• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

“他们不想让他们有能力”:英格兰多机构实施 2005 年《精神能力法案》以照顾自我忽视的成年人。

'They don't want them to have capacity': Multi-agency operationalisation of the Mental Capacity Act 2005 in England with adults who self-neglect.

机构信息

Faculty of Health, School of Nursing and Allied Health, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool, UK.

出版信息

Health Soc Care Community. 2022 Nov;30(6):e4395-e4404. doi: 10.1111/hsc.13839. Epub 2022 May 23.

DOI:10.1111/hsc.13839
PMID:35607758
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10083994/
Abstract

The number of adults who self-neglect and thus fall under the aegis of local authority adult safeguarding procedures in England has increased substantially since the introduction of the Care Act 2014. The requirement for collaborative working between agencies dealing with these adults in a safeguarding context is explicit in government policy and legislation. Decisions made by the multiplicity of agencies that may work with people who self-neglect are largely guided by the Mental Capacity Act 2005 (MCA). The overall objective of this research was to develop a clearer understanding of how the range of agencies that might typically be involved in the life of a self-neglecting person work together. This article examines how agencies put the MCA into practice in their work with people who self-neglect, and how they understand their own and others' roles and responsibilities in so doing. This qualitative study took place in two local authorities in England from 2016 to 2017 and informed a wider action research study which was completed in 2019. Non-probability purposive sampling was used to recruit participants from the professional groups who might typically be involved with self-neglect cases. À total of 245 participants from across 17 different professional groups took part in semi-structured interviews, in a group, paired or individual format, decided by their customary working configuration. Data from the interview transcripts was analysed using thematic analysis. Three key themes in relation to how participants understood the MCA and multi-agency working emerged from the analysis of this data set. These were; a lack of understanding of the MCA by participants and other agencies; a reluctance to engage with MCA assessments; and a perception of manipulation of the MCA by other professionals. This study underlines the importance of the informed application of the MCA in working with people who self-neglect, and an urgent need to consider how this could be enhanced if the service user is not to experience intrusive interventions resulting from professional misinterpretation.

摘要

自 2014 年《护理法案》(Care Act)颁布以来,在英国,自我忽视的成年人数量大幅增加,因此需要地方当局成人保护程序的保护。政府政策和法规明确要求在保护背景下处理这些成年人的机构之间进行协作。在自我忽视的情况下与这些成年人合作的多个机构做出的决策主要受到 2005 年《精神能力法案》(MCA)的指导。这项研究的总体目标是更清楚地了解可能参与自我忽视者生活的各种机构如何共同协作。本文探讨了各机构如何在与自我忽视者的工作中实施 MCA,以及他们如何理解自己和他人在这方面的角色和责任。这项定性研究于 2016 年至 2017 年在英格兰的两个地方当局进行,并为 2019 年完成的更广泛的行动研究提供了信息。非概率目的性抽样用于从可能通常涉及自我忽视案件的专业群体中招募参与者。共有来自 17 个不同专业群体的 245 名参与者参加了半结构化访谈,访谈形式为小组、配对或个人,由他们的惯用工作配置决定。访谈记录中的数据使用主题分析进行分析。从对这组数据的分析中得出了与参与者对 MCA 和多机构工作的理解有关的三个关键主题。这些主题是:参与者和其他机构对 MCA 的理解不足;不愿进行 MCA 评估;以及其他专业人员对 MCA 的操纵的看法。这项研究强调了在与自我忽视者合作时,MCA 的知情应用的重要性,并且迫切需要考虑如果服务使用者没有因专业人员的错误解释而经历侵入性干预,如何增强这一点。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c97c/10083994/b397969f2661/HSC-30-e4395-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c97c/10083994/b397969f2661/HSC-30-e4395-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c97c/10083994/b397969f2661/HSC-30-e4395-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
'They don't want them to have capacity': Multi-agency operationalisation of the Mental Capacity Act 2005 in England with adults who self-neglect.“他们不想让他们有能力”:英格兰多机构实施 2005 年《精神能力法案》以照顾自我忽视的成年人。
Health Soc Care Community. 2022 Nov;30(6):e4395-e4404. doi: 10.1111/hsc.13839. Epub 2022 May 23.
2
Adult safeguarding managers' understandings of self-neglect and hoarding.成人保护管理人员对自我忽视和囤积的理解。
Health Soc Care Community. 2022 Nov;30(6):e4405-e4415. doi: 10.1111/hsc.13841. Epub 2022 May 17.
3
"Keeping Control": A user-led exploratory study of mental health service user experiences of targeted violence and abuse in the context of adult safeguarding in England.《保持控制》:一项由用户主导的探索性研究,探讨了英格兰成人保护背景下心理健康服务使用者遭受针对性暴力和虐待的经历。
Health Soc Care Community. 2019 Sep;27(5):e781-e792. doi: 10.1111/hsc.12806. Epub 2019 Jun 30.
4
Mental capacity assessment in the multi-professional real world: a qualitative study of six areas of uncertainty.多专业现实世界中的心理能力评估:对六个不确定领域的定性研究
Wellcome Open Res. 2024 Apr 24;9:221. doi: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.20952.1. eCollection 2024.
5
Clinical implications of self-neglect among patients in community settings.社区环境中患者自我忽视的临床意义。
Br J Community Nurs. 2019 Nov 2;24(11):524-526. doi: 10.12968/bjcn.2019.24.11.524.
6
The Effectiveness of Integrated Care Pathways for Adults and Children in Health Care Settings: A Systematic Review.综合护理路径在医疗环境中对成人和儿童的有效性:一项系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2009;7(3):80-129. doi: 10.11124/01938924-200907030-00001.
7
8
Nurses' Perceptions of Factors Influencing Elder Self-neglect: A Qualitative Study.护士对影响老年人自我忽视因素的看法:一项定性研究。
Asian Nurs Res (Korean Soc Nurs Sci). 2020 Aug;14(3):137-143. doi: 10.1016/j.anr.2020.05.001. Epub 2020 Jun 27.
9
A qualitative case study in the social capital of co-professional collaborative co-practice for children with speech, language and communication needs.一项关于有言语、语言和沟通需求儿童的跨专业协作共同实践社会资本的定性案例研究。
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2017 Jul;52(4):514-527. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.12296. Epub 2016 Nov 4.
10
Best interests decisions: professional practices in health and social care.符合患者最佳利益的决策:健康与社会照护中的专业实践
Health Soc Care Community. 2014 Jan;22(1):78-86. doi: 10.1111/hsc.12066. Epub 2013 Aug 24.

