• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用羟基磷灰石或丙烯酸进行颅骨修复术与降低全因和感染相关的假体取出风险相关。

Cranioplasty with hydroxyapatite or acrylic is associated with a reduced risk of all-cause and infection-associated explantation.

机构信息

Department of Neurosurgery, The Walton Centre NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, United Kingdom.

Institute of Systems, Molecular, and Integrative Biology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Br J Neurosurg. 2022 Jun;36(3):385-393. doi: 10.1080/02688697.2022.2077311. Epub 2022 May 24.

DOI:10.1080/02688697.2022.2077311
PMID:35608052
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Cranioplasty remains an essential procedure following craniectomy but is associated with high morbidity. We investigated factors associated with outcomes following first alloplastic cranioplasty.

METHODS

A single-centre, retrospective cohort study of patients undergoing first alloplastic cranioplasty at a tertiary neuroscience centre (01 March 2010-01 September 2021). Patient demographics and craniectomy/cranioplasty details were extracted. Primary outcome was all-cause explantation. Secondary outcomes were explantation secondary to infection, surgical morbidity and mortality. Multivariable analysis was performed using Cox proportional hazards regression or binary logistic regression.

RESULTS

Included were 287 patients with a mean age of 42.9 years [SD = 15.4] at time of cranioplasty. The most common indication for craniectomy was traumatic brain injury (32.1%, n = 92). Cranioplasty materials included titanium plate (23.3%, n = 67), hydroxyapatite (22.3%, n = 64), acrylic (20.6%, n = 59), titanium mesh (19.2%, n = 55), hand-moulded PMMA cement (9.1%, n = 26) and PEEK (5.6%, n = 16). Median follow-up time after cranioplasty was 86.5 months (IQR 44.6-111.3). All-cause explantation was 12.2% (n = 35). Eighty-three patients (28.9%) had surgical morbidity. In multivariable analysis, the risk of all-cause explantation and explantation due to infection was reduced with the use of both hydroxyapatite (HR 0.22 [95% CI 0.07-0.71],  = .011, HR 0.22 [95% CI 0.05-0.93],  = .040) and acrylic (HR 0.20 [95% CI 0.06-0.73],  = .015, HR 0.24 [95% CI 0.06-0.97],  = .045), respectively. In addition, risk of explantation due to infection was increased when time to cranioplasty was between three and six months (HR 6.38 [95% CI 1.35-30.19],  = .020). Mean age at cranioplasty (HR 1.47 [95% CI 1.03-2.11],  = .034), titanium mesh (HR 5.36 [95% CI 1.88-15.24],  = .002), and use of a drain (HR 3.37 [95% CI 1.51-7.51],  = .003) increased risk of mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

Morbidity is high following cranioplasty, with over a tenth requiring explantation. Hydroxyapatite and acrylic were associated with reduced risk of all-cause explantation and explantation due to infection. Cranioplasty insertion at three to six months was associated with increased risk of explantation due to infection.

摘要

目的

颅骨成形术仍是颅骨切除术的重要后续治疗手段,但与之相关的发病率较高。本研究旨在调查首例异体颅骨成形术后结局的相关影响因素。

方法

对在三级神经科学中心(2010 年 3 月 1 日至 2021 年 9 月 1 日)接受首例异体颅骨成形术的患者进行单中心回顾性队列研究。患者的人口统计学和颅骨切除术/颅骨成形术的详细信息被提取出来。主要结局是所有原因的假体取出。次要结局为感染、手术发病率和死亡率导致的假体取出。使用 Cox 比例风险回归或二项逻辑回归进行多变量分析。

结果

共纳入 287 例患者,颅骨成形术时的平均年龄为 42.9 岁[标准差(SD)=15.4]。颅骨切除术最常见的指征是创伤性脑损伤(32.1%,n=92)。颅骨成形术材料包括钛板(23.3%,n=67)、羟基磷灰石(22.3%,n=64)、丙烯酸(20.6%,n=59)、钛网(19.2%,n=55)、手工成型 PMMA 水泥(9.1%,n=26)和聚醚醚酮(5.6%,n=16)。颅骨成形术后的中位随访时间为 86.5 个月(IQR 44.6-111.3)。所有原因的假体取出率为 12.2%(n=35)。83 例患者(28.9%)发生手术并发症。多变量分析显示,使用羟基磷灰石(HR 0.22[95%CI 0.07-0.71],=0.011,HR 0.22[95%CI 0.05-0.93],=0.040)和丙烯酸(HR 0.20[95%CI 0.06-0.73],=0.015,HR 0.24[95%CI 0.06-0.97],=0.045)可降低所有原因假体取出和感染导致假体取出的风险。此外,颅骨成形术至感染的时间在 3 至 6 个月之间时,感染导致假体取出的风险增加(HR 6.38[95%CI 1.35-30.19],=0.020)。颅骨成形术时的平均年龄(HR 1.47[95%CI 1.03-2.11],=0.034)、钛网(HR 5.36[95%CI 1.88-15.24],=0.002)和引流管的使用(HR 3.37[95%CI 1.51-7.51],=0.003)增加了死亡率的风险。

结论

颅骨成形术后发病率较高,超过十分之一的患者需要取出假体。羟基磷灰石和丙烯酸与降低所有原因假体取出和感染导致假体取出的风险相关。颅骨成形术在 3 至 6 个月之间进行与感染导致假体取出的风险增加有关。

