Yale University, New Haven, CT.
Department of Economics, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH.
Am Econ Rev. 2016 Dec;106(12):3730-64.
A large body of research has investigated whether physicians overuse care. There is less evidence on whether, for a fixed level of spending, doctors allocate resources to patients with the highest expected returns. We assess both sources of inefficiency, exploiting variation in rates of negative imaging tests for pulmonary embolism. We document enormous across-doctor heterogeneity in testing conditional on patient population, which explains the negative relationship between physicians' testing rates and test yields. Furthermore, doctors do not target testing to the highest risk patients, reducing test yields by one-third. Our calibration suggests misallocation is more costly than overuse.
大量研究调查了医生是否过度治疗。对于固定的支出水平,医生是否将资源分配给预期回报最高的患者,这方面的证据则较少。我们评估了这两种效率低下的来源,利用了肺栓塞阴性影像检查率的变化。我们记录了医生在给定患者群体条件下的检测存在巨大的异质性,这解释了医生的检测率和检测效果之间的负相关关系。此外,医生没有将检测针对风险最高的患者,这使得检测效果降低了三分之一。我们的校准结果表明,资源错配比过度使用的成本更高。