引用本文的文献

1
"Falling between the cracks": Investigating the competing challenges experienced by professionals working with people who hoard.“陷入缝隙之中”:探究与囤积者打交道的专业人员所面临的相互竞争的挑战
PLoS One. 2025 May 9;20(5):e0323389. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0323389. eCollection 2025.

本文引用的文献

1
Supported decision-making and mental capacity assessment in care homes: A qualitative study.支持决策和养老院的心理能力评估:一项定性研究。
Health Soc Care Community. 2022 Jul;30(4):e1061-e1069. doi: 10.1111/hsc.13512. Epub 2021 Jul 12.
2
Applying decision-making capacity criteria in practice: A content analysis of court judgments.在实践中应用决策能力标准:对法院判决的内容分析。
PLoS One. 2021 Feb 5;16(2):e0246521. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0246521. eCollection 2021.
3
What is the nature of Mental Capacity Act training and how do health and social care practitioners change their practice post-training? A narrative review.
《精神能力法案》培训的性质是什么,以及卫生和社会保健从业者在培训后如何改变他们的实践?叙述性综述。
J Clin Nurs. 2020 Jul;29(13-14):2093-2106. doi: 10.1111/jocn.15256. Epub 2020 Apr 16.
4
How do health and social care professionals in England and Wales assess mental capacity? A literature review.英格兰和威尔士的健康和社会保健专业人员如何评估心理能力?文献综述。
Disabil Rehabil. 2020 Sep;42(19):2797-2808. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2019.1572793. Epub 2019 Feb 10.
5
Taking capacity seriously? Ten years of mental capacity disputes before England's Court of Protection.认真对待能力问题?英格兰保护法院十年精神能力纠纷
Int J Law Psychiatry. 2019 Jan-Feb;62:56-76. doi: 10.1016/j.ijlp.2018.11.005. Epub 2018 Dec 2.
6
Healthcare professionals' understanding of the legislation governing research involving adults lacking mental capacity in England and Wales: a national survey.英格兰和威尔士的医疗保健专业人员对涉及无行为能力成年人的研究的立法的理解:一项全国性调查。
J Med Ethics. 2018 Sep;44(9):632-637. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2017-104722. Epub 2018 Apr 25.
7
Community nurse's knowledge, confidence and experience of the Mental Capacity Act in practice.社区护士在实践中对《精神能力法案》的知识、信心和经验。
Br J Community Nurs. 2016 Dec 2;21(12):615-622. doi: 10.12968/bjcn.2016.21.12.615.
8
What do we know about the application of the Mental Capacity Act (2005) in healthcare practice regarding decision-making for frail and older people? A systematic literature review.关于《精神能力法案》(2005年)在医疗保健实践中针对体弱老年人决策制定方面的应用,我们了解多少?一项系统的文献综述。
Health Soc Care Community. 2017 Mar;25(2):295-308. doi: 10.1111/hsc.12310. Epub 2015 Nov 26.
9
Factors that promote and hinder joint and integrated working between health and social care services: a review of research literature.促进和阻碍卫生与社会护理服务之间联合与整合工作的因素:研究文献综述
Health Soc Care Community. 2014 May;22(3):225-33. doi: 10.1111/hsc.12057. Epub 2013 Jun 11.
10
Focus group interviews in nursing research: part 1.护理研究中的焦点小组访谈:第1部分。
Br J Nurs. 2013;22(1):16-9. doi: 10.12968/bjon.2013.22.1.16.