相似文献

1
Cranioplasty with hydroxyapatite or acrylic is associated with a reduced risk of all-cause and infection-associated explantation.使用羟基磷灰石或丙烯酸进行颅骨修复术与降低全因和感染相关的假体取出风险相关。
Br J Neurosurg. 2022 Jun;36(3):385-393. doi: 10.1080/02688697.2022.2077311. Epub 2022 May 24.
2
Long-Term Complications of Cranioplasty Using Stored Autologous Bone Graft, Three-Dimensional Polymethyl Methacrylate, or Titanium Mesh After Decompressive Craniectomy: A Single-Center Experience After 596 Procedures.去骨瓣减压术后应用自体骨移植物、三维聚甲基丙烯酸甲酯或钛网进行颅骨修补的长期并发症:596 例单中心经验
World Neurosurg. 2019 Aug;128:e841-e850. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2019.05.005. Epub 2019 May 10.
3
Timing of cranioplasty: a 10.75-year single-center analysis of 754 patients.颅骨修补术的时机:754 例患者 10.75 年单中心分析。
J Neurosurg. 2018 Jun;128(6):1648-1652. doi: 10.3171/2016.11.JNS161917. Epub 2017 Aug 11.
4
Cranioplasty outcomes and associated complications: A single-centre observational study.颅骨成形术的结果及相关并发症:一项单中心观察性研究。
Br J Neurosurg. 2016;30(1):122-7. doi: 10.3109/02688697.2015.1080216. Epub 2015 Aug 28.
5
Factors predicting complications following cranioplasty.颅骨修补术后并发症的预测因素。
J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2022 Feb;50(2):134-139. doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2021.08.001. Epub 2021 Aug 25.
6
Comparison between autologous bone grafts and acrylic (PMMA) implants - A retrospective analysis of 286 cranioplasty procedures.自体骨移植与丙烯酸(聚甲基丙烯酸甲酯)植入物的比较——对286例颅骨成形术的回顾性分析。
J Clin Neurosci. 2019 Mar;61:205-209. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2018.10.017. Epub 2018 Nov 3.
7
Independent Factors Affecting Postoperative Complication Rates After Custom-Made Porous Hydroxyapatite Cranioplasty: A Single-Center Review of 109 Cases.影响定制多孔羟基磷灰石颅骨成形术后并发症发生率的独立因素:109例单中心回顾性研究
World Neurosurg. 2018 Jun;114:e1232-e1244. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2018.03.181. Epub 2018 Apr 3.
8
Skull Reconstruction Using a Custom-Made, Three-Dimensional-Printed, Hydroxyapatite-Titanium Cranioplasty Implant: Largest Single-Center U.S. Experience.颅骨重建采用定制的、三维打印的、羟基磷灰石-钛颅骨修补植入物:最大的单一中心美国经验。
World Neurosurg. 2022 Nov;167:e1387-e1394. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2022.09.050. Epub 2022 Sep 14.
9
[The impact of early cranioplasty on cerebral blood flow and its correlation with neurological and cognitive outcome. Prospective multi-centre study on 24 patients].[早期颅骨修补术对脑血流的影响及其与神经和认知结果的相关性。对24例患者的前瞻性多中心研究]
Rev Neurol (Paris). 2013 Mar;169(3):240-8. doi: 10.1016/j.neurol.2012.06.016. Epub 2012 Oct 18.
10
Surgical preference regarding different materials for custom-made allograft cranioplasty in patients with calvarial defects: Results from an internal audit covering the last 20 years.针对颅骨缺损患者使用不同材料进行定制化同种异体移植物颅骨成形术的手术偏好:一项涵盖过去 20 年的内部审计结果。
J Clin Neurosci. 2020 Apr;74:98-103. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2020.01.087. Epub 2020 Feb 4.

引用本文的文献

1
Patient-specific titanium-reinforced calcium-phosphate (CaP: Ti) implants for revision cranioplasty.用于颅骨修补术翻修的定制钛增强磷酸钙(CaP:Ti)植入物。
Brain Spine. 2025 Feb 13;5:104213. doi: 10.1016/j.bas.2025.104213. eCollection 2025.
2
Health-related quality of life following cranioplasty: a cross-sectional cohort study - Cranio-PRO.颅骨修补术后的健康相关生活质量:一项横断面队列研究——Cranio-PRO。
Neurosurg Rev. 2025 Jan 14;48(1):45. doi: 10.1007/s10143-024-03158-6.
3
Long-Term Follow-Up of Custom-Made Porous Hydroxyapatite Cranioplasties: Analysis of Infections in Adult and Pediatric Patients.
定制多孔羟基磷灰石颅骨修补术的长期随访:成人和儿童患者感染情况分析
J Clin Med. 2024 Feb 17;13(4):1133. doi: 10.3390/jcm13041133.
4
Traumatic Fracture Treatment: Calcium Phosphate Bone Substitute Case-Control Study in Humerus, Radius, Tibia Fractures-Assessing Efficacy and Recovery Outcomes.创伤性骨折治疗:磷酸钙骨替代物在肱骨、桡骨、胫骨骨折中的病例对照研究——评估疗效和恢复结果
Biomedicines. 2023 Oct 22;11(10):2862. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines11102862.
5
Cranial meningioma with bone involvement: surgical strategies and clinical considerations.颅骨脑膜瘤伴骨侵犯:手术策略和临床考虑。
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2023 May;165(5):1355-1363. doi: 10.1007/s00701-023-05535-4. Epub 2023 Mar 6.
6
Paradigm Shift in Materials for Skull Reconstruction Facilitated by Science and Technological Integration.科技融合推动颅骨重建材料的范式转变
Cureus. 2022 Sep 3;14(9):e28731. doi: 10.7759/cureus.28731. eCollection 2022 Sep.