence from primary care.

机构信息

Department of Economics, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer-Sheva, Israel.

出版信息

Health Econ. 2022 Aug;31(8):1713-1729. doi: 10.1002/hec.4534. Epub 2022 May 23.

DOI:10.1002/hec.4534
PMID:35607261
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9540444/
Abstract

We study whether primary care physicians (PCPs) exercise left digit bias with respect to patients' age. Relying on a comprehensive administrative visit level data from a large Israeli HMO, we measure the intensity of patients' medical examination in visits that take place around a decadal birthday-a birthday that ends with zero-within a regression discontinuity framework. We find that in standard settings with clear patient information there is no evidence that PCPs exhibit left digit bias. However, when PCPs meet unfamiliar patients seeking immediate care, they are more likely to use basic diagnostic tests just above the decadal birthday threshold, indicating that under these circumstances, PCPs do use left digit bias.

摘要

我们研究初级保健医生(PCP)在患者年龄方面是否存在左位数字偏差。我们依赖于一家大型以色列 HMO 的全面行政就诊水平数据,在回归不连续性框架内,衡量在以零结尾的十年生日前后进行的就诊中患者医疗检查的强度。我们发现,在有明确患者信息的标准环境下,没有证据表明 PCP 存在左位数字偏差。然而,当 PCP 遇到寻求即时护理的不熟悉患者时,他们更有可能在十年生日阈值以上使用基本诊断测试,这表明在这些情况下,PCP 确实使用了左位数字偏差。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/75ef/9540444/7a9b379f993f/HEC-31-1713-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/75ef/9540444/82edb65eb336/HEC-31-1713-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/75ef/9540444/0147bbb2d9d3/HEC-31-1713-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/75ef/9540444/9a9045f22347/HEC-31-1713-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/75ef/9540444/8cb3756a7d6c/HEC-31-1713-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/75ef/9540444/c46655c8105c/HEC-31-1713-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/75ef/9540444/1136ec7b83fb/HEC-31-1713-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/75ef/9540444/7a9b379f993f/HEC-31-1713-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/75ef/9540444/82edb65eb336/HEC-31-1713-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/75ef/9540444/0147bbb2d9d3/HEC-31-1713-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/75ef/9540444/9a9045f22347/HEC-31-1713-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/75ef/9540444/8cb3756a7d6c/HEC-31-1713-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/75ef/9540444/c46655c8105c/HEC-31-1713-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/75ef/9540444/1136ec7b83fb/HEC-31-1713-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/75ef/9540444/7a9b379f993f/HEC-31-1713-g006.jpg

相似文献

1
Heuristic thinking in the workplace: Evidence from primary care.工作中的启发式思维:来自初级保健的证据。
Health Econ. 2022 Aug;31(8):1713-1729. doi: 10.1002/hec.4534. Epub 2022 May 23.
2
Effect of age-based left-digit bias on stroke diagnosis: Regression discontinuity design.基于年龄的左位数字偏倚对脑卒中诊断的影响:回归间断设计。
Soc Sci Med. 2023 Oct;334:116193. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2023.116193. Epub 2023 Aug 26.
3
Trends and quality of care in outpatient visits to generalist and specialist physicians delivering primary care in the United States, 1997-2010.1997 - 2010年美国提供初级保健服务的全科医生和专科医生门诊的医疗趋势与质量
J Gen Intern Med. 2014 Jun;29(6):947-55. doi: 10.1007/s11606-014-2808-y. Epub 2014 Feb 25.
4
Training Primary Care Physicians to Employ Self-Efficacy-Enhancing Interviewing Techniques: Randomized Controlled Trial of a Standardized Patient Intervention.培训初级保健医生运用增强自我效能的访谈技巧:标准化患者干预的随机对照试验
J Gen Intern Med. 2016 Jul;31(7):716-22. doi: 10.1007/s11606-016-3644-z. Epub 2016 Mar 8.
5
Use of heuristics during the clinical decision process from family care physicians in real conditions.家庭保健医生在实际临床决策过程中使用启发式方法。
J Eval Clin Pract. 2022 Feb;28(1):135-141. doi: 10.1111/jep.13608. Epub 2021 Aug 9.
6
Association of Medical Scribes in Primary Care With Physician Workflow and Patient Experience.初级保健中医师助手与医师工作流程和患者体验的关联。
JAMA Intern Med. 2018 Nov 1;178(11):1467-1472. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.3956.
7
Inviting patients to read their doctors' notes: patients and doctors look ahead: patient and physician surveys.邀请患者阅读医生的记录:患者和医生展望未来:患者和医生调查。
Ann Intern Med. 2011 Dec 20;155(12):811-9. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-155-12-201112200-00003.
8
Lack of Communication about Medical Marijuana Use between Doctors and Their Patients.医生与患者之间缺乏关于医用大麻使用的沟通。
J Am Board Fam Med. 2018 Sep-Oct;31(5):805-808. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2018.05.170462.
9
Changing trends in osteoporosis care from specialty to primary care physicians.从专科医生到初级保健医生的骨质疏松症治疗趋势变化。
Curr Med Res Opin. 2013 Aug;29(8):881-8. doi: 10.1185/03007995.2013.809335. Epub 2013 Jun 14.
10
Use of hospitalists and office-based primary care physicians' productivity.医院医生的使用情况及基层医疗医生的门诊工作效率。
J Gen Intern Med. 2015 May;30(5):572-81. doi: 10.1007/s11606-014-3007-6.

