• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

护理研究中的焦点小组访谈:第1部分。

Focus group interviews in nursing research: part 1.

作者信息

Doody Owen, Slevin Eamonn, Taggart Laurence

机构信息

Department of Nursing and Midwifery, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland.

出版信息

Br J Nurs. 2013;22(1):16-9. doi: 10.12968/bjon.2013.22.1.16.

DOI:10.12968/bjon.2013.22.1.16
PMID:23299206
Abstract

Focus groups are used by researchers in the social and behavioural sciences to explore phenomena and are accepted as a legitimate qualitative methodology. The primary goal of focus groups is to use interaction data resulting from discussion among participants to increase the depth of the enquiry and reveal aspects of the phenomenon assumed to be otherwise less accessible. This article, the first of three articles on focus groups, examines the nature of focus groups, issues regarding planning focus groups, selecting participants and the size of the groups. This article is aimed at students who are undertaking research modules as part of their academic studies or writing a research proposal as well as at novice researchers who intend to use focus groups as a means of data collection.

摘要

焦点小组被社会和行为科学领域的研究人员用于探索各种现象,并被视为一种合理的定性研究方法。焦点小组的主要目标是利用参与者之间讨论产生的互动数据,以加深调查的深度,并揭示那些被认为难以通过其他方式获取的现象的各个方面。本文是关于焦点小组的三篇文章中的第一篇,探讨了焦点小组的性质、焦点小组规划、参与者选择和小组规模等问题。本文的目标读者是正在进行学术研究模块学习或撰写研究提案的学生,以及打算将焦点小组作为数据收集手段的新手研究人员。

相似文献

1
Focus group interviews in nursing research: part 1.护理研究中的焦点小组访谈:第1部分。
Br J Nurs. 2013;22(1):16-9. doi: 10.12968/bjon.2013.22.1.16.
2
Preparing for and conducting focus groups in nursing research: part 2.护理研究中焦点小组的准备与实施:第2部分。
Br J Nurs. 2013;22(3):170-3. doi: 10.12968/bjon.2013.22.3.170.
3
Focus group research.焦点小组研究。
Nurs Stand. 2015 May 13;29(37):44-8. doi: 10.7748/ns.29.37.44.e8822.
4
Focus groups: principles and process.焦点小组:原则与流程
Nurse Res. 2009;16(3):57-69. doi: 10.7748/nr2009.04.16.3.57.c6946.
5
Focus group interviews part 3: analysis.焦点小组访谈 第3部分:分析
Br J Nurs. 2013;22(5):266-9. doi: 10.12968/bjon.2013.22.5.266.
6
Literature review: considerations in undertaking focus group research with culturally and linguistically diverse groups.文献综述:针对文化和语言背景各异群体开展焦点小组研究的注意事项
J Clin Nurs. 2007 Jun;16(6):1000-11. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2006.01760.x.
7
An investigation into adult nursing students' experience of the relevance and application of behavioural sciences (biology, psychology and sociology) across two different curricula.一项针对成年护理专业学生在两种不同课程体系中对行为科学(生物学、心理学和社会学)相关性及应用体验的调查。
Nurse Educ Today. 2005 Jan;25(1):41-8. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2004.09.009.
8
Focus groups in nursing research: methodological perspectives.护理研究中的焦点小组:方法学视角。
Nurs Outlook. 2012 Nov-Dec;60(6):411-6. doi: 10.1016/j.outlook.2012.02.001. Epub 2012 Mar 29.
9
Perils and pitfalls for clinicians embarking on qualitative research in physiotherapy.物理治疗领域中开展定性研究的临床医生面临的风险与陷阱。
Nurse Res. 2015 May;22(5):30-4. doi: 10.7748/nr.22.5.30.e1330.
10
Focus group methodology: explanatory notes for the novice nurse researcher.焦点小组方法:给新手护士研究者的解释性说明
Contemp Nurse. 2003 Jun;14(3):271-80. doi: 10.5172/conu.14.3.271.

引用本文的文献

1
Option talk and risk communication with people with limited health literacy: A qualitative focus group study with key stakeholders.与健康素养有限的人群进行期权讨论和风险沟通:一项与关键利益相关者开展的定性焦点小组研究。
PLoS One. 2025 Aug 29;20(8):e0330191. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0330191. eCollection 2025.
2
Informal Palliative Care at Home: A Focus Group Study Among Professionals Working in Palliative Care in Portugal.居家非正式姑息治疗:葡萄牙姑息治疗专业人员的焦点小组研究
Healthcare (Basel). 2025 Apr 23;13(9):978. doi: 10.3390/healthcare13090978.
3
Clinical education: nursing students' experiences with multisource feedback using a digital assessment instrument in the emergency medical Service - a qualitative study.
临床教育:护理专业学生在紧急医疗服务中使用数字评估工具进行多源反馈的体验——一项定性研究
BMC Med Educ. 2025 Mar 18;25(1):391. doi: 10.1186/s12909-025-06950-0.
4
Teaching in the Digital Age-Developing a Support Program for Nursing Education Providers: Design-Based Research.数字时代的教学——为护理教育提供者开发支持项目:基于设计的研究
JMIR Form Res. 2025 Jan 15;9:e66109. doi: 10.2196/66109.
5
Nursing staff adherence to guidelines on nutritional management for critically ill patients with cancer: A service evaluation.护理人员对癌症重症患者营养管理指南的依从性:一项服务评估。
Nurs Crit Care. 2025 Mar;30(2):e13062. doi: 10.1111/nicc.13062. Epub 2024 Mar 20.
6
Fertility tracking tool for visually impaired and non-visually impaired women: A qualitative study.针对视障和非视障女性的生育追踪工具:一项定性研究。
Belitung Nurs J. 2022 Jun 28;8(3):266-274. doi: 10.33546/bnj.1949. eCollection 2022.
7
Exploring Experiences of Workplace Violence and Attempts to Address Violence Among Mental Health Nurses in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.探索沙特阿拉伯王国精神科护士的工作场所暴力经历及应对暴力的尝试。
SAGE Open Nurs. 2022 Dec 13;8:23779608221142716. doi: 10.1177/23779608221142716. eCollection 2022 Jan-Dec.
8
A tool to evaluate physiotherapy clinical education in South Africa.一种评估南非物理治疗临床教育的工具。
S Afr J Physiother. 2022 Aug 31;78(1):1759. doi: 10.4102/sajp.v78i1.1759. eCollection 2022.
9
[Expectations of generation Y for digital health innovations].Y 世代对数字健康创新的期望
Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2022 Sep;65(9):881-890. doi: 10.1007/s00103-022-03567-2. Epub 2022 Jul 29.
10
'They don't want them to have capacity': Multi-agency operationalisation of the Mental Capacity Act 2005 in England with adults who self-neglect.“他们不想让他们有能力”:英格兰多机构实施 2005 年《精神能力法案》以照顾自我忽视的成年人。
Health Soc Care Community. 2022 Nov;30(6):e4395-e4404. doi: 10.1111/hsc.13839. Epub 2022 May 23.