Conditioned pain modulation is not associated with thermal pain illusion.

OBJECTIVES

Paradoxical sensations, known as thermal pain illusions, can be evoked by painful cold-heat pulse stimulation. They may provide diagnostic value; however, the possible interaction between conditioned pain modulation and thermal pain illusions has not been explored. The present study examined: (1) whether conditioned pain modulation could be induced by alternating tonic painful cold-heat pulse stimulation; and (2) whether the presence of thermal pain illusions during the conditioning stimulus influences the degree of conditioned pain modulation.

METHODS

This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Meikai University (A1507). Conditioned pain modulation was provoked using alternating painful cold-heat pulses delivered at 20-s intervals applied to the forearm. Thermal pain illusions were qualitatively evaluated, and conditioned pain modulation was assessed quantitatively using the pressure pain threshold as a test stimulus. Differences in the conditioned pain modulation effect between the participants who experienced thermal pain illusions and those who did not were analysed using Student's -test.

RESULTS

A significant positive conditioned pain modulation effect (51.0 ± 4.7%, overall effect) was detected. There was no significant difference in conditioned pain modulation between the participants who experienced thermal pain illusions and those who did not (44.3 ± 6.0% and 55.5 ± 6.8%, respectively; p = 0.255).

CONCLUSIONS

Conditioned pain modulation induced by alternating painful conditioning cold-heat pulse stimulation was identical during the conditioning stimulation in volunteers with and without thermal pain illusions. Conditioning cold-heat pulse stimulation is useful to evaluate conditioned pain modulation. Moreover, conditioned pain modulation is not influenced by the presence of thermal pain illusions, indicating partially different underlying supraspinal, neuronal networks.