引用本文的文献

1
The combined effect of patient classification systems and availability of resources can bias the judgments of treatment effectiveness.患者分类系统和资源可用性的综合影响可能会使治疗效果的判断产生偏差。
Sci Rep. 2025 May 7;15(1):15915. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-01043-w.

本文引用的文献

1
Selection with Variation in Diagnostic Skill: Evidence from Radiologists.诊断技能存在差异情况下的选择:来自放射科医生的证据。
Q J Econ. 2022 Jan 21;137(2):729-783. doi: 10.1093/qje/qjab048. eCollection 2022 May.
2
IDENTIFYING SOURCES OF INEFFICIENCY IN HEALTHCARE.识别医疗保健中的低效根源。
Q J Econ. 2020 May;135(2):785-843. doi: 10.1093/qje/qjz040. Epub 2020 Jan 7.
3
UNDERSTANDING DOCTOR DECISION MAKING: THE CASE OF DEPRESSION TREATMENT.理解医生的决策过程:以抑郁症治疗为例。
Econometrica. 2020 May;88(3):847-878. doi: 10.3982/ecta16591.
4
Behavioral Heuristics in Coronary-Artery Bypass Graft Surgery.冠状动脉搭桥手术中的行为启发式方法
N Engl J Med. 2020 Feb 20;382(8):778-779. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc1911289.
5
The Determinants of Productivity in Medical Testing: Intensity and Allocation of Care.医疗检测生产力的决定因素:护理的强度和分配。
Am Econ Rev. 2016 Dec;106(12):3730-64.
6
Health Care Spending in the United States and Other High-Income Countries.美国和其他高收入国家的医疗保健支出。
JAMA. 2018 Mar 13;319(10):1024-1039. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.1150.
7
Overtesting and undertesting in primary care: a systematic review and meta-analysis.基层医疗中的过度检测与检测不足:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
BMJ Open. 2018 Feb 11;8(2):e018557. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-018557.
8
Cognitive biases associated with medical decisions: a systematic review.与医疗决策相关的认知偏差:一项系统综述。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2016 Nov 3;16(1):138. doi: 10.1186/s12911-016-0377-1.
9
When diagnostic testing leads to harm: a new outcomes-based approach for laboratory medicine.当诊断检测造成伤害时:实验室医学基于新结果的方法。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2013 Oct;22 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):ii6-ii10. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2012-001621. Epub 2013 Aug 16.
10
Working conditions in primary care: physician reactions and care quality.基层医疗的工作条件:医生的反应与医疗质量。
Ann Intern Med. 2009 Jul 7;151(1):28-36, W6-9. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-151-1-200907070-00006.